切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 305 -309. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2017.04.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效观察
王峰1,(), 龚旭晨1   
  1. 1. 830001 新疆乌鲁木齐自治区人民医院肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-07 出版日期:2017-08-25
  • 通信作者: 王峰

Clinical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries for low rectal cancer

Feng Wang1,(), Xuchen Gong1   

  1. 1. Anorectal Surgery, Autonomous Region People′s Hospital, Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2017-04-07 Published:2017-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Feng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Feng, Emai:
引用本文:

王峰, 龚旭晨. 手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 06(04): 305-309.

Feng Wang, Xuchen Gong. Clinical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries for low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(04): 305-309.

目的

探讨手助腹腔镜手术(HALS)治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效。

方法

收集新疆乌鲁木齐自治区人民医院肛肠外科2013年至2015年接受HALS的结直肠癌患者的完整临床资料,对HALS的成功率,长期疗效进行分析,研究该治疗方法的安全性与有效性。

结果

共计103例患者接受HALS术。患者平均年龄为(64±13.4)岁。男46例,女57例。体重指数(BMI)平均为(27.3±5.8)kg / m2。43例患者(41.8%)曾经进行过腹部手术。平均HALS时间为105 min(55~185 min)。中转开放率为2.7%(3/103)。胃肠功能恢复的平均时间为2.5天(2.2~4.5天)。住院时间平均为9天。术后并发症和死亡率分别为10.7%和0.97%,4例切口疝(3.9%),平均随访(7.0±3.4)个月。没有一名患者出现穿刺套部或手助装置处复发。

结论

HALS结直肠切除术是一种安全有效的技术,它提供了微创手术的所有好处。

Objective

To explore clinical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal cancer (HALS).

Methods

Collected the clinical data of patients with colorectal cancer who received HALS from 2013 to 2015 in Xinjiang Urumqi Autonomous Region People's Hospital, and analysed the success rate of the technique and the long-term curative effect, the safety and effectiveness of the treatment.

Results

One hundred and three patients were performed HALS colorectal resections. The patients′ mean age was (64±13.4) years. There were 46 male and 57 female patients. The body mass index was (27.3±5.8) kg/m2 . Forty-three patients (41.8%) had experienced prior abdominal surgerys. The mean HALS time was 105 minutes (range, 55~185 minutes). The conversion rate was 2.7% (3/103).The average recovery of gastrointestinal function was 2.5 days (range, 2.2~4.5 days). The median length of hospital stay was 9 days. The postoperative complication and mortality rates were 10.7% and 0.97%, respectively. And four incisions hernia (3.9%) were followed by an average follow-up of 7.0±3.4 months. None of the patients had a trocar or a hand-port site recurrence.

Conclusion

A HALS colorectal resection is a safe and effective technique, and it provides all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

表1 患者进行HALS手术类型
表2 HALS术中结果
表3 HALS主要术式和术后并发症
图1 手助腹腔镜左侧结肠和直肠癌术式手术时间趋势
[1]
Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy)[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(3):144-150.
[2]
Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al.Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 204(2):291-307.
[3]
Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2004, 91(4):409-417.
[4]
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(20):2050-2059.
[5]
Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008, 12(3):583-951.
[6]
Schirmer BD. Laparoscopic colon resection[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1996, 76:571-83.
[7]
Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 242(1):83-91.
[8]
Ou H. Laparoscopic-assisted mini laparatomy with colectomy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1995, 38(3):324-326.
[9]
Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy:evolution to a clinically useful technique[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47(5):753-765.
[10]
Cima RR, Pattana-arun J, Larson DW, et al. Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2008, 206(5):946-950.
[11]
Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, et al. Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery[J]. Arch Surg, 2012, 147(4):317-322.
[12]
Ozturk E, da Luz Moreira A, Vogel JD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: the learning curve is for operative speed, not for quality[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2010, 12(10 Online):e304-930.
[13]
Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost[J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(2):234-239.
[14]
HALS Study Group.Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2000, 14(10):896-901.
[15]
Maartense S, Bemelman WA, Gerritsen van der Hoop A, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(3):397-401.
[16]
Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(8):1769-1780.
[17]
Iqbal M, Bhalerao S. Current status of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2007, 17:172-179.
[18]
Schadde E, Smith D, Alkoraishi AS, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital:a prospective analysis of 104 consecutive cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(7):1077-1082.
[19]
Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(6):818-826.
[20]
Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, et al.Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50(6):908-919.
[21]
Ozturk E, Kiran RP, Geisler DP, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: benefits of laparoscopic colectomy at no extra cost[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009, 209(2):242-247.
[22]
Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy[J]. Br J Surg, 1995, 82:295-298.
[23]
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2004, 363(9416):1187-1192.
[24]
Sonoda T, Pandey S, Trencheva K, et al. Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009, 208(1):62-66.
[1] 罗青杉, 梅海涛, 郝家领, 蔡锦锋, 周润楷, 温玉刚. 连接蛋白43通过调控细胞周期抑制结直肠癌的增殖机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 344-349.
[2] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[3] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[4] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[5] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[6] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[7] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[8] 任佳琪, 刁德昌, 何自衍, 张雪阳, 唐新, 李文娟, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江. 网膜融合线导向的脾曲游离技术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 362-367.
[9] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[10] 张蔚林, 王哲学, 白峻阁, 黄忠诚, 肖志刚. 利用TCGA数据库构建基于miRNA的结直肠癌列线图预后模型[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 381-388.
[11] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[12] 季鹏程, 鄂一民, 陆晨, 喻春钊. 循环外泌体相关生物标志物在结直肠癌诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 265-273.
[13] 李佳莹, 王旭丹, 梁雪, 张雷, 李佳英. 1990~2021年中国结直肠癌死亡趋势分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 274-279.
[14] 戈伟, 陈刚. 纳米炭导航行淋巴示踪在结直肠癌TNM分期中淋巴分期价值的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 288-293.
[15] 崔精, 鲍一帆, 沈晓明, 杨增辉, 高森, 鲍传庆. 结直肠癌中circMFSD12对肿瘤细胞功能及5-FU敏感性的调控[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 294-302.
阅读次数
全文


摘要