切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (06) : 304 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2013.06.06

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

应用MNA-SF和NRS2002评价老年结直肠癌患者营养状况
王海宽1, 周军德1, 迟强1,()   
  1. 1. 150086 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院普外三科
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-29 出版日期:2013-12-25
  • 通信作者: 迟强

Assessment of the nutritional status of elderly patients with colorectal cancer by MNA-SF and NRS2002

Hai-kuan WANG1, Jun-de ZHOU1, Qiang CHI1()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
  • Received:2013-10-29 Published:2013-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Qiang CHI
引用本文:

王海宽, 周军德, 迟强. 应用MNA-SF和NRS2002评价老年结直肠癌患者营养状况[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2013, 02(06): 304-307.

Hai-kuan WANG, Jun-de ZHOU, Qiang CHI. Assessment of the nutritional status of elderly patients with colorectal cancer by MNA-SF and NRS2002[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(06): 304-307.

目的

旨在通过运用营养风险筛查2002(NRS-2002)及微型营养评估精法(short-form mini-nutritional assessment,MNA-SF)工具对125例老年结直肠癌患者进行营养评估,并探讨NRS2002和MNA-SF与传统营养评价方法的相关性。

方法

选定2012年3月至2013年9月哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院普外科新入院结直肠癌患者125例作为研究对象。患者入院后48小时内采集营养相关指标,并应用NRS-2002和MNA-SF对患者进行营养评估,分析研究对象营养风险的总体情况,计算两种方法与传统指标的相关性。

结果

125例结直肠癌患者应答率100%,无额外费用。用BMI中国标准判定营养不足发生率为30.0%,NRS2002营养风险率为32.8%,MNA-SF营养风险率为59.2%,NRS2002与BMI、Alb、Hb呈显著负相关系(P<0.05),MNA-SF与BMI、Alb、Hb呈显著正相关系(P<0.05)。

结论

本组老年结直肠癌患者营养不良发生率较高,NRS2002和MNA-SF均适用于老年结直肠癌患者的营养评估,但尚未发现联合应用的额外获益。

Objective

To assess the nutritional status in elderly patients with colorectal cancer and to analyze the correlation between different tools, and to confirm the correlation of short-form mini nutritional assessment(MNA-SF)along with NRS-2002 with classical nutritional markers.

Methods

Nutritional status of 125 hospitalized aged patients with colorectal cancer were evaluated by MNA-SF and NRS2002, and at the same time measured their classical nutritional markers.Then the relevance between them was analyzed.

Results

The prevalence of malnutrition in 125 patients by BMI, MNA-SF and NRS2002 was 30.0%, 59.2% and 59.2% respectively.MNA-SF and NRS2002 had the unanimous correlation with classical nutritional markers.

Conclusion

There is a high prevalence of malnutrition in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.MNA-SF and NRS2002 are suitable tools to evaluate the nutritional status of the hospitalized aged patients with colorectal cancer, though the reliability is to be further confirmed in our country.

表1 NRS2002及MNA-SF与传统营养指标的相关性(n=125)
表2 不同NRS2002及MNA-SF分值时传统营养指标变化(±s)
[1]
Gioulbasanis I,Georgoulias P,Vlachostergios PJ,et al.Mini Nutritional Assessment(MNA)and biochemical markers of cachexiain metastatic lung cancer patients:interrelations and associations with prognosis.Lung Cancer,2011,74(3):516-520.
[2]
Kwang AY,KandiahM.Objective and subjective nutritional assessment of patients with cancer in palliative care.AmJ HospP alliatCare,2010,27(2):117-126.
[3]
陈琼,刘志才,程兰平,等.2003~2007年中国结直肠癌发病与死亡分析.中国肿瘤,,2012,21(3):179-182.
[4]
Rubenstein LZ,Harker JO,Salva A,et al.Screening for under-nutritionin geriatric practice:developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment(MNA-SF).Jgerontol Abiol Sci,,2001,56:366-372.
[5]
陈春明.中国成人体重指数分类的推荐意见简介.中华预防医学杂志,2001,35(5):349-350.
[6]
Remy Meier,陈凌.ESPEN营养风险筛选(NRS2002)循证的方法及在欧洲的应用.中国临床营养杂志,2007,(1):4.
[7]
Karin Barendregt,Peter B,Simon P,et al.Basic concepts in nutrition:Diagnosis of malnutrition screening and assessment.the European e-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism,2008,3:121-125.
[8]
Woo J.Nutritional strategies for successful aging.Med Clin North Am,2011,95(3):477-93.
[9]
Adrienne M,Young B,Sarah Kidston B,et al.Malnutrition screening tools:comparison against two validated nutrition assessment methods in older medical inpatients.Nutrition,2013,29:101–106.
[10]
Kondrup J,Rasmussen HH,Ham berg,et al.Nutritional risk screening(NRS2002):a mew method based an analysis of controlled clinical trails[J].Cline Nutria,2006,22(3):321-336.
[11]
Rasm ussen HH,Kondrup J,Staun M,et al.Prevalence of patients at nutritional risk in Danish hospitals.Clin Nutr,2004,23(5):1009-1015.
[12]
Kuzuya M,Kanda S,Koike T,et al.Evaluation of mini-nutritional assessmentfor Japanese fraile lderly.Nutrition,2005,21(4):498-503.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[7] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[8] 王晓燕, 肖佑, 肖戈, 王真权. 老年结直肠癌肺转移CT特征及高危因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-509.
[9] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[12] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[13] 黄怡诚, 陆晨, 孙司正, 喻春钊. 肝特异性转录因子FOXA2在人结直肠癌肝转移阶梯模型中的表达变化及其意义[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 396-403.
[14] 刘祺, 张凯, 李建男, 刘铜军. 结直肠癌肝转移生物治疗的现状及进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 415-419.
[15] 孙昕, 程海波, 沈卫星. 基于全转录组学探讨仙连解毒方治疗Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的疗效机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要