切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 34 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2023.01.005

论著

年龄对转移性结直肠癌不同治疗方法的影响及预后研究
张学东1, 白峻阁2,(), 刘正2, 吴殿文1,()   
  1. 1. 102100 北京市延庆区医院(北京大学第三医院延庆医院)普外科
    2. 100021 国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-08 出版日期:2023-02-25
  • 通信作者: 白峻阁, 吴殿文

Study on the correlation between age and metastatic colorectal cancer treatment strategies and prognosis

Xuedong Zhang1, Junge Bai2,(), Zheng Liu2, Dianwen Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Yanqing District Hospital (Peking University Third Hospital Yanqing Hospital), Beijing 102100, China
    2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2022-11-08 Published:2023-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Junge Bai, Dianwen Wu
引用本文:

张学东, 白峻阁, 刘正, 吴殿文. 年龄对转移性结直肠癌不同治疗方法的影响及预后研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 34-41.

Xuedong Zhang, Junge Bai, Zheng Liu, Dianwen Wu. Study on the correlation between age and metastatic colorectal cancer treatment strategies and prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(01): 34-41.

目的

探讨年龄与转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的治疗方式选择和预后的相关性。

方法

我们从美国国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中选择了2004~2014年mCRC的患者,总数为43 977人,将患者分为三个年龄组:18~49岁、50~75岁和>75岁。分别描述了每个治疗类别的患者百分比,包括仅原发性肿瘤切除术(PTR)、仅化疗和PTR加化疗。在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,计算并比较不同年龄组和治疗组的限制平均生存时间(RMST)。

结果

18~49岁年龄组的大多数患者(61.8%)接受PTR联合化疗,50~75岁年龄组约有53.3%的患者接受PTR联合化疗,>75岁年龄组大约有34.7%接受PTR联合化疗。在研究期间,所有年龄组的mCRC患者,PTR加化疗组呈下降趋势,而仅化疗组呈上升趋势。与其他治疗方法相比,PTR加化疗在所有年龄组中的生存率最高。除了18~49岁组的患者外,化疗与仅PTR相比具有更高的生存时间。在接受PTR加化疗治疗的患者中,与其他治疗相比,18~49和50~75岁组的围手术期化疗的患者可以获得更长的生存期,但>75岁组的化疗与否和生存期无关。

结论

尽管mCRC患者PTR加化疗呈下降趋势,但是其在所有年龄组中显示出最大的生存获益。不同的年龄组在接受特定的MDT治疗后的获益存在差异。

Objective

To explore the correlation between age and treatment strategies and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 43 977 patients with mCRC were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) spanning ten years (2004~2014). Patients were classified into three age groups: 18~49, 50~75, and >75 years old. Percentages of patients within each treatment category were described, including primary tumor resection (PTR) only, chemotherapy only, and PTR plus chemotherapy. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, restricted mean survival time (RMST) was calculated and compared between different age and treatment groups.

Results

The majority (61.8%) of patients in the 18~49 age group received PTR plus chemotherapy; about half (53.3%) of the patients in the 50~75 age group and about one third (34.7%) in the >75 age group received PTR plus chemotherapy. There was a decreasing trend in the PTR plus chemotherapy group and an increasing trend in the chemotherapy only group for mCRC patients over the study time period in all age groups. PTR plus chemotherapy demonstrated the most favorable survival rate in all age groups compared to other treatments. Chemotherapy only was associated with significantly higher survival time compared to PTR, except for patients in the ages 18~49 group. Among patients who had PTR plus chemotherapy treatment, peri-operative chemotherapy was associated with the longest survival rate among patients in the ages 18~49 and 50~75 groups, but not in the >75 group, compared to other treatments.

Conclusion

A decreasing trend of PTR plus chemotherapy was observed among mCRC patients between 2004~2014, though it showed the most survival benefit in all age groups. The benefits of specific multimodality treatment vary by age group.

表1 患者在不同年龄分段中的特征
特征 年龄分组(例,%) 检验值 P
年轻组(n=7 936) 中年组(n=24 108) 老年组(n=5 079)
性别 1.861E2 <0.0001
4 252(53.6) 13 740(57.0) 2 372(46.7)
3 684(46.4) 10 368(43.0) 2 707(53.3)
种族 1.464E2 <0.0001
白人 6 239(78.6) 19 753(81.9) 4 405(86.7)
黑人 1 104(13.9) 2 954(12.3) 421(8.3)
其他 593(7.5) 1 401(5.8) 253(5.0)
医保状况 6.030 E3 <0.0001
个人 5 729(72.2) 11 461(47.5) 471(9.3)
政府 1 591(20.1) 10 960(45.5) 4 527(89.1)
没有医保 462(5.8) 1 280(5.3) 30(0.6)
未知 154(1.9) 407(1.7) 51(1.0)
人口分布 1.030 E2 <0.0001
大城市 6 234(78.6) 17 842(74.0) 3 744(73.7)
城市 1 225(15.4) 4 650(19.3) 1 004(19.8)
乡村 143(1.8) 709(2.9) 143(19.8)
未知 334(4.2) 907(3.8) 188(3.7)
距离(英里) 2.420 E2 <0.0001
≤12.5 2 943(37.1) 9 736(40.4) 2 528(49.8)
12.5~50 3 090(38.9) 9 169(38.0) 1 713(33.7)
>50 1 734(21.9) 4 727(19.6) 735(14.5)
未知 169(2.1) 476(2.0) 103(2.0)
诊断年份 50.501 <0.0001
2004~2005 1 111(14.0) 3 321(13.8) 785(15.4)
2006~2007 1 208(15.2) 3 782(15.7) 861(17.0)
2008~2009 1 428(18.0) 4 244(17.6) 990(19.5)
2010~2011 1 490(18.8) 4 583(19.0) 945(18.6)
2012~2013 1 756(22.1) 5 272(21.9) 986(19.4)
2014 943(11.9) 2 906(12.0) 512(10.0)
Charlson-Deyo共病指数 8.249E2 <0.0001
0 7 226(91.1) 19 183(79.6) 3 685(72.6)
1 584(7.4) 3 897(16.2) 1 044(20.5)
2 76(1.0) 700(2.9) 265(5.2)
3 50(0.6) 328(1.3) 85(1.7)
医院类别 3.190E3 <0.0001
社区医院 361(4.6) 1744(7.2) 435(8.6)
综合社区肿瘤医院 1 699(21.4) 8 659(35.9) 2 210(43.5)
学术或研究型 3 200(40.3) 11 370(47.2) 1 967(38.7)
其他 2 676(33.7) 2 335(9.7) 467(9.2)
肿瘤位置 7.311E2 <0.0001
近端结肠 1 812(24.4) 7 708(34.4) 2 253(48.2)
远端结肠 2 511(33.9) 6 398(28.5) 1 056(22.6)
直乙交界或直肠 3 095(41.7) 8 311(37.1) 1 369(29.3)
未知 518(6.5) 1 691(7.0) 401(7.9)
分化程度 41.136 <0.0001
高分化 310(3.9) 993(4.1) 218(4.3)
中分化 4 361(55.0) 13 004(53.9) 2 557(50.3)
低分化 1 633(20.6) 4 794(19.9) 1 047(20.6)
未分化 1 632(20.7) 5 317(22.1) 1 257(24.8)
淋巴管侵犯 62.813 <0.0001
977(12.3) 2 941(12.2) 497(9.8)
1 344(16.9) 3 641(15.1) 685(13.5)
未知 5 615(70.8) 17 526(72.7) 3 897(76.7)
神经侵犯 1.047E2 <0.0001
1 683(21.2) 5 012(20.8) 962(18.9)
863(10.9) 2 083(8.6) 320(6.3)
未知 5 390(67.9) 17 013(70.6) 3 797(74.8)
诊断距离治疗开始的时间(天) 4.720E2 <0.0001
≤30 5 505(69.37) 14 822(61.5) 2 783(54.8)
31~60 1 410(17.8) 5 227(21.7) 1 074(21.2)
>60 449(5.7) 1 865(7.7) 403(7.9)
未知 572(7.2) 2 194(9.1) 819(16.1)
原发灶切除 95.127 <0.0001
2 733(34.4) 9 255(38.4) 2 178(42.9)
5 203(65.6) 14 853(61.6) 2 901(57.1)
转移灶切除 3.529E2 <0.0001
5 240(66.0) 17 411(72.2) 4 122(81.2)
2 696(34.0) 6 697(27.8) 957(18.8)
单药化疗 4.244 E2 <0.0001
7 372(92.9) 21 924(90.9) 4 188(82.5)
564(7.1) 2 184(9.1) 891(17.5)
多药化疗 2.606 E3 <0.0001
1 456(18.4) 6 842(28.4) 3 017(59.4)
6 480(81.7) 17 266(71.6) 2 062(40.6)
治疗方法 2.513E3 <0.0001
手术联合化疗 4 907(61.8) 12 855(53.3) 1 761(34.7)
仅化疗 2 513(31.7) 7 841(32.5) 1 398(27.5)
仅原发灶切除 296(3.7) 1 998(8.3) 1 140(22.5)
220(2.8) 1 414(5.9) 780(15.3)
图1 不同年龄组治疗方式的变化趋势
图2 治疗方式和治疗顺序对不同年龄组生存的影响
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(1): 7-30.
[2]
Leung U, Gönen M, Allen PJ, et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastases and concurrent extrahepatic disease treated with resection[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(1): 158-165.
[3]
Riihimäki M, Hemminki A, Sundquist J, et al. Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6(15): 29765.
[4]
Siriwardena AK, Chan AKC, Ignatowicz AM, et al. Colorectal cancer with synchronous liver-limited metastases: the protocol of an inception cohort study (CoSMIC) [J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(6): e015018.
[5]
Rahbari NN, Carr PR, Jansen L, et al. Time of metastasis and outcome in colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(3): 494-502.
[6]
Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P. Do we make progress in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? [J]. Acta Oncol, 2018, 57(11): 1422-1426.
[7]
Kim CW, Baek JH, Choi GS, et al. The role of primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with asymptomatic, synchronous unresectable metastasis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2016, 17:34.
[8]
Pędziwiatr M, Mizera M, Witowski J, et al. Primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer: what has changed? [J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 34(12): 188.
[9]
Hess GP, Wang PF, Quach D, et al. Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: patterns of chemotherapy and biologic therapy use in US medical oncology practice[J]. J Oncol Pract, 2010, 6(6): 301-307.
[10]
Salvatore L, Aprile G, Arnoldi E, et al. Management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients: guidelines of the Italian Medical Oncology Association (AIOM) [J]. ESMO Open, 2017, 2 (1): e000147.
[11]
Garden OJ, Rees M, Poston GJ, et al. Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases[J]. Gut, 2006, 55 Suppl 3 (Suppl.3):iii1-8.
[12]
Kolarich A, George TJJr, Hughes SJ, et al. Rectal cancer patients younger than 50 years lack a survival benefit from NCCN guideline-directed treatment for stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ disease[J]. Cancer, 2018, 124(17): 3510-3519.
[13]
Kneuertz PJ, Chang GJ, Hu CY, et al. Overtreatment of young adults with colon cancer: more intense treatments with unmatched survival gains[J]. JAMA Surg, 2015, 150(5): 402-409.
[14]
Krell RW, Regenbogen SE, Wong SL. Variation in hospital treatment patterns for metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer, 2015, 121(11):1755-1761.
[15]
Hu CY, Bailey CE, You YN, et al. Time trend analysis of primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer: less surgery, improved survival[J]. JAMA Surg, 2015, 150(3): 245-251.
[16]
Royston P, Parmar MK. Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2013, 13: 152.
[17]
Zhu R, Liu F, Grisotti G, et al. Clinical impact of underutilization of adjuvant therapy in node positive gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2018, 9(3): 517-526.
[18]
Sanoff HK, Goldberg RM. How we treat metastatic colon cancer in older adults[J]. J Geriatr Oncol, 2013, 4(4): 295-301.
[19]
Grande R, Natoli C, Ciancola F, et al. Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients ≥75 years old in clinical practice: a multicenter analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(7): e0157751.
[20]
Vatandoust S, Price TJ, Ullah S, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer in young adults: a study from the south australian population-based registry[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2016, 15(1): 32-36.
[21]
Fakih MG. Metastatic colorectal cancer: current state and future directions[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(16): 1809-1824.
[22]
Gulack BC, Nussbaum DP, Keenan JE, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer without metastasectomy is associated with improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy/radiation therapy alone[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2016, 59(4): 299-305.
[23]
Alawadi Z, Phatak UR, Hu CY, et al. Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage Ⅳ colon cancer[J]. Cancer, 2017, 12(7): 1124-1133.
[24]
Feo L, Polcino M, Nash GM. Resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer: when is it necessary? [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 97(3): 657-669.
[25]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Rectal cancer (version3.2019)[EB/OL]. Accessed May 15, 2019.

URL    
[26]
Kim J, Hurria A. Determining chemotherapy tolerance in older patients with cancer[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2013, 11(12): 1494-1502.
[27]
Zhao H, Zhang N, Ho V, et al. Adherence to treatment guidelines and survival for older patients with stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ colon cancer in Texas from 2001 through 2011[J]. Cancer, 2018, 124(4): 679-687.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[7] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[8] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[9] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[10] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[11] 黄怡诚, 陆晨, 孙司正, 喻春钊. 肝特异性转录因子FOXA2在人结直肠癌肝转移阶梯模型中的表达变化及其意义[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 396-403.
[12] 刘祺, 张凯, 李建男, 刘铜军. 结直肠癌肝转移生物治疗的现状及进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 415-419.
[13] 吴寅, 陈智琴, 高勇, 权明. Her-2阳性结直肠癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 420-425.
[14] 范博洋, 王宁, 张骞, 王贵玉. 结直肠癌转移调控的环状RNA分子机制研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 426-430.
[15] 孙昕, 程海波, 沈卫星. 基于全转录组学探讨仙连解毒方治疗Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的疗效机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要