切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 370 -376. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2020.04.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

安置肠梗阻导管与支架治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的Meta分析
熊海波1, 侯能易2, 刘培曦3, 何雪铼2, 余松2, 胡雪梅2, 许杰2, 庞明辉4,()   
  1. 1. 646000 西南医科大学临床医学院
    2. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院胃肠外科
    3. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院消化内科
    4. 646000 西南医科大学临床医学院;610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-29 出版日期:2020-08-25
  • 通信作者: 庞明辉
  • 基金资助:
    四川省卫生厅基金(No.130163); 四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院临床研究与转化基金(No.2017LY05)

Meta-analysis of obstruction catheter and stent for colorectal cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction

Haibo Xiong1, Nengyi Hou2, Peixi Liu3, Xuelai He2, Song Yu2, Xuemei Hu2, Jie Xu2, Minghui Pang4,()   

  1. 1. Clinical Medicine College, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Province People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
    3. Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Province People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
    4. Clinical Medicine College, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Province People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2020-03-29 Published:2020-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Minghui Pang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pang Minghui, Email:
引用本文:

熊海波, 侯能易, 刘培曦, 何雪铼, 余松, 胡雪梅, 许杰, 庞明辉. 安置肠梗阻导管与支架治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的Meta分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 370-376.

Haibo Xiong, Nengyi Hou, Peixi Liu, Xuelai He, Song Yu, Xuemei Hu, Jie Xu, Minghui Pang. Meta-analysis of obstruction catheter and stent for colorectal cancer patients complicated with intestinal obstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(04): 370-376.

目的

通过Meta分析评价术前安置肠梗阻导管与支架治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的便捷性与有效性。

方法

利用PubMed、The Cochrane Library、FMRS、维普数据库、万方数据库和中国知网数据库,检索时间均为从数据库建库至2020年3月,利用RevMan5.3软件对两种治疗方法的便捷性和有效性指标进行Meta分析。

结果

最终纳入17篇随机对照研究文献,共1 136例患者。其中导管组566例,支架组570例。导管组安置时间、安置费用、安置成功率均优于支架组,差异有统计学意义(Z=28.70,4.66,3.22;P<0.05);支架组腹痛腹胀缓解时间、肠道准备时间、住院时间均优于导管组,差异有统计学意义(Z=4.15,2.31,2.92;P<0.05)。两组安置前后肠管内径减小差异、安置后手术并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹痛腹胀缓解时间的漏斗图提示无发表偏倚(P=0.075)。

结论

现有证据表明,安置肠梗阻导管较支架在梗阻性结直肠癌的治疗过程中,具有经济、快捷和高成功率优势,但缓解腹痛腹胀较慢、术前肠道准备时间和住院时间更久。

Objective

To evaluate the convenience and effectiveness of preoperative placement of obstruction catheter and stent in the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer through a meta-analysis.

Methods

A study search was undertaken in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, FMRS, VIP, Wanfang and CNKI database from the date of their establishment to March 2020. RevMan 5.3. software was used to analyze the convenience and effectiveness of the two methods.

Results

A total of 1 136 patients were included in 17 randomized controlled studies, including 566 patients in the catheter group and 570 patients in the stent group. Operation time, expenditure, rate of success in the catheter group were better than those in the stent group, with statistically significant differences (Z=28.70, 4.66, 3.22; P<0.05). Relief time of abdominal pain and distention, intestinal preparation time, hospitalization time in the the stent group were better than those in the catheter group, with statistically significant differences (Z=4.15, 2.31, 2.92; P<0.05). However, no differences were observed in the reduction of the bowel diameter and postoperative complications (P>0.05). There was no evidence of publication bias in studies used for relieving time of abdominal pain and distention (P=0.075).

Conclusions

Current evidence indicates that the obstruction catheter is more economical, faster and higher success rate, but it is slower relieving abdominal pain and distention and longer preoperative intestinal preparation time and hospitalization time than the stent during the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer.

图1 文献筛选流程图
表1 纳入文献基本特征及质量评分
图2 导管组与支架组安置时间对比
图3 导管组与支架组安置费用对比
图4 导管组与支架组安置成功率对比
图5 导管组与支架组安置后的腹痛腹胀缓解时间对比
图6 导管组与支架组安置前后肠管内径减小对比
图7 导管组与支架组安置后的肠道准备时间对比
图8 术后切口感染、吻合口漏等并发症发生率对比
图9 安置肠梗阻导管与安置腔内支架的平均住院时间对比
图10 腹胀缓解时间的漏斗图
[1]
van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Oldenburg B, et al. Collaborative Dutch Stent-In study group. Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(4): 344-352.
[2]
王世垚, 丁永强, 胡欢, 等. 自膨式金属支架在结直肠梗阻中的应用进展[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(10): 1281-1287.
[3]
尹超. 支架与肠梗阻导管在腹腔镜手术治疗梗阻性结直肠癌中的应用效果观察[J].中国医疗器械信息, 2019, 25(1): 84-85.
[4]
李伟. 肠道支架与肠梗阻导管在腹腔镜治疗大肠癌合并肠梗阻的应用比较及对血清DAO、MDA水平的影响[J/CD]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(1): 41-45.
[5]
孙青龙, 黄锐. 肠道支架与肠梗阻导管在腹腔镜手术治疗梗阻性结直肠癌中的效果对比分析[J]. 养生保健指南, 2019, (22): 258.
[6]
贾翼. 肠道支架与肠梗阻导管在梗阻性结直肠癌治疗中的效果比较[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2019, 13(19): 28-29.
[7]
常曦东, 邓旺生, 黄俊. 经肛门肠梗阻导管减压与经肠道支架植入术减压后腹腔镜手术治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的对比观察[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2018, 17(13): 1425-1427.
[8]
杨银山, 李林, 李玉雯, 等. 支架或导管缓解恶性大肠梗阻的临床疗效对比研究[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2018, 33(2): 251-253.
[9]
梁建国. 肠道支架与肠梗阻导管在腹腔镜手术治疗梗阻性结直肠癌中的应用比较[J]. 健康大视野, 2018, (17): 226.
[10]
刘伟, 李量, 郭甲民. 肠道支架与肠梗阻导管在腹腔镜手术治疗梗阻性结直肠癌中的效果比较[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2017, 32(10): 1716-1718.
[11]
张世义. 结肠镜下支架与梗阻导管治疗左半结直肠癌急性梗阻的研究[J]. 医药前沿, 2017, 7(4): 214-215.
[12]
陈松清. 肠道支架和肠梗阻导管在梗阻性结直肠癌患者进行腹腔镜手术中的应用效果[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2017, 15(23): 75-77.
[13]
黄熠. 支架与肠梗阻导管在腹腔镜手术左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻中的应用价值分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(35): 45-47.
[14]
杨克辉, 王科. 支架与肠梗阻导管应用于腹腔镜手术左半大肠癌并发肠梗阻治疗分析[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 291-293.
[15]
王东明, 王子谦, 刘晓杰. 经内镜支架与肠梗阻导管植入治疗大肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效对比研究[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2016, 16(81): 75-82.
[16]
陈震, 王西墨, 尹注增, 等. 肠道支架与梗阻导管治疗左半结直肠癌急性梗阻的研究[J].天津医药, 2014, 42(5): 481-484.
[17]
Li CY, Guo SB, Wang NF. Decompression of acute left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction: comparing transanal drainage tube with metallic stent[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2014,48(5): 37-42.
[18]
邢喆, 赵莹, 朱佳, 等. 经肛肠梗阻导管与经结肠镜放置金属支架在低位大肠癌性梗阻治疗中的对比研究[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2013, 12(3): 200-202.
[19]
杨莉, 李胜昔, 吕俊杰, 等. 经内镜放置金属支架及肠梗阻导管治疗低位大肠癌性梗阻的对比分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2010, 16(2): 169-171.
[20]
Athreya S, Moss J, Urquhart G, et al. Colorectal stenting for colonic obstruction: the indications, complications, effectiveness and outcome-5 year review[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2006, 60(1): 91-94.
[21]
Amelung FJ, Borstlap WAA, Consten ECJ, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcome between stent as bridge to surgery and emergency resection in patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction[J]. Br J Surg, 2019, 106(8): 1075-1086.
[22]
Ghazal AH, El-Shazly WG, Bessa SS, et al. Colonic endolumenal stenting devices and elective surgery versus emergency subtotal/total colectomy in the management of malignant obstructed left colon carcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(6): 1123-1129.
[23]
Lee JH, Emelogu I, Kukreja K, et al. Safety and efficacy of metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction in patients treated with bevacizumab[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 90(1): 116-124.
[24]
Tejero E, Mainar A, Fernández L, et al. New procedure for the treatment of colorectal neoplastic obstructions[J]. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 1994, 37: 1158-1159.
[25]
Arezzo A, Passera R, Lo Secco G, et al. Stent as bridge to surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction reduces adverse events and stoma rate compared with emergency surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2017, 86(3): 416-426.
[26]
赵日升, 王辉, 王磊, 等. 术前腔内支架与急诊手术治疗左半结肠和直肠癌肠梗阻的安全性与有效性Meta分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(7): 697-701.
[27]
Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Trastulli S, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in the management of intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Oncol, 2013, 22(1): 14-21.
[28]
Verstockt B, Van Driessche A, De Man M, et al.Ten-year survival after endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery in obstructing colon cancer[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2018, 87(3): 705-713.
[29]
苗鹏, 张光哲, 舒强.经肛肠梗阻导管在左半结肠癌性肠梗阻患者腹腔镜手术前的应用[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(2): 118-120.
[30]
郑威强, 章烈, 程勇. 梗阻性结直肠癌导管减压后3D腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1286-1290.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[5] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[6] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[9] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[10] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[11] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[12] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[13] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[14] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要