切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 326 -331. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.04.004

所属专题: 经自然腔道取标本手术学 文献

论著

经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究
韩俊毅1, 傅传刚1,(), 周主青1, 鲁兵1, 朱哲1, 高玮1, 杜涛1, 江期鑫1, 汤杰1, 向鹏程1   
  1. 1. 200120 上海,同济大学附属东方医院胃肠肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-19 出版日期:2018-08-25
  • 通信作者: 傅传刚
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点专科建设(No.PWZzk2017-26)

The clinical effects of trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis and trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis of 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection on rectal cancer

Junyi Han1, Chuangang Fu1,(), Zhuqing Zhou1, Bing Lu1, Zhe Zhu1, Wei Gao1, Tao Du1, Qixin Jiang1, Jie Tang1, Pengcheng Xiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2018-05-19 Published:2018-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Chuangang Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Chuangang, Email:
引用本文:

韩俊毅, 傅传刚, 周主青, 鲁兵, 朱哲, 高玮, 杜涛, 江期鑫, 汤杰, 向鹏程. 经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(04): 326-331.

Junyi Han, Chuangang Fu, Zhuqing Zhou, Bing Lu, Zhe Zhu, Wei Gao, Tao Du, Qixin Jiang, Jie Tang, Pengcheng Xiang. The clinical effects of trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis and trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis of 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection on rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(04): 326-331.

目的

探讨直肠癌经肛门直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术远切端两种处理方式对临床结果的影响。

方法

回顾性分析同济大学附属东方医院2016年1月至2018年3月接受经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术患者40例的临床资料,按照远切端处理不同方式分为2组:(1)经直肠标本取出(双吻合器法)组29例:经肛门直肠取出根治标本,再以直线切割关闭器切断并关闭远端直肠,采用传统双吻合器法吻合;(2)经直肠标本取出(单吻合器法)组11例:经肛门直肠取出根治标本,直肠残端以倒刺线全层荷包缝合关闭,行单吻合器直肠结肠端端吻合。两组均行预防性末端回肠造口术。分析比较两组术中(手术时间、出血量)、术后指标(肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后进食流质时间),并观察治疗期两组相关并发症。采用电话随访或调查的形式,对末端造口回纳术后1年以上患者采用Wexner失禁评分评估术后肛门括约肌功能。

结果

两组年龄、性别、BMI指数、肿瘤浸润深度、手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、进食流质时间、住院时间、并发症均无明显差异(P>0.05);根据WIS评分,随访时间超过1年的26例患者中,20例(76.9%)患者术后肛门功能良好(WIS评分≤10分),无严重肛门失禁患者。

结论

经肛门直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术中,采用单吻合器或双吻合器处理方式的临床效果无明显差异。

Objective

To assess the clinical outcomes of trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis and trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis of 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection on rectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological features of 40 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic anus-preserving operation for rectal cancer during January 2016 to March 2018 at Shanghai East Hospital. All patients were divided into two groups according to different anastomosis methods. (1) Twenty-nine cases were undergone trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis. Briefly, the specimen of rectum was moved out through the anus. Then an Endo linear cutting stapler was used to close the rectum. The anastomosis was accomplished with double-stapling technique. (2) Eleven cases were undergone trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis. After the specimen of rectum was moved out through the anus, the rectum was closed by purse-string suture with V-Loc stitches rather than the Endo linear cutting stapler. Then, the anastomosis was completed by a circular stapler in an end to end way. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, exsufflation time, complications rates were compared between two groups. Wexner incontinence scoring criteria was used to assess the function of anal sphincter after the operation.

Results

There was no significant difference between two groups in age, gender, BMI index, Tumor infiltration depth, operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, length of hospital stay, postoperative eating liquid time (P>0.05). According to WIS criteria, there were 76.9% patients whose anal sphincter function was good (WIS ≤10), and there was no patient with serious anal incontinence.

Conclusions

In 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer, either trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis or trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis should be considered in an individualized way.

图2 TRES-SSA组:肿瘤经直肠肛门拖出后,2A以3-0可吸收倒刺线行远端直肠荷包缝合,关闭远端直肠残端;2B再以28号管型吻合器行直肠结肠端端吻合
表1 两组一般情况比较
表2 两组临床指标对比(±s
表3 两组并发症发生率对比[n(%)]
表4 手术后各组Wexner评分
[1]
Leung AL, Cheung HY, Li MK. Advances in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review on NOTES and transanal extraction of specimen [J]. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 2014, 7(1): 11-16.
[2]
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group [J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007, 25(21): 3061-3068.
[3]
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group.Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial [J]. The lancet oncology, 2009, 10(1): 44-52.
[4]
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, et al. An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of ″natural orifice specimen extraction″ (N.O.S.E) [J]. Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2008, 51(7): 1120-1124.
[5]
王锡山.中国NOSES面临的挑战与展望 [J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(1): 2-7.
[6]
傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 等.中高位直肠癌和乙状结肠癌腹腔镜经直肠标本取出手术的保护措施 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1151-1155.
[7]
Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer [J]. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2011, 54(8): 963-968.
[8]
Franklin ME, Jr., Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2013, 17(Suppl 1): S63-67.
[9]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[10]
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28(8): 2342-2348.
[11]
Denost Q, Adam JP, Pontallier A, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer [J]. Annals of surgery, 2015, 261(1): 138-143.
[12]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[13]
张斌, 刘泉龙, 赵玉涓, 等.腹腔镜低位直肠癌部分、次全和完全经括约肌间切除术式的肿瘤学结果及肛门功能比较 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(8): 904-909.
[14]
Zhou HT, Zhou ZX, Liang JW, et al. Analysis of 21 cases treated by total laparoscopic rectosigmoid cancer surgery with transanal natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2013, 93(26): 2082-2084.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[12] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[13] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?