切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 326 -331. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.04.004

所属专题: 经自然腔道取标本手术学 文献

论著

经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究
韩俊毅1, 傅传刚1,(), 周主青1, 鲁兵1, 朱哲1, 高玮1, 杜涛1, 江期鑫1, 汤杰1, 向鹏程1   
  1. 1. 200120 上海,同济大学附属东方医院胃肠肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-19 出版日期:2018-08-25
  • 通信作者: 傅传刚
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点专科建设(No.PWZzk2017-26)

The clinical effects of trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis and trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis of 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection on rectal cancer

Junyi Han1, Chuangang Fu1,(), Zhuqing Zhou1, Bing Lu1, Zhe Zhu1, Wei Gao1, Tao Du1, Qixin Jiang1, Jie Tang1, Pengcheng Xiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2018-05-19 Published:2018-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Chuangang Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Chuangang, Email:
引用本文:

韩俊毅, 傅传刚, 周主青, 鲁兵, 朱哲, 高玮, 杜涛, 江期鑫, 汤杰, 向鹏程. 经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(04): 326-331.

Junyi Han, Chuangang Fu, Zhuqing Zhou, Bing Lu, Zhe Zhu, Wei Gao, Tao Du, Qixin Jiang, Jie Tang, Pengcheng Xiang. The clinical effects of trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis and trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis of 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection on rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(04): 326-331.

目的

探讨直肠癌经肛门直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术远切端两种处理方式对临床结果的影响。

方法

回顾性分析同济大学附属东方医院2016年1月至2018年3月接受经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术患者40例的临床资料,按照远切端处理不同方式分为2组:(1)经直肠标本取出(双吻合器法)组29例:经肛门直肠取出根治标本,再以直线切割关闭器切断并关闭远端直肠,采用传统双吻合器法吻合;(2)经直肠标本取出(单吻合器法)组11例:经肛门直肠取出根治标本,直肠残端以倒刺线全层荷包缝合关闭,行单吻合器直肠结肠端端吻合。两组均行预防性末端回肠造口术。分析比较两组术中(手术时间、出血量)、术后指标(肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后进食流质时间),并观察治疗期两组相关并发症。采用电话随访或调查的形式,对末端造口回纳术后1年以上患者采用Wexner失禁评分评估术后肛门括约肌功能。

结果

两组年龄、性别、BMI指数、肿瘤浸润深度、手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、进食流质时间、住院时间、并发症均无明显差异(P>0.05);根据WIS评分,随访时间超过1年的26例患者中,20例(76.9%)患者术后肛门功能良好(WIS评分≤10分),无严重肛门失禁患者。

结论

经肛门直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术中,采用单吻合器或双吻合器处理方式的临床效果无明显差异。

Objective

To assess the clinical outcomes of trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis and trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis of 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection on rectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological features of 40 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic anus-preserving operation for rectal cancer during January 2016 to March 2018 at Shanghai East Hospital. All patients were divided into two groups according to different anastomosis methods. (1) Twenty-nine cases were undergone trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis. Briefly, the specimen of rectum was moved out through the anus. Then an Endo linear cutting stapler was used to close the rectum. The anastomosis was accomplished with double-stapling technique. (2) Eleven cases were undergone trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis. After the specimen of rectum was moved out through the anus, the rectum was closed by purse-string suture with V-Loc stitches rather than the Endo linear cutting stapler. Then, the anastomosis was completed by a circular stapler in an end to end way. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, exsufflation time, complications rates were compared between two groups. Wexner incontinence scoring criteria was used to assess the function of anal sphincter after the operation.

Results

There was no significant difference between two groups in age, gender, BMI index, Tumor infiltration depth, operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, length of hospital stay, postoperative eating liquid time (P>0.05). According to WIS criteria, there were 76.9% patients whose anal sphincter function was good (WIS ≤10), and there was no patient with serious anal incontinence.

Conclusions

In 3D laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer, either trans-rectal extraction of specimen with double stapling anastomosis or trans-rectal extraction of specimen with single stapling anastomosis should be considered in an individualized way.

图2 TRES-SSA组:肿瘤经直肠肛门拖出后,2A以3-0可吸收倒刺线行远端直肠荷包缝合,关闭远端直肠残端;2B再以28号管型吻合器行直肠结肠端端吻合
表1 两组一般情况比较
表2 两组临床指标对比(±s
表3 两组并发症发生率对比[n(%)]
表4 手术后各组Wexner评分
[1]
Leung AL, Cheung HY, Li MK. Advances in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review on NOTES and transanal extraction of specimen [J]. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 2014, 7(1): 11-16.
[2]
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group [J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007, 25(21): 3061-3068.
[3]
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group.Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial [J]. The lancet oncology, 2009, 10(1): 44-52.
[4]
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, et al. An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of ″natural orifice specimen extraction″ (N.O.S.E) [J]. Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2008, 51(7): 1120-1124.
[5]
王锡山.中国NOSES面临的挑战与展望 [J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(1): 2-7.
[6]
傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 等.中高位直肠癌和乙状结肠癌腹腔镜经直肠标本取出手术的保护措施 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1151-1155.
[7]
Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer [J]. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2011, 54(8): 963-968.
[8]
Franklin ME, Jr., Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2013, 17(Suppl 1): S63-67.
[9]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[10]
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28(8): 2342-2348.
[11]
Denost Q, Adam JP, Pontallier A, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer [J]. Annals of surgery, 2015, 261(1): 138-143.
[12]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[13]
张斌, 刘泉龙, 赵玉涓, 等.腹腔镜低位直肠癌部分、次全和完全经括约肌间切除术式的肿瘤学结果及肛门功能比较 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(8): 904-909.
[14]
Zhou HT, Zhou ZX, Liang JW, et al. Analysis of 21 cases treated by total laparoscopic rectosigmoid cancer surgery with transanal natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2013, 93(26): 2082-2084.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[8] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[9] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[10] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[11] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[12] 张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.
[13] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[14] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES Ⅳ式)中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
[15] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
阅读次数
全文


摘要