切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 460 -465. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2023.06.004

NOSES专栏

经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析
张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭()   
  1. 450000 郑州,联勤保障部队第九八八医院普通外科
    450000 郑州大学第一附属医院结直肠肛门外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-05 出版日期:2023-12-25
  • 通信作者: 张春旭
  • 基金资助:
    河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(No. SB201903034)

Analysis of feasibility and short-term efficacy of transvaginal single-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Jixin Zhang, Junhong Hu, Shuang Xie, Zuyin Wu, Chunxu Zhang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, No.988 Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Zhengzhou 450000, China
    Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
  • Received:2023-04-05 Published:2023-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Chunxu Zhang
引用本文:

张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.

Jixin Zhang, Junhong Hu, Shuang Xie, Zuyin Wu, Chunxu Zhang. Analysis of feasibility and short-term efficacy of transvaginal single-port laparoscopic appendectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 460-465.

目的

探讨使用传统单孔腹腔镜器械实行经阴道阑尾切除术的安全性、可行性及近期疗效,进而评估其临床应用价值。

方法

前瞻性纳入2019年11月至2021年5月间联勤保障部队第九八八医院普通外科收治的女性急性阑尾炎患者30例,15例施行经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术为观察组,15例施行传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术为对照组。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后1、2、3天疼痛评分、排气时间、术后并发症、切口满意度、住院时间、住院费用、术后1、3天的血清炎症指标间的差异,同时对观察组术前及术后4、8、12个月性功能进行随访。

结果

30例手术均顺利完成,无中转常规腹腔镜及开腹手术;在出血量(t=-0.410,P=0.685),术后1天(t=-1.720,P=0.096)、3天(t=-0.877,P=0.388)C反应蛋白(CRP)和术后1天(t=-1.797,P=0.083)、3天(t=-0.602,P=0.552)IL-6方面两组差异无统计学意义;在术后1天(t=-3.191,P=0.003)、2天(t=-2.084,P=0.046)疼痛评分,排气时间(t=-2.259,P=0.032),住院时间(t=-3.497,P=0.002)方面观察组要优于对照组;但在手术时间(t=6.231,P<0.001)和住院费用(t=3.276,P=0.003)方面观察组要高于对照组;观察组术后出现并发症2例,对照组1例,两组差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.370,P=1.000);两组术后1个月随访患者切口满意度均为93.33%;观察组术前及术后4、8、12个月女性性功能指数(FSFI)分别为(25.64±1.60)分、(25.62±1.21)分、(26.09±1.39)分、(26.63±1.30)分,组间比较差异无统计学意义(F=1.759,P=0.166)。

结论

应用传统单孔腹腔镜器械经阴道阑尾切除术是安全、可行的,对术后性功能无影响,近期疗效满意,无痕美容效果确切,是已婚经产妇且美容要求较高阑尾炎患者的可选术式。

Objective

To investigate the safety, feasibility and short-term efficacy of transvaginal appendectomy with traditional single-port laparoscopic instruments, and to evaluate its clinical application value.

Methods

Thirty female patients with acute appendicitis were prospectively collected from November 2019 to May 2021 at the Department of General Surgery, No.988 Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. Fifteen patients underwent transvaginal appendectomy with the single-port laparoscopic instrument as the observation group. Another 15 patients underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy as the control. The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative pain score, postoperativ exhaust time, postoperative complications, incision satisfaction, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative serum inflammation indexes between the two groups were compared. The sexual function (before surgery and 4th, 8th, 12th months after surgery) was observed in the observation group.

Results

All 30 operations were completed without transfer. There were no significant differences in the bleeding volume (t=-0.410, P=0.685), the CRP at 1st (t=-1.720, P=0.096), 3rd (t=-0.877, P=0.388) days and the IL-6 at 1st (t=-1.797, P=0.083), 3rd (t=-0.602, P=0.552) days after the operation. The observation group was superior to the control group in terms of postoperative pain score (1st day: t=-3.191, P=0.003; 2nd day: t=-2.084, P=0.046), first exhaust time(t=-2.259, P=0.032) and hospitalization time (t=-3.497, P=0.002). But the observation group was higher than the control group in the operation time (t=6.231, P<0.001) and the hospitalization expense (t=3.276, P=0.003). Two complications occurred in the observation group and one complication in the control group, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (χ2=0.370, P=1.000). The incision satisfaction in the both groups was 93.33% at one month after the operation. The mean FSFI of preoperation and 4th, 8th, and 12th months after operation were (25.64±1.60), (25.62±1.21), (26.09±1.39), (26.63±1.30), there was no statistically significant differences between the groups (F=1.759, P=0.166).

Conclusions

Transvaginal appendectomy with traditional single-port laparoscopic instruments is safe and feasible, has no effect on sexual function. The short-term effect is satisfactory, and the scar-free cosmetic effect is definite. And it is an optional operation for married multipara with higher cosmetic requirements.

图1 暴露阴道后穹隆并切开
图2 置入单孔Port建立气腹
图3 显露阑尾
图4 超声刀离断阑尾系膜
图5 Hem-o-lok夹于阑尾根部夹闭
图6 离断阑尾
图7 经阴道取出阑尾
图8 缝合阴道后穹隆
图9 阴道内置入碘伏纱布,术毕
表1 两组患者术前基本资料对比(±s
表2 两组患者术中术后指标对比[±s,例(%)]
表3 术前和术后4、8、12个月的FSFI评分比较(±sn=15)
[1]
李世宽, 李春桥, 李元博, 等. 复发性阑尾炎的临床特征分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(8): 786-790.
[2]
Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(10000): 1278-1287.
[3]
Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2015, 313(23): 2340-2348.
[4]
邹来宾, 何天, 陈亮, 等. 腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗根部坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1147-1149.
[5]
王锡山. 经自然腔道取标本手术和经自然腔道内镜手术及经肛全直肠系膜切除术的应用前景与挑战[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(8): 856-861.
[6]
Guan X, Hu XY, Jiang Z, et al. Short-term and oncological outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer in China: a national database study of 5055 patients[J]. Science Bulletin, 2022, 67(13): 1331-1334.
[7]
尹克宁, 卓凡. 单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(2): 109-112.
[8]
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function[J]. J Sex Marital Ther, 2000, 26(2): 191-208.
[9]
Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2016, 18(11): 34.
[10]
秦新裕.胃肠外科在微创时代的发展趋势和展望[J].中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(1): 3-6.
[11]
梁俊杰, 由田, 刘志龙, 等. 瘢痕隐藏式与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(6): 517-520.
[12]
王锡山. 3D腹腔镜技术在微创外科中的现状与思考[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2014, 3(3): 177-179.
[13]
Bulian DR, Kaehler G, Magdeburg R, et al. Analysis of the first 217 appendectomies of the German NOTES Registry[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(3): 534.
[14]
Yang E, Nie D, Li ZY. Comparison of major clinical outcomes between transvaginal notes and traditional laparoscopic surgery: asystematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Surg Res, 2019, 244: 278-290.
[1] 郑伟军, 郑超, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 新生儿急性阑尾炎17例诊治分析并文献回顾[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 291-293.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[4] 李凯, 张志远, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 一种可拆卸组装的腹腔镜手术器械在单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 250-250.
[5] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 经阴道膀胱膨出前盆补片修补术 + 阴道后壁修补术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 128-128.
[6] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[7] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[8] 王酉, 严斌, 狄文, 楼微华. 经脐单孔腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术在早期子宫内膜癌手术中的探讨[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 173-176.
[9] 刘洪云, 李翠, 张海堂, 张玉英, 黄成香. 经脐单孔腹腔镜技术在子宫内膜癌手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 182-184.
[10] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[11] 李月刚, 关旭, 赵志勋, 权继传, 庄孟, 汤坚强. 结直肠癌NOSES手术的国际研究现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 321-328.
[12] 朱志, 张鑫炜, 谭文斐, 高梓茗, 赵睿涵, 杨野, 王世洋, 智冬梅, 赵鑫, 尹长欣, 高畅远, 王锡山, 王振宁, 李凯, 周海涛. 直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术在日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 329-334.
[13] 白杨, 李国宾, 胡军红. 腹部无辅助切口经肛门外翻切除标本的达芬奇机器人辅助下低位直肠癌根治术一例(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 260-264.
[14] 张继新, 谢爽, 王雪莲, 武祖印, 梁延洋, 张春旭. 经鼻插入肠梗阻导管联合NOSES微创治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 189-196.
[15] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?