切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 332 -336. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.04.005

所属专题: 机器人手术 经自然腔道取标本手术学 文献

论著

机器人腹部无切口直肠癌前切除术
牛正川1, 韦烨1,(), 朱德祥1, 许剑民1,()   
  1. 1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-20 出版日期:2018-08-25
  • 通信作者: 韦烨, 许剑民
  • 基金资助:
    上海结直肠肿瘤微创工程技术研究中心(No.17D2252600)

Robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer without abdominal incision

Zhengchuan Niu1, Ye Wei1,(), Dexiang Zhu1, Jianmin Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2018-06-20 Published:2018-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Ye Wei, Jianmin Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Ye, Email:
    Xu Jianmin, Email:
引用本文:

牛正川, 韦烨, 朱德祥, 许剑民. 机器人腹部无切口直肠癌前切除术[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(04): 332-336.

Zhengchuan Niu, Ye Wei, Dexiang Zhu, Jianmin Xu. Robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer without abdominal incision[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(04): 332-336.

目的

经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)可避免腹部切口,具有美观、术后恢复快的优势。本中心采用NOSES术式,创新性地开展了机器人无切口直肠癌前切除术。

方法

本研究纳入2013年10月至2015年12月期间共19例早期完成该手术的患者,分析其临床病理特征,围手术期相关结果及术后随访资料。

结果

所有手术均成功实施,术后恢复良好,均顺利出院。随访期间,未发生严重腹、盆腔感染;无明显排尿困难、性功能障碍和排便失禁;肿瘤学结果较好。

结论

结果证实,机器人腹部无切口直肠癌前切除术安全、可行,但其远期结果评估需增加样本量,并行进一步随访。

Objective

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) can avoid additional abdominal incisions, improve cosmetic outcomes and have quick postoperative recovery. In our center, robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer without additional abdominal incision was performed innovatively using NOSES approach.

Methods

During October 2013 to December 2015, totally 19 patients undergoing this surgery were included into presented retrospective study. Patients′ clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative related outcomes, and follow-up outcomes were recorded.

Results

All operations were carried out successfully. Patients recovered well after operation and discharged uneventfully. During the follow-up period, there is no serious abdominal and pelvic infections. No dysuria, sexual function disorder and fecal incontinence were found, and oncological outcomes were acceptable.

Conclusion

Taken together, robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer without abdominal incision is safe and feasible. Still, its long-term outcomes require increasing sample size and further investigation.

图1 机器人NOSES经直肠外翻切除、标本取出。1A通过肠壁切口将底砧座放入近端肠腔;1B经肛门直肠外翻;1C直视下切除标本;1D残端推回腹腔内行端端吻合术
表1 患者基线指标
表2 围手术期指标
表3 术后并发症
[1]
Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, et al. Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J]. Arch Surg, 2008, 143(8): 762-767.
[2]
Shussman N, Wexner SD. Current status of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(41): 15125-15134.
[3]
Mohd Azman ZA, Kim SH. A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer [J]. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 1(5): 1-7.
[4]
Staderini F, Foppa C, Minuzzo A, et al. Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art [J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2016, 8(11): 757-771.
[5]
Tang B, Zhang C, Li C, et al. Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Series of 392 Cases and Mid-Term Outcomes from A Single Center in China [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(3): 569-576.
[6]
Sammour T, Malakorn S, Bednarski BK, et al. Oncological Outcomes After Robotic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Database [J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(3): 521-526.
[7]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[8]
D′Hoore A, Wolthuis AM. Laparoscopic low anterior resection and transanal pull-through for low rectal cancer: a Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) technique [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2011, 13 Suppl 7: 28-31.
[9]
Wang Q, Wang C, Sun DH, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with natural orifice specimen extraction [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(5): 750-754.
[10]
Franklin ME Jr, Liang S, Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients [J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 127-132.
[11]
Baek SJ, Kim CH, Cho MS, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy [J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(6): 1419-1424.
[12]
Ooi BS, Quah HM, Fu CW, et al. Laparoscopic high anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for early rectal cancer [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2009, 13(1): 61-64.
[13]
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, et al. An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of ″natural orifice specimen extraction″ (N.O.S.E) [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(7): 1120-1124.
[14]
Pearl JP, Marks JM, Ponsky JL. Hybrid surgery: combined laparoscopy and natural orifice surgery [J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2008, 18(2): 325-332.
[15]
Franklin ME Jr, Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2013, 17(Suppl 1): S63-67.
[16]
Choi GS, Park IJ, Kang BM, et al. A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(12): 2831-2835.
[17]
Kang J, Min BS, Hur H, et al. Transanal specimen extraction in robotic rectal cancer surgery [J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(1): 133-136.
[18]
Yeh YS, Chen MJ, Tsai HL, et al. Transanal inside-out rectal resection for ultra-low rectal cancer [J]. J Invest Surg, 2012, 25(6): 375-380.
[19]
Corman ML. Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. A new method of excising the two upper portions of the rectum and the lower segment of the sigmoid flexure of the colon--by H. Widenham Maunsell [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1981, 24(8): 649-654.
[20]
Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, et al. New technique for rectal division in laparoscopic anterior resection--with video [J]. World J Surg, 2008, 32(9): 2095-2100.
[21]
Montalti R, Berardi G, Patriti A, et al. Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(27): 8441-8451.
[22]
Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2014, 18(4): 816-830.
[23]
Hottenrott C, Katsios C. Sparing minilaparotomy in robotic low anterior resection for cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(11): 2918-2920.
[24]
Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Miller AS, et al. Clinical and physiological evaluation of anorectal eversion during restorative proctocolectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 1995, 82(10): 1391-1394.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?