切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 50 -53. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.01.009

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

开环肛门镜应用于组织选择性直肠黏膜切除吻合术的疗效及安全性评价
苏丹1, 刘智敏1, 张迪1, 张恒1, 万星阳1, 李丽1, 彭慧1, 任东林1,()   
  1. 1. 510655 中山大学附属第六医院中西医结合肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-20 出版日期:2019-02-25
  • 通信作者: 任东林
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技厅项目(No.2014A020215011)

The safety and efficiency of open loop analscope on the application of tissue-selective therapy stapler

Dan Su1, Zhimin Liu1, Di Zhang1, Heng Zhang1, Xingyang Wan1, Li Li1, Hui Peng1, Donglin Ren1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Coloproctology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Gastrointestinal & Anal Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2018-06-20 Published:2019-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Donglin Ren
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ren Donglin, Email:
引用本文:

苏丹, 刘智敏, 张迪, 张恒, 万星阳, 李丽, 彭慧, 任东林. 开环肛门镜应用于组织选择性直肠黏膜切除吻合术的疗效及安全性评价[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(01): 50-53.

Dan Su, Zhimin Liu, Di Zhang, Heng Zhang, Xingyang Wan, Li Li, Hui Peng, Donglin Ren. The safety and efficiency of open loop analscope on the application of tissue-selective therapy stapler[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(01): 50-53.

目的

将一种新型开环肛门镜,应用于组织选择性直肠黏膜切除吻合术(TST)中,并评估此方法的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

选择Ⅲ、Ⅳ度脱垂性痔患者48例为研究对象,使用开环肛门镜进行经肛吻合器手术。观察手术操作及完成情况、切除组织量、手术耗时、术后住院时间、术后疼痛评分、肛门坠胀感、有无并发症等情况。

结果

48例患者均顺利完成手术,无中止手术或中途变更手术方案。术中操作顺利,无器械异常、脱钉、不能击发等情况。术中出血少,未出现难以控制的出血。平均手术耗时(21.3±5.5)分钟,平均切除组织量(11.6±1.9)mL,术后平均住院时间为(4.8±1.7)天。术后随访6个月,全组患者均未出现肛管直肠的临床狭窄及潜在的亚临床相对狭窄。

结论

将开环肛门镜应用于TST中,可以实现选择性切除足够的脱垂黏膜,同时保存部分正常的直肠壁,可从技术源头上避免直肠狭窄、直肠阴道瘘等严重并发症的出现,同时术后疼痛、肛门坠胀感、排便感觉障碍等症状也相对较轻,可视为一种操作简单、安全、有效的手术方式。

Objective

A new type of open-loop anoscope was used in tissue selective rectal mucosal resection and anastomosis (TST), and the clinical efficacy and safety of this method were evaluated.

Methods

Forty-eight patients with grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ prolapsed hemorrhoids were selected as subjects, and an anal anastomat was performed using an open-loop anoscope. Observe the operation and completion, the amount of tissue removed, the time spent on surgery, the length of postoperative hospital stay, the postoperative pain score, the feeling of anal bulge, and the presence or absence of complications.

Results

All 48 patients successfully completed the operation without interruption or midway change of the surgical plan. Intraoperative operation is smooth, no abnormalities in the instrument, nail removal, and failure to fire. There was less bleeding during the operation and no uncontrollable bleeding occurred. The average operation time was (21.3±5.5) minutes, the average tissue resection amount was (11.6±1.9) mL, and the average postoperative hospital stay was (4.8±1.7) days. After 6 months of follow-up, there was no clinical stenosis and potential subclinical relative stenosis in the entire group.

Conclusions

The application of open-loop anal mirror in TST can selectively remove enough prolapsed mucosa while preserving part of the normal rectal wall, avoiding serious complications such as rectal stenosis and rectal vaginal fistula from the technical source. Postoperative pain, anal bulge, and defecation dysfunction are also relatively mild, which can be regarded as a simple, safe and effective surgical procedure.

图1 开环肛门镜示意图(中间连接部分为档板)
图2 应用开环肛门镜TST手术步骤。2A:术前检查,见环状内痔脱垂,左右侧为主,前壁脱垂较少;2B:置入开环肛门镜,档板位于直肠前壁;2C开环荷包缝合;2D:完成击发,显示猫耳朵;2E切除外痔,闭锁缝合、术毕;2F开环吻合器切除标本
表1 48例开环TST手术患者资料统计
[1]
Lin HC, Lian L, Xie SK, et al. The tissue-selecting technique: segmental stapled hemorrhoidopexy [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(11): 1320-1324.
[2]
Lin HC, Ren DL, He QL, et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2012, 16(5): 337-343.
[3]
Lin HC, He QL, Ren DL, et al. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids [J]. Surg Today, 2012, 42(9): 868-875.
[4]
Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure [M]. 6th. Rome: World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1998: 777-784.
[5]
Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus rectum and colon [M]. 4th edn. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1980: 93-149.
[6]
Gerjy R, Nystrom PO. Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2007, 9(8): 754-757.
[7]
Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse [J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 182(1): 64-68.
[8]
Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000, 43(12): 1666-1675.
[9]
Kirsch JJ, Staude G, Herold A. The Longo and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective comparative study of 300 patients [J]. Chirurg, 2001, 72(2): 180-185.
[10]
Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 2001, 88(8): 1049-1053.
[1] 帕丽旦·热吉甫, 姑丽尼格尔·吾不力哈斯木, 张媛, 杨武明, 路明. 四种手术方式治疗痔病的网状Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 74-80.
[2] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[3] 张剑明, 叶文慧, 牟廷裕, 蓝孝亮, 邓海军. 腹腔镜全结直肠切除、回肠J型储袋-肛管吻合术近期并发症及防治策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 388-395.
[4] 张臣熊, 吴雨凝, 谭皓, 续菡, 张迪, 孙锋. 肛周坏死性筋膜炎感染路径浅析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 353-362.
[5] 王勋, 石荣, 王菁. 新型可自由选择调节开环的痔上黏膜手术暴露辅助器械在痔吻合器手术中应用的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 319-325.
[6] 张睿, 陈艳妮, 侯孝涛, 陈浩, 麻琦瑶, 倪敏. 老年出口梗阻型便秘患者肛门直肠测压特点分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 139-144.
[7] 解雯, 郑雪平, 郭高正, 王怡明, 石佳勇, 吴自然, 杜美萱. 改良TROPIS联合置管引流术治疗复杂性肛瘘的疗效及安全性研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 114-119.
[8] 袁晨晨, 薛蓉, 金纯, 郑晨果, 周崇俊. 吻合器痔上黏膜适形切除钉合术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 120-126.
[9] 陈少虹, 李永富, 罗刚沣, 黄炫璋, 龚莉, 颜显欣, 马民. RPH联合MMH与PPH治疗重度混合痔的疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 621-630.
[10] 胡邦, 邹齐, 陆立, 任东林. 《中国痔病诊疗指南(2020)》解读及其与欧美指南的对比[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 561-571.
[11] 薛雅红, 刘飞, 凌艳, 王小峰. 经会阴及经肛门三维超声技术对功能性肛门直肠疾病的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 334-341.
[12] 高英杰, 王阳, 王丽红, 毕文静, 刘卫民. VWF基因突变导致混合痔术后大出血一例报告并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 496-498.
[13] 何安琪, 刘刚. 溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌的外科治疗[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(11): 814-818.
[14] 张立, 田泽阳, 张海旺, 徐晨龙, 方多多, 倪秀茹. 选择性痔上黏膜吻合术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗重度混合痔的效果比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(09): 678-682.
[15] 李贞娟, 丁辉, 王艺, 胡珊珊, 白阳秋, 杨惠, 邝胜利, 张慧敏, 徐闪闪, 李修岭. 参照肛直线的内镜下套扎术治疗Ⅰ-Ⅲ度内痔临床效果研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 76-81.
阅读次数
全文


摘要