切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 120 -126. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2022.02.005

论著

吻合器痔上黏膜适形切除钉合术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔的临床疗效分析
袁晨晨1, 薛蓉1, 金纯1, 郑晨果1, 周崇俊,1   
  1. 1. 325000 温州医科大学附属第二医院、育英儿童医院肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-04-25
  • 通信作者: 周崇俊
  • 基金资助:
    温州市基础性科研项目(Y20210938)

Clinical effect observations of the treatment of grades Ⅲ~Ⅳ prolapsing hemorrhoids with conformal resection of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids

Chenchen Yuan1, Rong Xue1, Chun Jin1, Chenguo Zheng1, Chongjun Zhou,1   

  1. 1. Department of Coloproctology, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
  • Received:2021-09-13 Published:2022-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Chongjun Zhou
引用本文:

袁晨晨, 薛蓉, 金纯, 郑晨果, 周崇俊. 吻合器痔上黏膜适形切除钉合术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 120-126.

Chenchen Yuan, Rong Xue, Chun Jin, Chenguo Zheng, Chongjun Zhou. Clinical effect observations of the treatment of grades Ⅲ~Ⅳ prolapsing hemorrhoids with conformal resection of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(02): 120-126.

目的

观察吻合器痔上黏膜适形切除钉合术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔的临床疗效。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2019年1月~2020年1月在温州医科大学附属第二医院、育英儿童医院确诊并接受手术的Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔患者,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为适形切除组和传统痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)组。回顾性分析比较两组手术相关指标、术后1年并发症等情况。

结果

共有275例患者符合纳入标准,77例患者接受适形切除术,198例患者接受传统PPH术,两组在性别构成、年龄、病程及痔分度等方面差异无统计学意义。适形切除组术中失血量(Z=-6.472,P<0.01)和术后24 h疼痛评分(t=-5.152,P<0.01)明显低于传统PPH组,手术时间(均值35.2 vs. 31.9 min,t=-2.871;P=0.004)略长于传统PPH组。但两组住院天数(t=-0.467,P>0.05)及住院费用(t=1.141,P>0.05)指标差异无统计学意义。适形切除组术后总体并发症发生率明显低于传统PPH组[9.1%(7/77)vs. 35.8%(71/198),χ2=19.55;P=0.000],其中术后复发[2.6%(2/77)vs. 10.1%(20/198),χ2=4.241;P=0.039]明显低于传统PPH组,中度肛门狭窄及Ⅱ度肛门失禁程度以上并发症两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但轻度肛门狭窄适形切除组明显低于传统PPH组[1.3%(1/77)vs. 8.1%(16/198),χ2=3.305;P=0.069],I度肛门失禁适形切除组明显低于传统PPH组[0%(0/77)vs. 7.1%(14/198),χ2=4.366;P=0.037]。术后慢性疼痛(P>0.05)、术后出血(P>0.05)、肛周分泌物(χ2=0.870,P>0.05)、肛门坠胀感(χ2=0.010,P>0.05)在两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。适形切除组无术后出血、术后慢性疼痛及肛门失禁的并发症发生。

结论

吻合器痔上黏膜适形切除钉合术可安全有效地用于Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔的治疗,具有较轻的术后疼痛,较低的术后并发症和复发率,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To observe the clinical effect of the treatment of grades Ⅲ~Ⅳ prolapsing hemorrhoids with conformal resection of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. From January 2019 to January 2020, patients with grade III~IV circumferential prolapsing hemorrhoids who were diagnosed and operated in the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were collected. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into conformal resection group and traditional procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group. The operation related indexes and postoperative complications within 1 year of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared.

Results

A total of 275 patients met the inclusion criteria. 77 patients received conformal resection and 198 patients received traditional PPH. There was no significant difference in gender, age, course of disease and grades of hemorrhoids between the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss (Z=-6.472, P<0.01) and 24 h postoperative pain score (t=-5.152, P<0.01) in the conformal resection group were significantly lower than those in the traditional PPH group, and the operation time (mean 35.2 vs. 31.9 min, t=-2.871; P=0.004) was slightly longer than that in the traditional PPH group. However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization days (t=-0.467, P>0.05) and hospitalization expenses (t=1.141, P>0.05) between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications in the conformal resection group was significantly lower than that in the traditional PPH Group [9.1%(7/77) vs. 35.8%(71/198), χ2=19.55; P=0.000], in which postoperative recurrence [2.6%(2/77) vs. 10.1%(20/198), χ2=4.241; P=0.039] was significantly lower than that of the traditional PPH group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the complications of moderate anal stenosis and degree II anal incontinence (P>0.05), but the conformal resection group of mild anal stenosis was significantly lower than that of the traditional PPH Group [1.3% (1/77) vs. 8.1%(16/198), χ2=3.305; P=0.069], and the conformal resection group of degree I anal incontinence was significantly lower than that of the traditional PPH Group [0% (0/77) vs. 7.1%(14/198), χ2=4.366; P=0.037]. There was no significant difference in postoperative chronic pain (P>0.05), postoperative bleeding (P>0.05), perianal secretion (χ2=0.870,P>0.05) and anal distension (χ2=0.010,P>0.05) between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no complications of postoperative bleeding, postoperative chronic pain and anal incontinence in the conformal resection group.

Conclusion

Conformal resection of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids is safe and effective for the treatment of III~IV prolapsing hemorrhoids, with less postoperative pain, lower postoperative complications and recurrence rate, which is worthy of clinical application.

图1 吻合器痔上黏膜适形切除钉合术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度环状混合痔的手术步骤。1A:用allis钳及肛门镜暴露痔疮;1B:用2-0可吸收线行荷包缝合;1C:插入吻合器及钢板,钢板挡住需保留黏膜;1D:收紧荷包缝线并打结;1E:旋紧吻合器后击发;1F:退出吻合器,分离黏膜桥,结扎黏膜桥的自由端;1G:切除外痔及其下静脉丛;1H:修整肛周皮肤并加以止血
图2 显示根据痔核数目、大小和位置,选择需要保留的相对正常的黏膜。2A组:保留前方和后方;2B组:保留左前和右后方;2C组:左前和后方
图3 自备窄边压肠板
表1 两组基线资料对比[
xˉ
±s,例(%)]
表2 手术及相关临床指标对比[
xˉ
±s,(中位数,四分位间距)]
表3 并发症对比[例(%)]
[1]
中国中西医结合学会大肠肛门病专业委员会. 中国痔病诊疗指南(2020)[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2020, 26(5): 519-533.
[2]
谭嗣伟, 李东冰, 张立军, 等. 痔上黏膜非环切吻合术治疗内痔[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(8): 670-672.
[3]
Zhu J, Ding J, Zhao K, et al. Complications after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids for circular hemorrhoids[J]. 2012, 15(12): 1252-1255.
[4]
Basso L, Pescatori M, La Torre F, et al. Emerging technologies in coloproctology: results of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery Logbook of Adverse Events[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2013, 17(2): 207-211.
[5]
Ruan N, Chen Z, Lin XB. Efficacy comparison of tissue selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 16(7): 645-647.
[6]
Sturiale A, Fabiani B, Menconi C, et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a survey study with mean follow-up of 12 years[J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2018, 22(9): 689-696.
[7]
李岩. TST与PPH治疗脱垂性内痔和混合痔比较[J].现代临床医学, 2018, 44(2): 128-130.
[8]
Chen Y, Cheng Y, Wang Q, et al. Modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Lower recurrence, higher satisfaction[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021, 9(1): 36-46.
[9]
Longo A. Treatment of Hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapler suturing device : A new procedure[J].Proceeding of the world congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1998, 32(10): 334-339.
[10]
高志冬, 王有利, 韩龙, 等. 吻合器经肛门直肠切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术治疗Ⅳ度痔的对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2015, 30(9): 719-722.
[11]
王万里, 邓台燕, 樊文彬, 等. 痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)再思考[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(5): 514-519.
[12]
王雅娴, 吴燕兰, 王业皇. 王业皇教授治疗脱垂性痔病临证经验探析[J]. 成都中医药大学学报, 2018, 41(4): 83-86.
[13]
阮宁, 陈志华, 林夏冰. 选择性痔上黏膜切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度内痔的临床疗效对比[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2013, 16(7): 645-647.
[14]
陈祖清, 梁瑞文, 张国兴, 等. 痔上黏膜次环切术在环状混合痔治疗中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(12): 1107-1110.
[15]
廖健南, 邱磊, 谢沛标, 等. PPH治疗内痔发生术后大出血的危险因素分析及对策[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2014, 20(1): 26-29.
[16]
中国中西医结合学会大肠肛门病专业委员会. 经肛吻合器治疗脱垂性痔中国专家共识[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(12): 1135-1138.
[17]
王守练, 郑林海, 倪晓春, 等. 选择性痔上黏膜切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度痔的疗效比较[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2017, 44(8): 535-538.
[18]
帕丽旦·热吉甫, 杨润清, 张媛, 等. PPH术后吻合口狭窄危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(5): 482-486.
[19]
Thekkinkattil DK, Dunham RJ, O'Herlihy S, et al. Measurement of anal cushions in idiopathic faecal incontinence[J]. Br J Surg, 2009, 96(6): 680-684.
[20]
叶云奎, 蔡锚, 金纯,等. 吻合器痔核环切术治疗环状混合痔的临床研究[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志, 2015, 35(10): 27-29.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[12] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[13] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[14] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[15] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
阅读次数
全文
36
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 8 0 0 28

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 19 17
  比例 53% 47%

摘要
148
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 148
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 79 69
  比例 53% 47%