切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (05) : 410 -412. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.05.008

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

腹部弧形切口行乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤切除术45例分析
陈海鹏1,(), 徐辉1, 张继涛1, 包和义1, 张双立1, 王敬琪1, 魏树新1, 景慧成1, 鲁明1   
  1. 1. 161000 齐齐哈尔市第一医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-17 出版日期:2016-10-25
  • 通信作者: 陈海鹏
  • 基金资助:
    齐齐哈尔市科学技术计划资助项目(No.SFZD-2014102)

Analysis of 45 cases of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection with abdominal arc incision

Haipeng Chen1,(), Hui Xu1, Jitao Zhang1, Heyi Bao1, Shuangli Zhang1, Jingqi Wang1, Shuxin Wei1, Huicheng Jing1, Ming Lu1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161000, China
  • Received:2016-05-17 Published:2016-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Haipeng Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Haipeng, Email:
引用本文:

陈海鹏, 徐辉, 张继涛, 包和义, 张双立, 王敬琪, 魏树新, 景慧成, 鲁明. 腹部弧形切口行乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤切除术45例分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(05): 410-412.

Haipeng Chen, Hui Xu, Jitao Zhang, Heyi Bao, Shuangli Zhang, Jingqi Wang, Shuxin Wei, Huicheng Jing, Ming Lu. Analysis of 45 cases of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection with abdominal arc incision[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(05): 410-412.

目的

探讨腹部弧形切口行乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤手术治疗中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析齐齐哈尔市第一医院肿瘤外科2014年7月至2016年6月间45例行腹部弧形切口乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤治疗患者的临床资料。

结果

45例患者均行腹部弧形切口并顺利完成手术,无副损伤出现,中位术后镇痛时间1.8天,中位排气时间3.2天,中位淋巴结清扫数14枚,中位切口长度11 cm,手术时间、出血量及并发症、住院时间与以往的传统手术相比并无明显增加。

结论

腹部弧形切口能够有效完成乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤手术,具有手术切口隐蔽、美观、术后疼痛感轻的优点、符合快速康复外科及美容外科的理念,并且手术操作较简单便于基层医院开展,而手术风险及并发症并未增加。因此腹部弧形切口值得在临床中推广应用。

Objective

To explore the value of abdomen arc incision in sigmoid colon and rectum cancer surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of 45 routine abdominal arc incision sigmoid colon and rectum cancer patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University from July 2014 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

45 patients were underwent successfully surgery with abdominal arc incision without side effect. The median postoperative analgesia time was 1.8 days, the median exhaust time was 3.2 days, the median lymph node dissection number was 14, the median incision length was 11 cm. Compared with the previous traditional surgery, the operation time, blood loss, complications and length of hospital stay were not apparent increased.

Conclusions

We can complete the sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery with abdominal arc incision successfully, with artistic hidden incision and less postoperative pain, consistence with the conception of rapid rehabilitation surgery and aesthetic surgery. The operation is relatively simple to facilitate basic hospitals, and does not increase the risks and complications. So the abdomen arc incision is worth popularizing in clinical application.

[1]
Siegel RL,Miller KD,Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016[J]. CA Cancer J Clin , 2016, 66(1): 7-30.
[2]
王锡山,李栗,陈瑛罡, 等. 横切口与直肠癌根治术[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(2): 172-173.
[3]
Heald RJ,Husband EM,Ryall RD.The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery the clue to pelvic recurrence[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(6):613-616.
[4]
Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome[J].Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4): 354-364.
[5]
许剑民,陈竞文. 达芬奇机器人系统在结直肠癌根治术中的应用[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12 (5) : 332-335.
[6]
Kim YM,Baek SE,Lim JS, et al.Clinical application of image-enhanced minimallv invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17 (2) : 304-312.
[7]
王征,周志祥.3D腹腔镜在结直肠癌中的应用优势及局限性[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2015, 30 (3) : 202-204.
[8]
王锡山.关于微创理念与手术入路的断想与思考[J].中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(13): 961-963.
[9]
Hodgson NC,Malthaner RA,Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta- analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2000, 231(3): 436-442.
[10]
Davarse B,Landers D. Physiological advantages of the transverse incision in gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1961, 17: 305-310.
[11]
刘正,王贵玉,陈英罡, 等.改良型下腹部弧形横切口行直肠癌根治术(附112例报告)[J].外科理论与实践杂志, 2012, 17 (5) : 497-498.
[12]
Brown SR,Goodfellow PJ,Adam IJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of transverse skin crease vs. vertical midline incision for right hemicolectomy[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2004, 8(1): 15-18.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[3] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[4] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[5] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[6] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[7] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[8] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[9] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[10] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[11] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[12] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[13] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[14] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要