切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 395 -402. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2026.05.002

指南与共识

结直肠癌手术肠管切割吻合及重建的吻合器应用规范与专家共识(2026版)
中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会   
  • 收稿日期:2026-08-13 出版日期:2026-10-25
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划“诊疗装备与生物医用材料”重点专项(2023YFC2413702)

Expert consensus on application standards of staplers for intestinal transection, anastomosis, and reconstruction in colorectal cancer surgery (2026 Edition)

Colorectal Cancer Committee of the China Anti-Cancer Association   

  • Received:2026-08-13 Published:2026-10-25
引用本文:

中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 结直肠癌手术肠管切割吻合及重建的吻合器应用规范与专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 395-402.

Colorectal Cancer Committee of the China Anti-Cancer Association. Expert consensus on application standards of staplers for intestinal transection, anastomosis, and reconstruction in colorectal cancer surgery (2026 Edition)[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(05): 395-402.

结直肠癌是我国常见的消化道恶性肿瘤之一,外科手术仍是其主要治疗手段。随着腹腔镜及各类新术式的快速发展,吻合器在结直肠手术消化道重建中的应用日益广泛,但对电动智能吻合器选型、钉仓量化匹配、术中多模态质量评估、标准化操作流程等临床亟待明确的问题尚缺乏统一标准。为此,中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会组织国内相关领域专家制定本共识。共识从吻合器应用前全身状况及局部组织评估、肠道切割与吻合操作标准、吻合器选择与使用规范三个维度,系统阐述了结直肠癌手术肠管切割吻合及重建的规范化流程,涵盖围手术期全身状态优化、局部组织血供与张力评估、肿瘤切缘标准、吻合方式选择、术中吻合质量评估、手工加固缝合指征与技术、吻合器型号与钉仓选择原则以及电动吻合器标准化操作技术等核心内容,共形成9条推荐意见。本共识旨在为结直肠手术中吻合器的规范化应用提供循证指导,以期降低吻合口漏、出血、狭窄等术后并发症风险,提高手术安全性。

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant gastrointestinal tumors in China, and surgery remains its primary treatment modality. With the rapid development of laparoscopy and various novel surgical approaches, staplers are being increasingly used in digestive tract reconstruction during colorectal surgery. However, there is still a lack of unified standards for the scientific selection and standardized use of stapling instruments. To address this, the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the China Anti-Cancer Association organized domestic experts in relevant fields to formulate this consensus. The consensus systematically elaborates the standardized procedures for bowel transection, anastomosis, and reconstruction in colorectal cancer surgery from three dimensions: preoperative assessment of systemic conditions and local tissues, standards for bowel transection and anastomosis, and selection and usage specifications for staplers. It covers core contents including optimization of perioperative systemic status, assessment of local tissue blood supply and tension, tumor margin criteria, selection of anastomotic methods, intraoperative quality evaluation of the anastomosis, indications and techniques for hand-sewn reinforcement suturing, principles for selecting stapler types and cartridge sizes, and standardized operating techniques for powered staplers, forming a total of 9 recommendations. This consensus aims to provide evidence-based guidance for the standardized application of staplers in colorectal surgery, so as to reduce the risk of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture, and to improve surgical safety.

表1 证据质量GRADE分级系统
表2 共识推荐分级及专家投票通过情况
[1]
中国抗癌协会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 中国恶性肿瘤整合诊治指南-结肠癌(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(2): 97-113.
[2]
Maurício SF, Xiao J, Prado CM, et al. Different nutritional assessment tools as predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection[J]. Clin Nutr, 2018, 37(5): 1505-1511.
[3]
Sowerbutts AM, Burden S, Sremanakova J, et al. Preoperative nutrition therapy in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2024, 4(4): CD008879.
[4]
Manzanares Campillo MDC, Martín Fernández J, Amo Salas M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral immunonutrition in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: hospital stay and health care costs[J]. Cir Cir, 2017, 85(5): 393-400.
[5]
Cao J, Meltzer R, Cohn E, et al. Friend or foe: the gut microbiota as a modulator of disease trajectory in trauma, surgery, and critical illness[J]. Gut Microbes, 2025, 17(1): 2552346.
[6]
Huisman DE, Reudink M, van Rooijen SJ, et al. LekCheck: a prospective study to identify perioperative modifiable risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 275(1): e189-e197.
[7]
Panayi AC, Knoedler S, Alfertshofer M, et al. The relevance of optimal preoperative glycemic control for outcomes of patients with diabetes undergoing surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2026, 284(1): 194-211.
[8]
Schwenk W, Hoffmann PC. CAVE-A checklist system for preoperative risk evaluation: guideline-conform cardiopulmonary diagnostics before general and visceral surgical interventions[J]. Chirurg, 2017, 88(12): 1046-1056.
[9]
George MD, Baker JF, Winthrop KL, et al. Immunosuppression and the risk of readmission and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing hip fracture, abdominopelvic and cardiac surgery[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020, 79(5): 573-580.
[10]
Koenig-Oberhuber V, Filipovic M. New antiplatelet drugs and new oral anticoagulants[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016, 117(Suppl. 2): ii74-ii84.
[11]
Tang E, Rodriguez RM, Srivastava A, et al. Impact of short duration smoking cessation on post-operative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2025, 106: 111967.
[12]
Wong C, Mohamad Asfia SKB, Myles PS, et al. Smoking and complications after cancer surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2025, 8(3): e250295.
[13]
Simancas-Racines D, Reytor-González C, Frias-Toral E, et al. Weighty matters: Unraveling the impact of obesity on colorectal cancer and nutritional interventions[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2025, 114: 29-40.
[14]
Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Baas PC, et al. Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy for prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomoses[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2010, 12(10): 1018-1025.
[15]
Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, et al. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2013, 148(2): 190-201.
[16]
Healy MA, Peacock O, Hu CY, et al. High rate of positive circumferential resection margin in colon cancer: a national appraisal and call for action[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 276(6): 1023-1028.
[17]
Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 373(9666): 821-828.
[18]
Brauer E, Lippens E, Klein O, et al. Collagen fibrils mechanically contribute to tissue contraction in an in vitro wound healing scenario[J]. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2019, 6(9): 1801780.
[19]
Reddy SH, Gupta V, Yadav TD, et al. Lengthening of left colon after rectal resection: What all is adequate? A prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 31: 27-32.
[20]
Ueno H, Hase K, Shiomi A, et al. Optimal bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: prospective multicentre cohort study with lymph node and feeding artery mapping[J]. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2023, 33: 100680.
[21]
Kinugasa Y, Uehara K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2025, 30(12): 2410-2463.
[22]
Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2015, 314(13): 1346-1355.
[23]
Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 7(11): 991-1004.
[24]
Yan H, Wang PY, Wu YC, et al. Is a distal resection margin of  ≤ 1 cm safe in patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer? a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2022, 26(8): 1791-1803.
[25]
Metwally IH, Zuhdy M, Hamdy O, et al. The impact of narrow and infiltrated distal margin after proctectomy for rectal cancer on patients' outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Indian J Surg Oncol, 2022, 13(4): 750-760.
[26]
中华医学会肿瘤学会结直肠肿瘤学组. 直肠癌外科手术切缘中国专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2024, 27(6): 545-558.
[27]
You YN, Hardiman KM, Bafford A, et al. The American society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2020, 63(9): 1191-1222.
[28]
Mc Entee PD, Singaravelu A, Boland PA, et al. Impact of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on surgeon action and anastomotic leak in colorectal resections. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(3): 1473-1489.
[29]
Maroli A, Paoluzzi Tomada E, Foppa C, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials[J]. Surg Endosc, 2026, 40(3): 1815-1827.
[30]
Numata M, Watanabe J, Tsukada Y, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and surgical results of hand-sewn versus stapled anastomosis for lower rectal cancer located 4-5 cm from the anal verge: a subanalysis of the ultimate study[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2025, 9(6): 1215-1224.
[31]
中华医学会外科学分会. 腹腔镜结直肠外科手术缝合技术与缝合材料选择中国专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(5): 504-511.
[32]
Mathew A, Ramachandra D, Goyal A, et al. Reconstructive techniques following low anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum: meta-analysis[J]. Br J Surg, 2023, 110(3): 313-323.
[33]
Li F, Xie YL, Xu D, et al. Comparison of different anastomosis methods in laparoscopically assisted left hemicolectomy for colon cancer[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2025, 17(11): 111117.
[34]
赵玉沛, 张太平. 消化道重建基本原则与基本技术[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(3): 197-204.
[35]
Kim MH, Kang SI, Cho JR, et al. Objective recovery time with end-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(4): 2499-2506.
[36]
Lin SY, Liang Buan BJ, Sim W, et al. Side-to-side versus end-to-side ileocolic anastomosis in right-sided colectomies: A cohort control study[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2022, 18(3): 408-414.
[37]
Zhang T, Sun Y, Mao W. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2023, 38(1): 147.
[38]
Creavin B, Balasubramanian I, Common M, et al. Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2021, 36(4): 645-656.
[39]
Ferrer-Márquez M, Rubio-Gil F, Torres-Fernández R, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (The IVEA-study)[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2021, 31(4): 408-413.
[40]
Serra-Aracil X, Pascua-Solé M, Sánchez A, et al. Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study (the Hemi-D-TREND study)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2026, 40(2): 1559-1571.
[41]
叶颖江, 高志冬, 祝丽宇. 结直肠癌急性肠梗阻一期切除吻合的共识与争议[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(12): 1283-1287.
[42]
Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Merli C, et al. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2018, 13: 36.
[43]
Kryzauskas M, Bausys A, Jakubauskas M, et al. Intraoperative testing of colorectal anastomosis and the incidence of anastomotic leak: a Meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(47): e23135.
[44]
Lan K, Yang H, Shu SL, et al. Effect of left colonic artery preservation on perfusion at the anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery evaluated with intraoperative ultrasound[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2024, 28(1): 157.
[45]
Yoo RN, Mun JY, Cho HM, et al. Assessment of colorectal anastomosis with intraoperative colonoscopy: its role in reducing anastomotic complications[J]. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(4): 1162.
[46]
Lucarini A, Guida AM, Orville M, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography could reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2024, 26(3): 408-416.
[47]
Mascarenhas M, Mendes F, Fonseca F, et al. A novel deep learning model for predicting colorectal anastomotic leakage: a pioneer multicenter transatlantic study[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(15): 5462.
[48]
Fiorillo C, Tondolo V, Biffoni B, et al. Circular staplers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: Meta-analysis[J]. BJS Open, 2025, 9(2): zrae170.
[49]
Tang B, Lei X, Ai J, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2021, 19(1): 38.
[50]
Yue Y, Zhang X, Qu Y, et al. Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 14: 1337870.
[51]
张毅勋, 关旭, 焦帅, 等. 腔镜切割荷包吻合器在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(2): 148-152.
[52]
Oliveira A, Faria S, Gonçalves N, et al. Surgical approaches to colonic and rectal anastomosis: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2023, 38(1): 52.
[53]
Allen W, Wells CI, Greenslade M, et al. Association between circular stapler diameter and stricture rates following gastrointestinal anastomosis: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(10): 3097-3105.
[54]
Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009, 209(6): 694-701.
[55]
Martín-Arévalo J, Moro-Valdezate D, Pérez-Santiago L, et al. Current evidence on powered versus manual circular staplers in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2025, 40(1): 13.
[56]
Balciscueta Z, Uribe N, Caubet L, et al. Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2020, 24(9): 919-925.
[57]
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 中低位直肠癌手术消化道重建中国专家共识(2026版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2026, 46(6): 697-711.
[58]
Zhou Y, Tan Z, Jiang P, et al. Evaluation of intestinal tissue safety during the compression process of circular end-to-end anastomosis stapler based on finite element simulation[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2025, 13: 1594969.
[59]
Naoi D, Horie H, Sadatomo A, et al. The effect of staple height and rectal-wall thickness on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(4): 1577-1582.
[1] 唐悦, 葛晓明, 邓凯元, 杨剑. 全3D腹腔镜下可切除性胃癌术中非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在消化道重建中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 432-436.
[2] 白瑞璇, 武艺峰, 陈子骞, 刘月胜, 苑宇航, 袁虎方. 袢式吻合与Roux-en-Y吻合对全胃切除术后患者生活质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 437-442.
[3] 周燕, 周春霞, 雷佳玉, 陈晓娟. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术后消化道重建技术与吻合口漏防治策略研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 394-397.
[4] 国产腔镜手术机器人系统的临床应用解决方案研究项目专家组. 单孔机器人肾上腺切除术专家共识[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 491-497.
[5] 陈嘉林, 余绍辉, 李如春, 周太成. 基于倾向得分匹配法研究内脏脂肪面积与结直肠癌术后切口疝的相关性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 379-385.
[6] 中国肺癌防治联盟, 重庆市老年学和老年医学学会. CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检围术期规范化管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 525-533.
[7] 世界华人医师协会妇产科分会. 机器人辅助经阴道自然腔道妇科内镜手术专家共识(2026年版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 193-200.
[8] 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会NOSES技术推广专家委员会, 海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会肿瘤学分会日间手术学组. 结直肠癌日间手术专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 385-394.
[9] 金磊, 印小毛, 李新星, 胡志前. 大肠黏液腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 299-306.
[10] 张若昕, 陆瑶, 刘益磊, 陈国良, 张剑. 盆腔脏器联合切除术中的ERAS与PROMs:从医生视角到患者视角的转变[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 307-314.
[11] 徐正, 杨明, 张岳阳, 周海涛, 关旭, 王锡山. 2024年与2022年中国结直肠癌发病和死亡估计值的描述性比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 315-320.
[12] 高韶华, 徐涛, 宋亮, 雷丽, 王洪伟, 刘宏新. 1994—2023年中国结直肠癌疾病年龄-时期-队列效应及危险因素归因分析——基于GBD 2023研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 321-330.
[13] 林佳仪, 黄颖. Treg细胞在结直肠癌中的作用机制及靶向治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 356-360.
[14] 张玲, 陈慧琳, 贾宁阳. 《血管包裹肿瘤簇在肝细胞癌影像诊疗中的临床应用专家共识(2026年版)》解读[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 289-293.
[15] 陈勇, 彭淼, 裴月红, 黄骁, 张淦, 王文景, 杨琼. 《急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗技术中国专家共识2025》述评:迈向精准化与规范化[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 485-490.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?