切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 209 -216. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2024.03.006

论著

基于术前MRI的盆底解剖参数对超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术时间的影响
吴浩凡1, 刘元豪1, 张锋敏1, 张现中1, 朱金浩1, 黄嘉莹1, 刘忠臣1, 丁良福2,(), 庄成乐1,()   
  1. 1. 200072 上海,同济大学医学院附属第十人民医院胃肠外科
    2. 202157 上海,同济大学医学院附属第十人民医院崇明分院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-14 出版日期:2024-06-25
  • 通信作者: 丁良福, 庄成乐
  • 基金资助:
    上海市崇明区科委科技项目(CKY2021-30); 上海市第十人民医院青年培育项目(YNCR2C014)

The impact of preoperative MRI-based pelvic floor anatomy parameters on the precision functional sphincter-preserving surgery time for ultra-low rectal cancer

Haofan Wu1, Yuanhao Liu1, Fengmin Zhang1, Xianzhong Zhang1, Jinhao Zhu1, Jiaying Huang1, Zhongchen Liu1, Liangfu Ding2,(), Chengle Zhuang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chongming Branch of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 202157, China
  • Received:2024-03-14 Published:2024-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Liangfu Ding, Chengle Zhuang
引用本文:

吴浩凡, 刘元豪, 张锋敏, 张现中, 朱金浩, 黄嘉莹, 刘忠臣, 丁良福, 庄成乐. 基于术前MRI的盆底解剖参数对超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 209-216.

Haofan Wu, Yuanhao Liu, Fengmin Zhang, Xianzhong Zhang, Jinhao Zhu, Jiaying Huang, Zhongchen Liu, Liangfu Ding, Chengle Zhuang. The impact of preoperative MRI-based pelvic floor anatomy parameters on the precision functional sphincter-preserving surgery time for ultra-low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 209-216.

目的

本研究旨在利用术前磁共振成像(MRI),全面评估超低位直肠癌患者的盆底解剖结构,并探究预测超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术(PPS)时间的最佳解剖参数和相应参考值。

方法

对2020年3月至2023年8月进行PPS的患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均于术前行MRI成像(T2加权成像),并进行盆腔解剖参数的测量和计算。采用线性回归分析手术时间的预测因素。根据盆腔解剖参数将患者分为两组,采用Mann-Whitney U检验,比较组间各人群特征差异。

结果

本研究共纳入136例超低位直肠癌患者。盆底肌深度(D)定义为两侧提肛肌与闭孔内肌接触位置连线的中点到两侧肛门直肠交界处连线的最短距离。多因素线性回归分析显示,高血压(标准回归系数=0.155,P=0.045)、淋巴结转移(标准回归系数=0.223,P=0.004)、盆底肌深度(标准回归系数=0.398,P<0.001)是手术时间的独立预测因素。基于Mann-Whitney U检验统计值的分析显示,D=25 mm为最佳诊断截断值。与D<25 mm组的患者相比,D≥25 mm组的患者手术时间更长(240分钟 vs. 210分钟,P=0.005),既往腹部手术史比例更低(17.9% vs. 34.5%;P=0.028),预防性造口比例呈增高趋势(25.6% vs. 13.8%;P=0.091),但差异无统计学意义。除盆底解剖参数D外,两组间其他盆底解剖参数也存在显著差异。D≥25 mm组患者的盆底解剖参数B更短(28 mm vs. 23.5 mm;P=0.001),α、α′、β角度更大(50.4° vs. 55.2°,P<0.001;47.5° vs. 54.8°,P<0.001;48.9° vs. 55°,P<0.001),但A、C等参数差异无统计学意义。

结论

盆底肌深度是评估超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术难度的有效术前预测因子。

Objective

This study aims to comprehensively assess the pelvic floor anatomy of patients undergoing surgery for ultra-low rectal cancer using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the optimal anatomical parameters and corresponding reference values for predicting the surgical time of precision functional sphincter‑preserving surgery (PPS) for ultra-low rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing PPS for ultra-low rectal cancer from March 2020 to August 2023. All patients underwent preoperative MRI imaging (T2-weighted imaging), and pelvic anatomical parameters were measured and calculated. Linear regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors for surgical timing. Patients were divided into two groups based on pelvic anatomical parameters, and differences in demographic characteristics between groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

A total of 136 patients with ultralow rectal cancer were included in this study. Pelvic floor muscle depth (D) was defined as the midpoint between the contact points of the levator ani muscles on both sides and the shortest distance to the line between the anorectal junctions. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that hypertension (standard regression coefficient=0.155, P=0.045), lymph node metastasis (standard regression coefficient=0.223, P=0.004), and pelvic floor muscle depth (standard regression coefficient=0.398, P<0.001) were independent predictive factors for surgical timing. Analysis based on the Mann-Whitney U test statistics showed that D=25 mm was the optimal diagnostic cutoff value. Compared to patients in the D<25 mm group, those in the D≥25 mm group had longer surgery durations (240 minutes vs. 210 minutes, P=0.005), a lower proportion of previous abdominal surgeries (17.9% vs. 34.5%; P=0.028), and a higher, though not statistically significant, trend in the proportion of prophylactic stoma formation (25.6% vs. 13.8%; P=0.091). Apart from pelvic floor depth D, there were significant differences in other pelvic anatomical parameters between the two groups. Patients in the D≥25 mm group had a shorter parameter B (28 mm vs. 23.5 mm, P=0.001) and larger α, α' and β angles (50.4° vs. 55.2°, P<0.001; 47.5° vs. 54.8°, P<0.001; 48.9° vs. 55°, P<0.001), while the differences in parameters A and C were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Pelvic floor muscle depth is an effective preoperative predictor of the difficulty of PPS for ultra-low rectal cancer.

图1 术前MRI评估盆底解剖参数的设计与测量。1A~1C:正中矢状切面,1D~1H:正中冠状切面。1A:标记点a、点b和点c;1B:连接点a和点b的线A;角γ由线A和LAAC(肛管纵轴)组成;1C:标记正中冠状切面的肛管中心;1D:标记点d、点d'、点e、点e';1E:连接点d与点d'之间的线B,点e与点e'之间的线C;1F:标记线B到线C之间的最短距离线D;1G:将线B向两端延长;1H:角α由线B的延长线与点d、点e的连接线组成,α'在另一侧以同样方式组成
表1 盆底肌肉解剖参数及定义
表2 患者基本信息(n=136)[例(%)]
表3 患者盆底解剖参数[med(IQR)]
表4 手术时间影响因素的单因素与多因素线性回归
图2 表示盆底肌深度D和Mann-Whitney U检验统计量之间的关系。该统计量来自定义为D的解剖参数的亚组之间手术时间的比较。将所有患者分为超过和低于特定D值的两组。最高的Mann-Whitney U检验统计量在D=25 mm(P=0.005)时出现
表5 D<25 mm和D≥25 mm患者的临床病理资料对比[例(%)]
图3 盆底肌深度D与其他盆底解剖参数的相关性。参数D与参数α(图3A),参数α’(图3B),参数β(图3C),参数γ(图3D)之间的关系如图所示;r表示皮尔逊相关系数
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2023, 73(1): 17-48.
[2]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2023年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2023, 61(8): 617-644.
[3]
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2022, 20(10): 1139-1167.
[4]
Zhuang CL, Zhang FM, Wang Z, et al. Precision functional sphincter-preserving surgery(PPS) for ultralow rectal cancer: a natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery technique[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(1): 476-485.
[5]
庄成乐, 刘正, 张锋敏, 等. 经自然腔道取标本手术之精准功能保肛术操作要点[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(6): 597-600.
[6]
庄成乐, 张现中, 刘骞, 等. 基于一种螺纹扩肛器的超低位直肠癌精准保肛(PPS)手术[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 8(5): 509-512.
[7]
庄成乐, 刘正, 张锋敏, 等. 基于精准吻合器和刘氏吻合三步法的改良PPS术与传统PPS术治疗超低位直肠癌的非随机病例对照临床研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(1): 30-35.
[8]
Atasoy G, Arslan NC, Elibol FD, et al. Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer[J]. Surg Today, 2018, 48(12): 1040-1051.
[9]
Ferko A, Malý O, Örhalmi J, et al. CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(3): 1164-1171.
[10]
Zhou XC, Su M, Hu KQ, et al. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2016, 11(1): 31-38.
[11]
Lee JM, Han YD, Cho MS, et al. Prediction of transabdominal total mesorectal excision difficulty according to the angle of pelvic floor muscle[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(7): 3043-3050.
[12]
Lirici MM, Hüscher CG. Techniques and technology evolution of rectal cancer surgery: a history of more than a hundred years[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2016, 25(5): 226-233.
[13]
Kang L, Zeng Z, Luo S, et al. Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (TaLaR trial) protocol[J]. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2020, 9(1): 71-76.
[14]
Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(6): 1907-1912.
[15]
Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al. Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15(3): 721-728.
[16]
Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(4): 642-649.
[17]
Yamaoka Y, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, et al. Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(2): 557-566.
[1] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[2] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[3] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[7] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[8] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[9] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[10] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要