切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 599 -604. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.06.006

论著

直肠癌经肛直肠全系膜切除术术后低位前切除综合征的研究
蒋春晖1, 刘晔1, 许春杰1, 周鸿1, 徐庆1, 顾磊1,()   
  1. 1. 200127 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-06 出版日期:2021-12-25
  • 通信作者: 顾磊
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82072671)

Low anterior resection syndrome after transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer

Chunhui Jiang1, Ye Liu1, Chunjie Xu1, Hong Zhou1, Qing Xu1, Lei Gu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Received:2021-04-06 Published:2021-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Lei Gu
引用本文:

蒋春晖, 刘晔, 许春杰, 周鸿, 徐庆, 顾磊. 直肠癌经肛直肠全系膜切除术术后低位前切除综合征的研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 599-604.

Chunhui Jiang, Ye Liu, Chunjie Xu, Hong Zhou, Qing Xu, Lei Gu. Low anterior resection syndrome after transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(06): 599-604.

目的

对比taTME与传统腹腔镜(LapTME)对于术后发生LARS的影响,探究taTME手术入路是否加重LARS的发生。

方法

选取2018年1月~2019年9月期间直肠癌患者,根据手术方式分为taTME组与LapTME组。采集临床参数,围手术期Wexner评分与LARS评分评估肛门功能,术后随访12个月。对比两组间各项参数。

结果

本研究共纳入80例病例,其中LapTME组40例,taTME组40例。术后3个月,两组患者在Wexner评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);taTME组具有更高的LARS得分,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月和12个月时,LARS和Wexner评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的Wexner评分和LARS评分均随时间推移得到明显改善。

结论

taTME可能在术后早期对肛门功能影响更大,而对术后中远期的肛门功能无明显影响。taTME的经肛入路操作不加重LARS的发生。

Objective

To compare the effect of taTME and LapTME on postoperative LARS, and to explore whether transanal approach aggravates the occurrence of LARS.

Methods

The patients with rectal cancer from January 2018 to September 2019 were divided into taTME group and LapTME group according to the operation methods. Clinical parameters were collected, and anal function was evaluated by Wexner score and LARS score during perioperative period. All patients were followed up for twelve months. The parameters between the two groups were compared.

Results

Eighty cases were included, including forty cases in LapTME group and forty cases in taTME group. At three months after operation, there was no significant difference in Wexner score between the two groups (P>0.05). The taTME group had higher LARS score, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in LARS and Wexner scores at six and twelve months after operation (P>0.05). The Wexner score and LARS score of the two groups were significantly improved with time.

Conclusions

taTME may have a greater impact on anal function in the early postoperative period, but no significant effect in anal function in the middle and long term. The transanal approach does not aggravate the occurrence of LARS.

表1 Wexner 评分3
图1 LARS量化评分表4
表2 两组临床病理和手术特征[例(%)]
表3 两组LARS发生情况比较
图2 LARS的治疗方案22
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(1): 7-33.
[2]
Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality[J]. Gut, 2017, 66(4): 683-691.
[3]
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, et al. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996, 39(6): 681-685.
[4]
Emmertsen K,Laurberg S.Low anterior resection syndrome score:development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(5): 922-928.
[5]
Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou LG, et al. International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2020, 63(3): 274-284.
[6]
刘凡, 郭鹏, 申占龙, 等. 低位前切除综合征相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(3): 289-294.
[7]
Croese AD, Lonie JM, Trollope AF, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and systematic review of risk factors[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 56: 234-241.
[8]
López-Sánchez A, Morandeira-Rivas A, Moreno-Sanz C, et al. Long-term anorectal manometry outcomes after laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2021, 31(4): 10.
[9]
Choy KT, Yang TWW, Prabhakaran S, et al. Comparing functional outcomes between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2021, 36(6): 1163-1174.
[10]
Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Witowski J, et al. Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision[J]. BMC Surg, 2019, 19(1): 79.
[11]
Bjoern MX, Perdawood SK. Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2020, 24(3): 231-236.
[12]
Ong GK, Tsai B, Patron RL, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision achieves equivalent oncologic resection compared to laparoscopic approach, but with functional consequences[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 211(13): S0002-9610(20)30736-4.
[13]
Filips A, Haltmeier T, Kohler A, et al. LARS is Associated with lower anastomoses, but not with the transanal approach in patients undergoing rectal cancer resection[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(3): 873-879.
[14]
Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou L, et al. International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2020, 22(3): 331-341.
[15]
Sansoni J, Hawthorne G, Fleming G, et al. The revised faecal incontinence scale: a clinical validation of a new, short measure for assessment and outcomes evaluation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(5): 652-659.
[16]
Maeda K, Yamana T, Takao Y, et al. Japanese practice guidelines for fecal incontinence part 1-definition, epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology and causes, risk factors, clinical evaluations, and symptomatic scores and qol questionnaire for clinical evaluations-English version[J]. J Anus Rectum Colon, 2021, 5(1): 52-66.
[17]
Chen TY, Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. What are the best questionnaires to capture anorectal function after surgery in rectal cancer?[J]. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep, 2015, 11: 37-43.
[18]
Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48(7): 1353-1365.
[19]
Juul T, Battersby NJ, Christensen P, et al. Validation of the English translation of the low anterior resection syndrome score[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2015, 17(10): 908-916.
[20]
Dulskas A, Smolskas E, Kildusiene I, et al. Treatment possibilities for low anterior resection syndrome: a review of the literature[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2018, 33(3): 251-260.
[21]
Eftaiha SM, Balachandran B, Marecik SJ, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation can be an effective treatment for low anterior resection syndrome[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(10): 927-933.
[22]
Martellucci J. Low anterior resection syndrome: a treatment algorithm[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2016, 59(1): 79-82.
[23]
Kalkdijk-Dijkstra AJ, van der Heijden JAG, van Westreenen HL, et al. Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)[J]. Trials, 2020, 21(1): 112.
[24]
Christensen P, Fearnhead NS, Martellucci J. Transanal irrigation: another hope for patients with LARS[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2020, 24(12): 1231-1232.
[25]
Rosen HR, Boedecker C, Fürst A, et al. "Prophylactic" transanal irrigation (TAI) to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal resection: results at 12-month follow-up of a controlled randomized multicenter trial[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2020, 24(12): 1247-1253.
[26]
Jimenez-Gomez LM, Espin-Basany E, Marti-Gallostra M, et al. Low anterior resection syndrome: a survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC), and the Spanish Society of Coloproctology (AECP)[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016, 31(4): 813-823.
[27]
Madbouly KM, Hussein AM. Temporary sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence owing to rectal hyposensitivity: a prospective, double-blind study[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(1): 56-63.
[28]
Enomoto H, Nishizawa Y, Inamori K, et al. Sacral neuromodulation for the prevention of a permanent stoma in patients with severe defecation disorder following intersphincteric resection[J]. Surg Today, 2021: 10.1007/s00595-021-02233-5.
[29]
Sarcher T, Dupont B, Alves A, et al. Anterior resection syndrome: What should we tell practitioners and patients in 2018?[J]. J Visc Surg, 2018, 155(5): 383-391.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要