切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (06) : 557 -561. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

符合Amsterdam标准的结肠肿瘤患者异时结直肠肿瘤发病风险研究
周欣1, 杨柳1, 张晓梅2, 李东正1, 朱明2, 周建农1, 陈森清2,()   
  1. 1. 210009 南京医科大学附属江苏省肿瘤医院普外科
    2. 210009 南京,江苏省肿瘤防治研究所遗传与分子生物学研究室
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-21 出版日期:2018-12-25
  • 通信作者: 陈森清
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省医学重点人才项目(No.RC2011092)

Risk of metachronous colorectal carcinoma and adenoma after colectomy for colon neoplasma in patients from families meeting the Amsterdam Criteria

Xin Zhou1, Liu Yang1, Xiaomei Zhang2, Dongzheng Li1, Ming Zhu2, Jiannong Zhou1, Senqing Chen2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Affiliated Jiangsu Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
    2. Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Jiangsu Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2017-12-21 Published:2018-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Senqing Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Senqing, Email:
引用本文:

周欣, 杨柳, 张晓梅, 李东正, 朱明, 周建农, 陈森清. 符合Amsterdam标准的结肠肿瘤患者异时结直肠肿瘤发病风险研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(06): 557-561.

Xin Zhou, Liu Yang, Xiaomei Zhang, Dongzheng Li, Ming Zhu, Jiannong Zhou, Senqing Chen. Risk of metachronous colorectal carcinoma and adenoma after colectomy for colon neoplasma in patients from families meeting the Amsterdam Criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(06): 557-561.

目的

探讨符合Amsterdam标准的结肠肿瘤患者术后异时结直肠癌及高危腺瘤的发病风险及对生存的影响。

方法

回顾分析南京医科大学附属江苏省肿瘤医院收治的34例符合Amsterdam标准的结肠肿瘤患者术后生存与异时结直肠肿瘤发病的随访资料。

结果

6例患者接受了结肠全切除治疗,中位随访122个月,无异时结直肠肿瘤发生。28例患者接受了结肠部分切除治疗,中位随访82个月,10例发生了异时结直肠癌,1例发生了需要手术切除的异时结肠腺瘤。结肠部分切除组5年和10年累计异时结直肠肿瘤发病风险分别为24.1%和48.2%,与结肠全切除组相比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.047)。全组总体5年和10年生存率分别为100%和85.6%。结肠部分切除组与结肠全切除组总体生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.306)。发生异时结直肠肿瘤的患者与没有发生异时结直肠肿瘤的患者相比,总体生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.901)。结肠部分切除后患者性别、年龄、既往结直肠癌手术史、肿瘤部位、分化程度和分期与异时结直肠肿瘤的发病风险均无显著相关关系。

结论

符合Amsterdam标准的结肠肿瘤患者术后发生异时结直肠肿瘤的风险相当高,与结肠部分切除相比,结肠全切除治疗有助于预防异时结直肠肿瘤,但不能显著改善总体生存率。

Objective

To investigate the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer and high risk colorectal adenoma after colectomy for colon neoplasma and its impact on survival in a cohort of patients of families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria.

Methods

Thirty-four patients of families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria who underwent colectomy in the Affiliated Jiangsu Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University for colon neoplasm was identified from a single-institution hereditary colorectal cancer database. The demographics, clinicopathological characteristics of the index CRC, and the follow-up data about survival and metachronous colorectal neoplasma were analyzed.

Results

No metachronous colorectal neoplasm occurred in six patients who underwent total or subtotal colectomy during a median follow-up of 122 months. Of twenty-eight patients who underwent segmental colectomy, ten developed metachronous colorectal cancer, and one adenoma that need abdominal resection during a median follow-up of eighty-two months. The cumulative risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasma was 24.1% at 5 years and 48.2% at 10 years in segmental colectomy patients, which was significantly different than that in total colectomy patients (P=0.047). The overall cumulative survival was 100% at 5 years and 85.6% at 10 years. No significant difference in overall survival was observed between segmental colectomy and total colectomy (P=0.306), or between metachronous colorectal neoplasma positive and free patients (P=0.901). Patient gender, age, past history of colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer, tumor site, differentiation or stage were not risk factors for metachronous colorectal neoplasma after segmental colectomy.

Conclusions

Patients of families meeting Amsterdam criteria carry a high risk of metachronous colorectal carcinoma and high risk adenoma. Total colectomy, compared with segmental colectomy, can reduce metachronous colorectal tumor risk, however dose not significantly improve overall survival.

表1 发生异时结直肠肿瘤患者的临床病理特征
表2 结肠肿瘤临床病理特征与异时结直肠肿瘤发病风险的Cox回归分析结果
[1]
Herzig DO, Buie WD, Weiser MR, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of patients with lynch syndrome [J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(2): 137-143.
[2]
李晓芬, 袁瑛, 张苏展. 中国人遗传性大肠癌综合征的特征及诊疗规范[J].中国癌症杂志, 2015, 25(11): 841-848.
[3]
Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Khan PM, et al. The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC) [J].Dis Colon Rectum, 1991, 34(5): 424-425.
[4]
Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, et al. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC [J].Gastroenterology, 1999, 116(6): 1453-1456.
[5]
Lindor NM, Rabe K, Petersen GM, et al. Lower cancer incidence in Amsterdam-I criteria families without mismatch repair deficiency: familial colorectal cancer type X [J]. JAMA,2005,293(16):1979-1985.
[6]
Kalady MF, McGannon E, Vogel JD, et al. Risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma after colectomy for colorectal cancer in patients meeting amsterdam criteria [J].Ann Surg, 2010, 252(3):507-511.
[7]
张渊智, 张志芳, 张帆, 等. 中国人遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌常见临床表型特征与肠外肿瘤谱分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2011, 20(6): 513-518.
[8]
刘善润, 王振军, 赵博, 等. 遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者的临床特点及hMSH2与hMLH1种系突变的筛查[J].中华医学杂志, 2004, 84(9): 714-717.
[9]
蔡三军, 蔡崎, 孙孟红, 等. 遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家系及临床病理特征分析[J].中华消化杂志, 2004, 24(2): 90-93.
[10]
Cirillo L, Urso ED, Parrinello G, et al. High risk of rectal cancer and of metachronous colorectal cancer in probands of families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria [J].Ann Surg, 2013, 257(5): 900-904.
[11]
You YN, Chua HK, Nelson H, et al. Segmental vs. extended colectomy: measurable differences in morbidity, function, and quality of life [J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(7): 1036-1043.
[12]
Haanstra JF, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Gopie JP, et al. Quality of life after surgery for colon cancer in patients with lynch syndrome: partialversus subtotal colectomy [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012, 55(6): 653-659.
[1] 陈永胜, 朱健, 王军, 张永辉, 徐源佑, 丁璐璐, 陈建国, 樊健, 姚海蓉. 江苏省启东市育龄女性恶性肿瘤患者生存率变化趋势分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 363-372.
[2] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[6] 郑民华, 马君俊. 不断推进中国腹腔镜直肠癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 473-476.
[7] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[8] 徐伯麒, 陶亮, 章帆, 毛忠琦. 结肠癌患者淋巴结转移预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 393-397.
[9] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[10] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[11] 唐新, 刁德昌, 廖伟林, 林佳鑫, 汪佳豪, 李文娟, 谢嘉欣, 敖琳, 李洪明, 易小江, 卢新泉, 冯晓创. 保留神经的鞘外游离技术在腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中的近远期疗效分析:基于倾向性评分匹配的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 372-380.
[12] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
[13] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[14] 周启阳, 何宋兵, 胡优, 陈昕, 周雨迪, 周晓俊. 第四代达芬奇机器人单孔加一腹腔镜全结肠切除术治疗慢传输型便秘一例(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 348-352.
[15] 周斌, 刘新献. 术前TACE对提高儿童肝母细胞瘤长期生存率的影响[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 314-317.
阅读次数
全文


摘要