切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 52 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.01.10

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线
刘东宁1, 唐城1, 江群广1, 李太原1,()   
  1. 1. 330006 江西,南昌大学第一附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2016-02-25
  • 通信作者: 李太原
  • 基金资助:
    国家青年科学基金(81402401); 江西省自然科学基金(20142BAB215042)

Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma

Dongning Liu1, Cheng Tang1, Qunguang Jiang1, Taiyuan Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2016-01-26 Published:2016-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Taiyuan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Taiyuan, Email:
引用本文:

刘东宁, 唐城, 江群广, 李太原. 机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(01): 52-55.

Dongning Liu, Cheng Tang, Qunguang Jiang, Taiyuan Li. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(01): 52-55.

目的

评估机器人结直肠癌根治术不同阶段的手术效果,探讨机器人结直肠癌根治术学习曲线问题。

方法

分析2014年12月至2015年8月由同一组医师完成的75例腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术,按手术先后次序分3组(A、B、C),每组25例,比较各组机器人安装时间、手术时间、出血量、肛门排气时间、术后住院天数、术后并发症和3站淋巴结清扫数目及其总数的差异。

结果

A组机器人安装时间(38±5)min,显著长于B组(22±4)min和C组(21±2)min(P均<0.05);A组手术时间(201±39)min,显著长于B组(160±42)min和C组(156±43)min(P均<0.05);A组出血量(142±35)ml,显著多于B组(105±28)ml和C组(102±28)ml(P均<0.05)。3组肛门排气时间、术后住院天数、术后并发症和3站淋巴结清扫数目及其总数无显著性差异(P>0.05)。A组手术25例在4个月内完成,平均每月6.3台手术,B组和C组均在2个月内完成,平均每月12.5台手术。

结论

有丰富腹腔镜结直肠癌手术经验的外科医师行机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线大约为25例,手术频度为平均每月6.3例。

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical colorectal resection and to define the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical colorectal resections.

Methods

Clinical data of 75 cases underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer were reviewed form December 2014 to August 2015.The patients were divided into 3 groups (groups A, B and C) by operative sequence.The robotic set-up time, operating time, bleeding volume, postoperative aerofluxus time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, number of removed lymphatic nodes were compared among the 3 groups.

Results

The robotic set-up time in group A was significantly longer than that in group B and C [ (38 ± 5) min vs. (22 ± 4) min, P<0.05; (38±5) min vs. (21±2) min, P<0. 05 ], and there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P>0.05). The operating time in group A was (201±39) min, significantly longer than that in group B (160±42) min and group C (156±43) min (P<0.05), but the operating time did not vary significantly between group B and C (P>0.05). The bleeding volume was significantly greater in group A than in group B and C (142±35, 105±28, and 102±28ml, respectively, P<0.05), but showed no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). No significant difference was found in post operative aerofluxus time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, number of removed lymphatic nodes among the 3 groups (P>0. 05). The 25 patients in group A received the operation within a time period of 4 months (6.3 cases per month), and groups B and C were done in 2 months (12.5 cases per month).

Conclusions

The surgeons with abundant experiences of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery can learn the surgical skills after performing 25 robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resections for colorectal neoplasms, the operation frequency was an average of 6.3 cases per month.

表1 各组病人临床资料表
表2 各组手术效果比较表
表3 各站各组淋巴结清扫数目比较表
[1]
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(12): 1689-1694.
[2]
Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(7): 792-797.
[3]
刘凤涛,江志伟,赵坤,等.达芬奇机器人系统在直肠癌根治术中的应用(附70例报告).腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,17 (9): 677-679.
[4]
兰远志,曾冬竹,张超,等.达芬奇机器人直肠癌根治术的学习曲线.中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6): 490-493.
[5]
Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg, 1995, 170(1): 55-59.
[6]
Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, et al. Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(3): 829-840.
[7]
Mak TW, Lee JF, Futaba K, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2014, 6(6): 184-193.
[8]
胡跃, 张苏展. 结直肠癌诊治指南热点解读. 中国实用外科杂志, 2011, 31(6): 473-475.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[4] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[5] 江东根, 依力夏提·艾力, 依布拉音江·阿布力克木, 依力盼·依拉木, 冯瑶, 艾尼玩·木拉克, 艾克拜尔江·阿里木. 基层医院单一术者改良单通道腹腔镜下鞘状突环扎术学习曲线及体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 560-565.
[6] 庞名扬, 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱清毅. 运用国产单孔机器人完成经膀胱入路膀胱部分切除术治疗膀胱癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-643.
[7] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[8] 罗迎吉星, 隗瑞丽, 王天晓, 黄笳, 徐力, 孙永亮, 杨志英. 开放、腔镜、机器人辅助肝血管瘤剥除术治疗巨大肝血管瘤对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 277-283.
[9] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[10] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[11] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[12] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[13] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
阅读次数
全文


摘要