切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 52 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.01.10

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线
刘东宁1, 唐城1, 江群广1, 李太原1,()   
  1. 1. 330006 江西,南昌大学第一附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2016-02-25
  • 通信作者: 李太原
  • 基金资助:
    国家青年科学基金(81402401); 江西省自然科学基金(20142BAB215042)

Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma

Dongning Liu1, Cheng Tang1, Qunguang Jiang1, Taiyuan Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2016-01-26 Published:2016-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Taiyuan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Taiyuan, Email:
引用本文:

刘东宁, 唐城, 江群广, 李太原. 机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(01): 52-55.

Dongning Liu, Cheng Tang, Qunguang Jiang, Taiyuan Li. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(01): 52-55.

目的

评估机器人结直肠癌根治术不同阶段的手术效果,探讨机器人结直肠癌根治术学习曲线问题。

方法

分析2014年12月至2015年8月由同一组医师完成的75例腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术,按手术先后次序分3组(A、B、C),每组25例,比较各组机器人安装时间、手术时间、出血量、肛门排气时间、术后住院天数、术后并发症和3站淋巴结清扫数目及其总数的差异。

结果

A组机器人安装时间(38±5)min,显著长于B组(22±4)min和C组(21±2)min(P均<0.05);A组手术时间(201±39)min,显著长于B组(160±42)min和C组(156±43)min(P均<0.05);A组出血量(142±35)ml,显著多于B组(105±28)ml和C组(102±28)ml(P均<0.05)。3组肛门排气时间、术后住院天数、术后并发症和3站淋巴结清扫数目及其总数无显著性差异(P>0.05)。A组手术25例在4个月内完成,平均每月6.3台手术,B组和C组均在2个月内完成,平均每月12.5台手术。

结论

有丰富腹腔镜结直肠癌手术经验的外科医师行机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线大约为25例,手术频度为平均每月6.3例。

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical colorectal resection and to define the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical colorectal resections.

Methods

Clinical data of 75 cases underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer were reviewed form December 2014 to August 2015.The patients were divided into 3 groups (groups A, B and C) by operative sequence.The robotic set-up time, operating time, bleeding volume, postoperative aerofluxus time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, number of removed lymphatic nodes were compared among the 3 groups.

Results

The robotic set-up time in group A was significantly longer than that in group B and C [ (38 ± 5) min vs. (22 ± 4) min, P<0.05; (38±5) min vs. (21±2) min, P<0. 05 ], and there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P>0.05). The operating time in group A was (201±39) min, significantly longer than that in group B (160±42) min and group C (156±43) min (P<0.05), but the operating time did not vary significantly between group B and C (P>0.05). The bleeding volume was significantly greater in group A than in group B and C (142±35, 105±28, and 102±28ml, respectively, P<0.05), but showed no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). No significant difference was found in post operative aerofluxus time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, number of removed lymphatic nodes among the 3 groups (P>0. 05). The 25 patients in group A received the operation within a time period of 4 months (6.3 cases per month), and groups B and C were done in 2 months (12.5 cases per month).

Conclusions

The surgeons with abundant experiences of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery can learn the surgical skills after performing 25 robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resections for colorectal neoplasms, the operation frequency was an average of 6.3 cases per month.

表1 各组病人临床资料表
表2 各组手术效果比较表
表3 各站各组淋巴结清扫数目比较表
[1]
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(12): 1689-1694.
[2]
Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(7): 792-797.
[3]
刘凤涛,江志伟,赵坤,等.达芬奇机器人系统在直肠癌根治术中的应用(附70例报告).腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,17 (9): 677-679.
[4]
兰远志,曾冬竹,张超,等.达芬奇机器人直肠癌根治术的学习曲线.中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6): 490-493.
[5]
Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg, 1995, 170(1): 55-59.
[6]
Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, et al. Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(3): 829-840.
[7]
Mak TW, Lee JF, Futaba K, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2014, 6(6): 184-193.
[8]
胡跃, 张苏展. 结直肠癌诊治指南热点解读. 中国实用外科杂志, 2011, 31(6): 473-475.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[3] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[4] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[5] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[6] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[9] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[10] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[11] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[12] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[13] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[14] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[15] 孙昕, 程海波, 沈卫星. 基于全转录组学探讨仙连解毒方治疗Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的疗效机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要