切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 462 -469. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.05.003

论著

经自然腔道取标本手术在3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术中的近期疗效分析
杨飖1, 周主青1, 鲁兵1, 朱哲1, 江期鑫1, 纪昉1, 傅传刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200120 上海,同济大学附属东方医院胃肠肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2021-10-25
  • 通信作者: 傅传刚
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委员会面上项目(81773275)

Analysis of the short-term clinical efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer

Yao Yang1, Zhuqing Zhou1, Bing Lu1, Zhe Zhu1, Qixing Jiang1, Fang Ji1, Chuan'gang Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Published:2021-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Chuan'gang Fu
引用本文:

杨飖, 周主青, 鲁兵, 朱哲, 江期鑫, 纪昉, 傅传刚. 经自然腔道取标本手术在3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术中的近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 462-469.

Yao Yang, Zhuqing Zhou, Bing Lu, Zhe Zhu, Qixing Jiang, Fang Ji, Chuan'gang Fu. Analysis of the short-term clinical efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(05): 462-469.

目的

探讨经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)在3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术中的安全性、有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月期间同济大学附属上海东方医院胃肠肛肠外科接受3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术患者80例的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为两组:术中经自然腔道取标本手术组(NOSES组)34例;传统腹腔镜腹部辅助切口手术组(传统组)46例,两组均行预防性末端回肠造口术,比较两组的手术安全性及近期疗效。

结果

两组资料在年龄、性别、身体质量指数、肿瘤直径、肿瘤部位、肿瘤分期比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);NOSES组与传统组相比在术中出血量(t=0.192,P=0.848)、手术时间(t=1.527,P=0.131)、术后并发症发生率(χ2=1.368,P=0.850)、术后首次排气时间(t=1.126,P=0.263)、术后进食流质时间(t=0.863,P=0.391)、术后病理学检查(χ2=0.224,P=0.894)结果差异均无统计学意义。两组在术后住院时间对比,NOSES组明显低于对照组[(9.97±2.58)天 vs.(12.28±3.80)天,t=3.064;P=0.003],差异有统计学意义。对比术后第1至3天切口疼痛程度,NOSES组术后疼痛VAS评分明显低于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(术后1天:t=3.586,P=0.001;术后2天:t=2.942,P=0.004;术后3天:t=2.792,P=0.007)。根据WIS评分,在随访时间超过1年的64例患者中,49例(76.6%)患者术后肛门功能良好(WIS评分≤10分),无严重肛门失禁患者。

结论

两组手术方式均为符合肿瘤根治性原则的有效手术,手术效果相当。经自然腔道取标本3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术在减轻术后切口疼痛、缩短术后住院时间方面具有优势,是安全可行的手术方式。

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological features of 80 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer during January 2018 to December 2020 in Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery Department of Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University. All patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: thirty-four cases were divided into the NOSES group who underwent natural orifice specimen extraction surgery of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection. Fourty-six cases were divided into traditional group who underwent traditional approach of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection. A comparative, retrospective analysis was performed between the two groups in operative safety index and efficacy.

Results

Age, gender, body mass index, tumor location, diameter of tumor, tumor stage were not significantly different between the two groups(P>0.05); As compared to the traditional group, there were no significant difference between two groups in terms of blood loss(t=0.192, P=0.848), operation time(t=1.527, P=0.131), postoperative complications(χ2=1.368, P=0.850), first anal exhaust time(t=1.126, P=0.263), postoperative eating liquid time(t=0.863, P=0.391) and postoperative pathology features(χ2=0.224, P=0.894). NOSES group was associated with significantly less estimated mean postoperative hospitalization time [(9.97±2.58) days vs.(12.28±3.80) days, t=3.064; P=0.003]. The VAS score of the incision pain of the first to third day after operation in group NOSES was significantly lower than that in traditional group (postoperative 1d: t=3.586, P=0.001; postoperative 2d: t=2.942, P=0.004; postoperative 3d: t=2.792, P=0.007). According to WIS criteria, there were 76.6% patients whose anal sphincter function was good (WIS≤10), and there was no patient with serious anal incontinence.

Conclusion

By using both two surgical methods, radical resection of tumors could be achieved effectively in accordance with the principles of TME, and the operative effect was comparable. NOSES of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer has advantages in less estimated postoperative incision pain and postoperative hospitalization time, it is a safe and reliable treatment.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
图1 经肛门取出标本的腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术操作步骤。1A:纱线条结扎肿瘤远端肠管;1B:肿瘤远端肠管切开后碘伏纱条消毒;1C:经主操作Trocar置入塑料保护套建立无菌通道;1D:经无菌通道置入管型吻合器抵钉座;1E:切割闭合器离断近端肠管;1F:将切除的标本置入保护套;1G:经肛门拖出标本和保护套;1H:圈套器将肠壁环形固定于抵钉座中心杆上;1I:以管型吻合器行直肠结肠端端吻合
表2 两组患者术中及术后评价指标比较
表3 两组患者术后病理学检查结果比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者术后VAS评分
表5 两组患者术后Wexner失禁评分
[1]
郑民华, 马君俊. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术的评价[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2012, 19(6): 583-585.
[2]
邓文宏, 郑勇斌, 童仕伦, 等. 基于神经层面指引的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术功能保护效果分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(12): 1144-1151.
[3]
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, et al. An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of "natural orifice specimen extraction" (N.O.S.E)[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(7): 1120-1124.
[4]
何金杰, 丁克峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的质量控制[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(8): 759-762.
[5]
李杰, 李禹呈, 郑阳春, 等. 腹腔镜下结直肠癌体内切除标本经直肠拖出手术(NOSES)的无菌和无瘤操作技巧[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018,11 (6):360-363.
[6]
Wolthuis AM, Van Geluwe B, Fieuws S, et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction: a systematic review[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(10): 1183-1188.
[7]
傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 等. 中高位直肠癌和乙状结肠癌腹腔镜经直肠标本取出手术的保护措施[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1151-1155.
[8]
杜涛, 傅传刚. 经自然腔道标本取出的腹腔镜结直肠切除术[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2019, 40(6): 767-773.
[9]
中国NOSES联盟, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOSES专委会. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术专家共识(2019版)[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 8(4): 336-342.
[10]
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10): 613-616.
[11]
池畔. 腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术技巧[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2010, 13 (6): 397-399.
[12]
Bousquet PJ, Combescure C, Klossek JM, et al. Change in visual analog scale score in a pragmatic randomized cluster trial of allergic rhinitis[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009, 123(6): 1349-1354.
[13]
Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54(8): 963-968.
[14]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
[15]
Franklin MEJr, Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2013, 17 (Suppl 1): S63-67.
[16]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 28, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[17]
韩俊毅, 傅传刚, 周主青, 等. 经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(4): 326-331.
[18]
彭健, 丁成明, 贾泽民, 等. NOSES结直肠癌根治术后腹腔冲洗液肿瘤细胞学检测及细菌培养结果分析[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(4): 342-346.
[19]
杨烈, 罗金龙, 周总光. 经肛拖出式腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术(附视频)[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(2): 198-200.
[20]
Franklin MEJr, Liang S, Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 127-132.
[21]
Saurabh B, Chang SC, Ke TW, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction with single stapling colorectal anastomosis for laparoscopic anterior resection: feasibility, outcomes, and technical considerations[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(1): 43-50.
[22]
Park JS, Choi GS, Kim HJ, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2011, 98(5): 710-715.
[23]
王锡山.中国NOSES面临的挑战与展望[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(1): 2-7.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[8] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[9] 张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.
[10] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[11] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES Ⅳ式)中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
[12] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[13] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[14] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[15] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要