切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 462 -469. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.05.003

论著

经自然腔道取标本手术在3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术中的近期疗效分析
杨飖1, 周主青1, 鲁兵1, 朱哲1, 江期鑫1, 纪昉1, 傅传刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200120 上海,同济大学附属东方医院胃肠肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2021-10-25
  • 通信作者: 傅传刚
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委员会面上项目(81773275)

Analysis of the short-term clinical efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer

Yao Yang1, Zhuqing Zhou1, Bing Lu1, Zhe Zhu1, Qixing Jiang1, Fang Ji1, Chuan'gang Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Published:2021-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Chuan'gang Fu
引用本文:

杨飖, 周主青, 鲁兵, 朱哲, 江期鑫, 纪昉, 傅传刚. 经自然腔道取标本手术在3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术中的近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 462-469.

Yao Yang, Zhuqing Zhou, Bing Lu, Zhe Zhu, Qixing Jiang, Fang Ji, Chuan'gang Fu. Analysis of the short-term clinical efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(05): 462-469.

目的

探讨经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)在3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术中的安全性、有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月期间同济大学附属上海东方医院胃肠肛肠外科接受3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术患者80例的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为两组:术中经自然腔道取标本手术组(NOSES组)34例;传统腹腔镜腹部辅助切口手术组(传统组)46例,两组均行预防性末端回肠造口术,比较两组的手术安全性及近期疗效。

结果

两组资料在年龄、性别、身体质量指数、肿瘤直径、肿瘤部位、肿瘤分期比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);NOSES组与传统组相比在术中出血量(t=0.192,P=0.848)、手术时间(t=1.527,P=0.131)、术后并发症发生率(χ2=1.368,P=0.850)、术后首次排气时间(t=1.126,P=0.263)、术后进食流质时间(t=0.863,P=0.391)、术后病理学检查(χ2=0.224,P=0.894)结果差异均无统计学意义。两组在术后住院时间对比,NOSES组明显低于对照组[(9.97±2.58)天 vs.(12.28±3.80)天,t=3.064;P=0.003],差异有统计学意义。对比术后第1至3天切口疼痛程度,NOSES组术后疼痛VAS评分明显低于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(术后1天:t=3.586,P=0.001;术后2天:t=2.942,P=0.004;术后3天:t=2.792,P=0.007)。根据WIS评分,在随访时间超过1年的64例患者中,49例(76.6%)患者术后肛门功能良好(WIS评分≤10分),无严重肛门失禁患者。

结论

两组手术方式均为符合肿瘤根治性原则的有效手术,手术效果相当。经自然腔道取标本3D腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术在减轻术后切口疼痛、缩短术后住院时间方面具有优势,是安全可行的手术方式。

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological features of 80 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer during January 2018 to December 2020 in Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery Department of Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University. All patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: thirty-four cases were divided into the NOSES group who underwent natural orifice specimen extraction surgery of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection. Fourty-six cases were divided into traditional group who underwent traditional approach of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection. A comparative, retrospective analysis was performed between the two groups in operative safety index and efficacy.

Results

Age, gender, body mass index, tumor location, diameter of tumor, tumor stage were not significantly different between the two groups(P>0.05); As compared to the traditional group, there were no significant difference between two groups in terms of blood loss(t=0.192, P=0.848), operation time(t=1.527, P=0.131), postoperative complications(χ2=1.368, P=0.850), first anal exhaust time(t=1.126, P=0.263), postoperative eating liquid time(t=0.863, P=0.391) and postoperative pathology features(χ2=0.224, P=0.894). NOSES group was associated with significantly less estimated mean postoperative hospitalization time [(9.97±2.58) days vs.(12.28±3.80) days, t=3.064; P=0.003]. The VAS score of the incision pain of the first to third day after operation in group NOSES was significantly lower than that in traditional group (postoperative 1d: t=3.586, P=0.001; postoperative 2d: t=2.942, P=0.004; postoperative 3d: t=2.792, P=0.007). According to WIS criteria, there were 76.6% patients whose anal sphincter function was good (WIS≤10), and there was no patient with serious anal incontinence.

Conclusion

By using both two surgical methods, radical resection of tumors could be achieved effectively in accordance with the principles of TME, and the operative effect was comparable. NOSES of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer has advantages in less estimated postoperative incision pain and postoperative hospitalization time, it is a safe and reliable treatment.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
图1 经肛门取出标本的腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术操作步骤。1A:纱线条结扎肿瘤远端肠管;1B:肿瘤远端肠管切开后碘伏纱条消毒;1C:经主操作Trocar置入塑料保护套建立无菌通道;1D:经无菌通道置入管型吻合器抵钉座;1E:切割闭合器离断近端肠管;1F:将切除的标本置入保护套;1G:经肛门拖出标本和保护套;1H:圈套器将肠壁环形固定于抵钉座中心杆上;1I:以管型吻合器行直肠结肠端端吻合
表2 两组患者术中及术后评价指标比较
表3 两组患者术后病理学检查结果比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者术后VAS评分
表5 两组患者术后Wexner失禁评分
[1]
郑民华, 马君俊. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌保肛手术的评价[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2012, 19(6): 583-585.
[2]
邓文宏, 郑勇斌, 童仕伦, 等. 基于神经层面指引的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术功能保护效果分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(12): 1144-1151.
[3]
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, et al. An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of "natural orifice specimen extraction" (N.O.S.E)[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(7): 1120-1124.
[4]
何金杰, 丁克峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的质量控制[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(8): 759-762.
[5]
李杰, 李禹呈, 郑阳春, 等. 腹腔镜下结直肠癌体内切除标本经直肠拖出手术(NOSES)的无菌和无瘤操作技巧[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018,11 (6):360-363.
[6]
Wolthuis AM, Van Geluwe B, Fieuws S, et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction: a systematic review[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(10): 1183-1188.
[7]
傅传刚, 周主青, 韩俊毅, 等. 中高位直肠癌和乙状结肠癌腹腔镜经直肠标本取出手术的保护措施[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1151-1155.
[8]
杜涛, 傅传刚. 经自然腔道标本取出的腹腔镜结直肠切除术[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2019, 40(6): 767-773.
[9]
中国NOSES联盟, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOSES专委会. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术专家共识(2019版)[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 8(4): 336-342.
[10]
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10): 613-616.
[11]
池畔. 腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术技巧[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2010, 13 (6): 397-399.
[12]
Bousquet PJ, Combescure C, Klossek JM, et al. Change in visual analog scale score in a pragmatic randomized cluster trial of allergic rhinitis[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009, 123(6): 1349-1354.
[13]
Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54(8): 963-968.
[14]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
[15]
Franklin MEJr, Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2013, 17 (Suppl 1): S63-67.
[16]
Hisada M, Katsumata K, Ishizaki T, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 28, 20(44): 16707-16713.
[17]
韩俊毅, 傅传刚, 周主青, 等. 经直肠标本取出式3D腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除术远切端两种处理方式对比研究[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(4): 326-331.
[18]
彭健, 丁成明, 贾泽民, 等. NOSES结直肠癌根治术后腹腔冲洗液肿瘤细胞学检测及细菌培养结果分析[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(4): 342-346.
[19]
杨烈, 罗金龙, 周总光. 经肛拖出式腹腔镜直肠癌超低位前切除术(附视频)[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(2): 198-200.
[20]
Franklin MEJr, Liang S, Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 127-132.
[21]
Saurabh B, Chang SC, Ke TW, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction with single stapling colorectal anastomosis for laparoscopic anterior resection: feasibility, outcomes, and technical considerations[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(1): 43-50.
[22]
Park JS, Choi GS, Kim HJ, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2011, 98(5): 710-715.
[23]
王锡山.中国NOSES面临的挑战与展望[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(1): 2-7.
[1] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[2] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[3] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[7] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[8] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[9] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[10] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[11] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[12] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[13] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[14] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[15] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
阅读次数
全文


摘要