切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 144 -148. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

测量骶骨岬至直肠残端的距离在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术精准吻合中的应用价值
郑波波1, 屈亚琦1, 张松1, 岳育民1, 厍豪1, 汪光柱1, 董胜璞1, 邱健1,(), 王小强1   
  1. 1. 710068 西安,陕西省人民医院普外一科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-16 出版日期:2021-04-25
  • 通信作者: 邱健
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划(2021SF-128)

The application value of measuring the distance between the sacral promontory to the rectal stump in accurate anastomosis of laparoscopic radical rectal cancer resection

Bobo Zheng1, Yaqi Qu1, Song Zhang1, Yumin Yue1, Hao She1, Guangzhu Wang1, Shengpu Dong1, Jian Qiu1,(), Xiaoqiang Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shannxi Province People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, China
  • Received:2020-11-16 Published:2021-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Jian Qiu
引用本文:

郑波波, 屈亚琦, 张松, 岳育民, 厍豪, 汪光柱, 董胜璞, 邱健, 王小强. 测量骶骨岬至直肠残端的距离在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术精准吻合中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 144-148.

Bobo Zheng, Yaqi Qu, Song Zhang, Yumin Yue, Hao She, Guangzhu Wang, Shengpu Dong, Jian Qiu, Xiaoqiang Wang. The application value of measuring the distance between the sacral promontory to the rectal stump in accurate anastomosis of laparoscopic radical rectal cancer resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(02): 144-148.

目的

评估术中精确测量直肠残端至骶骨岬的距离(Drp)在腹腔镜直肠癌手术精准吻合中的应用价值。

方法

纳入陕西省人民医院普外科2019年1月1日到2020年10月1日连续入院的并接受择期腹腔镜手术的中低位直肠癌病例39例,收集临床病例资料并回顾手术视频;术中测量步骤如下:使用线段测量Drp;拉展左半结肠及其系膜至骶骨岬水平,使用钛夹标记相应结肠为A点;以A点为起点,以原Drp线段测量A点以远Drp+3 cm处为直肠癌近端切除线。行结直肠端端吻合,经肛留置肛管行肠腔内减压,新辅助放化疗术后病例行末段回肠造口,评价指标包括术中,术后及标本质量三方面;本研究采用描述性统计方法。

结果

手术时间(247±57)min,估计术中出血量(35±15)mL。吻合前游离脾区结肠7例;吻合后盆腔结肠无“悬空架桥”的病例;无吻合后游离近端结肠及再次裁剪系膜的病例;远切缘距肿瘤下缘的距离(2.3±1.1)cm,Drp(17.7±4.6)cm,近切端距肿瘤上缘的距离(16.4±3.2)cm,直肠全系膜切除的标本质量均为A级,直肠癌远近切缘无阳性病例;术后无B、C级吻合口漏发生,吻合口出血1例;肛管排气时间(3.1±1.2)天,排便时间(3.4±1.6)天,术后住院时间(9.1±2.3)天。

结论

测量Drp能够精确地确定拟吻合结肠的长度,促进腹腔镜根治性直肠癌切除术的精准吻合。

Objective

To evaluate the value of intraoperative accurate measurement of the distance from the distal rectal edge to the promontory of the sacrum(Drp) in accurate anastomosis of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with low-middle rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery who were admitted to General Surgery Department of Shannxi Provincial People's Hospital from January 1, 2019 to October 1, 2020 were included. Clinical data were collected and surgical videos were reviewed. Intraoperative measurement was performed as follows: Line segment was used to measure the Drp; The left semicolon and its mesangium were stretched at the level of the promonium of the sacrum and A titanium clip was used to mark the corresponding colon as point A; Starting from point A, the original Drp line segment was used to measure the proximal resection line of rectal cancer from point A to Drp+3 cm. Colorectal end-to-end anastomosis was performed, and enteral decompression was performed through anal indwelling anal canal. Patients underwent terminal ileostomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The evaluation indexes include intraoperative, postoperative and specimen quality. Descriptive statistical methods were used in this study.

Results

The operative time was (247±57)min, and the intraoperative blood loss was estimated at (35±15)mL. The splenic flexure of the colon was mobilized before anastomosis in 7 cases. There were no cases of pelvic colon "bridging" after anastomosis, and the pelvic colon was relaxed after anastomosis through the anterior sacral area. There were no cases of free proximal colon after anastomosis and the mesangium was trimmed again. The Drp (17.7±4.6) cm, the distance from the proximal resection margin was (16.4±3.2) cm, and the distance from the distal resection margin was (2.3±1.1) cm. The specimen quality of total rectal mesorectal resection was grade A. There were no positive cases at the distal resection margin of rectal cancer. There was no anastomotic leakage after surgery. One patient had anastomotic bleeding. Exhaust time was (3.1±1.2) d, defecation time was (3.4±1.6) d, and postoperative hospitalization time was (9.1±2.3) d.

Conclusion

Measuring the Drp can accurately determine the proximal colon length and promote accurate anastomosis in laparoscopic radical rectal resection.

图1 术中测量示意图
图2 术中测量详细步骤。2A:将线段一端与直肠远切断对齐;2B:将线段松弛地展开于骶前,于骶骨岬水平切断线段备用测量;2C:将左半结肠拉展后平骶骨岬水平标记为A点,再测量A点以远备用线段长度;2D:左半结肠测量线段长度后额外增加3 cm作为近切缘
图3 术后标本及测量骶骨岬到直肠远切缘的线段
1
陶凯雄, 高金波. 直肠癌术后吻合口漏发生的危险因素[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(4): 384-387.
2
Yang X, Zheng E, Ye L, et al. The effect of pericolic lymph nodes metastasis beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor on patients with rectal cancer[J]. BMC cancer, 2020, 20(1): 573.
3
Fiori E, Crocetti D, Lamazza A, et al. Defecatory dysfunction after colon cancer resection: the role of inferior mesenteric artery tie[J]. Anticancer research, 2020, 40(5): 2969-2974.
4
Liu D, Luo R, Wan Z, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 12848.
5
Chin YH, Decruz GM, Ng CH, et al. Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression[J]. Techniques in coloproctology, 2021, 25(1): 35-48.
6
Guan X, Lu Z, Wang S, et al. Comparative short- and long-term outcomes of three techniques of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for rectal cancer[J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology: the Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 46(10 Pt B): e55-e61.
7
Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery[J]. The British Journal of Surgery, 2001, 88(9): 1157-1168.
8
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, 20(7): 1729-1734.
9
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组. 中国直肠癌手术吻合口漏诊断、预防及处理专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2019, 22(3): 201-206.
10
Shiwakoti E, Song J, Li J, et al. Prediction model for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection[J]. The Journal of International Medical Research, 2020, 48(9): 300060520957547.
11
汪建平. 重视中低位直肠癌外科治疗质量控制体系的推广应用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(9): 799-801.
12
王杉, 申占龙, 姜可伟, 等. 直肠癌TME和ELAPE手术质量控制[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 5(6): 463-467.
13
叶颖江, 申占龙, 王杉. 直肠癌手术质量控制[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(1): 25-27.
14
de Lacy FB, Roodbeen SX, Ríos J, et al. Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 677.
15
Zheng B, Zhang X, Wang X, et al. A comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic total mesorectal excision: trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis[J]. Colorectal Disease: the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020, 22(4): 382-391.
16
Wang S, Liu J, Wang S, et al.Adverse effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and survival after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2017, 41(1): 277-284.
17
den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery[J]. The British Journal of Surgery, 2009, 96(9): 1066-1075.
18
Song M, Liu J, Xia D, et al. Assessment of intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Techniques in coloproctology, 2020.
19
Shibuya N, Matsuda T, Yamashita K, et al. Clinical significance of intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomotic assessment in rectal cancer surgery[J]. Anticancer research, 2019, 39(10): 5761-5765.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[4] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[5] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[6] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[7] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[10] 白浪, 张雪玉, 白铁成, 贺爱军. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中圆锥形重叠吻合成形术对Siewert Ⅱ型AEG患者胃食管反流、营养状态的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
[11] 栗粟, 王义刚, 汪俊州, 等. 达芬奇机器人辅助胰头肿瘤局部切除+胰腺端端吻合术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 360-362.
[12] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[13] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[14] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[15] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
阅读次数
全文


摘要