切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (05) : 444 -446. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.05.015

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

经验交流

机器人结直肠癌根治术的初步应用体会
王首寒1, 王斌1, 陈佳祺1, 孙小单2,()   
  1. 1. 130012 长春,吉林省肿瘤医院腹部肿瘤外三科
    2. 吉林省肿瘤医院妇瘤二科
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-19 出版日期:2016-10-25
  • 通信作者: 孙小单

Early experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma

Shouhan Wang1, Bin Wang1, Jiaqi Chen1, Xiaodan Sun2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Abdominal Oncology, Jilin Province Tumor Hospital, Changchun, 130012, China
    2. Department Gynecologic Oncology, Jilin Province Tumor Hospital, Changchun, 130012, China
  • Received:2016-05-19 Published:2016-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodan Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Xiaodan, Email:
引用本文:

王首寒, 王斌, 陈佳祺, 孙小单. 机器人结直肠癌根治术的初步应用体会[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(05): 444-446.

Shouhan Wang, Bin Wang, Jiaqi Chen, Xiaodan Sun. Early experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(05): 444-446.

目的

探讨达芬奇机器人手术系统应用于结直肠癌手术的初步体会。

方法

回顾性收集吉林省肿瘤医院腹部肿瘤科2014年10月至2016年5月的63例结直肠癌行机器人手术患者临床数据,进行整理分析。

结果

63例手术均顺利完成,无一例中转开腹,无术后并发症,机器人安装时间为(15.24±5.69)min,手术时间为(176.43±59.39)min,术中出血量(28.65±22.36)mL,清扫淋巴结数(14.47±5.67)枚,术后排气时间(51.43±12.96)h,术后住院日(8.22±1.52)d。

结论

达芬奇机器人手术系统应用于结直肠癌的手术治疗安全可行,手术效果好,术后恢复快,适合临床应用。

Objective

To investigate early experience of Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma.

Methods

The clinical outcomes of 63 colorectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection from October 2014 to May 2016 were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

All operations were completed successfully. There were no conversions to open surgery and no postoperative mortality. The robot docking time was (15.24±5.69) min. The operative time was (176.43±59.39) min. The blood loss was (28.65±22.36) ml. The number of lymph nodes harvested was (14.47±5.67). The recover time of bowel function was(51.43±12.96) hours. The postoperative hospital stay was (8.22±1.52) days.

Conclusions

Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal carcinoma is safe and feasible. The robotic system is suitable for clinical application.

[1]
Xiao-Hui DU,Shen D,Rong LI, et al. Robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer: technique and early outcome[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2013, 126(1): 51-54.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2008版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2009, 12(3): 310-312.
[3]
Weber PA. Telerobotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Right and Sigmoid Colectomies for Benign Disease[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2002, 45(12): 1695-1696.
[4]
Baek JH,Mckenzie S,Garcia-Aguilar J, et al. Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2010, 251(5): 882-886.
[5]
Biffi R,Luca F,Bianchi PP, et al. Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: current status and perspectives[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, 22(2): 546-556.
[6]
Alimoglu O,Atak I,Orhun K, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Minerva Chirurgica, 2013, 68(5): 471-478.
[7]
Park S,Kim N K. The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 2015, 30(7): 837-846.
[8]
Amato A,Pescatori M. Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, 6(1): 117-118.
[9]
Morelli L,Guadagni S,Franco G D, et al. Use of the new Da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: technical considerations and early experience[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30(9): 1281-1283.
[10]
Jin C K,Chang S Y,Lim S B, et al. Comparative analysis focusing on surgical and early oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopy-assisted, and robot-assisted approaches in rectal cancer patients[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31(6): 1-9.
[11]
刘东宁,唐城,江群广, 等. 机器人结直肠癌根治术的学习曲线[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 5(1): 52-55.
[12]
中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科医师委员会. 机器人结直肠癌手术专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 14(12): 891-897.
[13]
兰远志,曾冬竹,张超, 等. 达芬奇机器人直肠癌根治术的学习曲线[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2014, 14(06): 490-493.
[14]
Bertani E,Chiappa A,Ubiali P, et al. Robotic colectomy: is it necessary?[J]. Minerva Chirurgica, 2013, 68(5): 445-456.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[3] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[4] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[5] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[6] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[9] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[10] 王晓燕, 肖佑, 肖戈, 王真权. 老年结直肠癌肺转移CT特征及高危因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-509.
[11] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[12] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[13] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[14] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要