切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 238 -243. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.03.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜尾侧入路右半结肠癌根治性切除的安全性、可行性及临床应用价值
邹瞭南1,(), 李洪明1, 万进1   
  1. 1. 510512 广东省中医院 广州中医药大学第二附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-21 出版日期:2016-06-25
  • 通信作者: 邹瞭南
  • 基金资助:
    广东省省级科技计划项目(No.2015A030401082); 广东省科技厅自筹经费项目粤科规财字((2015)110号)

The safety, feasibility and clinical application of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using a caudal-to-cranial approach

Liaonan Zou1,(), Hongming Li1, Jin Wan1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510512, China
  • Received:2016-03-21 Published:2016-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Liaonan Zou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zou Liaonan, Email:
引用本文:

邹瞭南, 李洪明, 万进. 腹腔镜尾侧入路右半结肠癌根治性切除的安全性、可行性及临床应用价值[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 238-243.

Liaonan Zou, Hongming Li, Jin Wan. The safety, feasibility and clinical application of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using a caudal-to-cranial approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 238-243.

目的

探讨尾侧入路法腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性切除术的安全性、可行性及临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2015年12月广东省中医院胃肠外科右半结肠癌病例90例,接受尾侧入路法腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性切除术。

结果

90例患者均完成手术,无死亡。手术总体并发症11.1%,其中1例(1.1%)患者因术中助手暴力撕裂回结肠静脉汇入SMV处出血,经开腹小切口修补血管后继续在腹腔镜下成功完成手术。术后并发症发生率为10%,其中包括3例(3.3%)肺部感染、2例(2.2%)泌尿系感染、1例(1.1%)切口感染、2例(2.2%)炎性肠梗阻和1例(1.1%)淋巴瘘,均经保守治疗后痊愈出院。手术时间为146.8±30.5 min,术中失血量为68.4±37.9 ml,首次排气时间为49.7±21.5 h,恢复流质饮食时间为58.1±13.2 h,术后住院时间为7.8±3.2 d,平均淋巴结清扫数目为29.8±9.9枚,其中淋巴结阳性数目为4.1±2.1枚。

结论

尾侧入路法腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性切除术是安全、可行的,符合肿瘤学根治原则,在缩短外科医生腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的学习曲线和保障手术安全方面会提供有益的帮助。

Objective

To investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using a caudal-to-cranial approach.

Methods

From January 2014 to December 2015, 90 cases with curable right-side colon cancer underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using a caudal-to-cranial approach. The general clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

All 90 cases underwent laparoscopic surgery successfully. The overall complication rate was 11.1%. One patient (1.1%) had intraoperative ileocolic artery bleeding due to violent retraction and was then successfully managed through a small incision. The total postoperative complication rate was 11.1%, three cases (3.3%) with pulmonary infection, two (2.2%) urinary system infection, one (1.1%) wound infection, two (2.2%) inflammatory bowel obstruction and one (1.1%) lymph fistula, all treated conservatively with no reoperation. The mean blood loss was 68.4±37.9 ml, mean operative time 146.8±30.5 min , time of first flatus 49.7±21.5 hours , liquid diet 58.1±13.2 hours. The postoperative hospital stay was 7.8±3.2 day. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 29.8±9.9, and the mean positive lymph nodes was 4.1±2.1.

Conclusions

The caudal-to-cranial approach is safe and feasible for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy; it meets the principle of surgical oncology and may be helpful to shorten the learning curve of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

表1 基线资料表
图1 肠系膜上静(动)脉后方、胰头十二指肠前方的游离
图2 肠系膜上静(动)脉及其右侧属支的解剖与相应淋巴结的清扫。a图为切开后腹膜,由尾则向头侧解剖肠系膜上静脉(SMV);b图为与后方Toldt′s间隙相贯通,沿肠系膜上静脉(SMV)右侧清扫回结肠动静脉(ICV/ICA)根部淋巴结;c图为彻底清扫肠系膜上静脉(SMV)右侧及后方淋巴脂肪结缔组织;d图为系膜完整的升结肠癌手术标本
表2 术中及术后结果总结表
[1]
Jacobs M, Verdeja J C, Goldstein H S. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(3):144-150.
[2]
Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group tria l [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246(4):655-662, 662-664.
[3]
严俊,应敏刚,周东, 等. 腹腔镜右半结肠切除中间入路与侧方人路的前瞻性随机对照研究. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2010, 13(6):403-405.
[4]
Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, et al. Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(8):e447-e469.
[5]
Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome [J]. Ann Surg, 2002, 236(6):759-766, 767.
[6]
Liang J T, Huang K C, Lai H S, et al. Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14(1):109-117.
[7]
Jayne D G, Guillou P J, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(21):3061-3068.
[8]
Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472):1718-1726.
[9]
邹瞭南,熊文俊,李洪明, 等. 尾侧入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术疗效分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(11):1124-1127.
[10]
Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson G A, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery [J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(6):830-840.
[11]
Stucky C C, Pockaj B A, Novotny P J, et al. Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146) [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(9):2422-2431.
[12]
李勇,吴德庆,王俊江. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的难点和技巧[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2014(8):768-771.
[13]
郑民华,马君俊. 腹腔镜右半结肠完整结肠系膜切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015, (1):1-4.
[14]
郑波波,王楠,吴涛, 等. 改良中间入路与传统中间入路在腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中的比较研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, (8):812-816.
[15]
于海涛,李国新,张策, 等. 腹腔镜中间入路法右半结肠切除术解剖学观察[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2008, 26(5):477-480.
[16]
李国新,丁自海,张策, 等. 腹腔镜下左半结肠切除术相关筋膜平面的解剖观察[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2006, 24(3):298-301.
[17]
Okazaki T, Hasegawa S, Urushihara N, et al. Toldt′s fascia flap: a new technique for repairing large diaphragmatic hernias [J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2005, 21(1):64-67.
[18]
Decanini C, Milsom JW, Bohm B, et al. Laparoscopic oncologic abdominoperineal resection [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1994, 37(6):552-558.
[19]
Milsom JW, Bohm B, Decanini C, et al. Laparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model [J]. Surg Endosc, 1994, 8(9):1117-1123.
[20]
Sakaguchi T., Shohachi Suzuki, Yoshifumi Morita, et al. Analysis of anatomic variants of mesenteric veins by 3-dimensional portography using multidetector-rowcomputed tomography [J]. The American Journal of Surgery, 2010, 200(1):15-22.
[21]
Hyoung Jung Kim, Young Tae Ko, Joo Won Lim, et al.Radiologic anatomy of the superior mesenteric vein and branching patterns of the Wrst jejunal trunk: evaluation using multi-detector row CT venography [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2007, 29(1):67-75.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[5] 薛永婷, 高峰, 王雅楠, 屈莲平. 溶瘤病毒治疗在结直肠癌中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 380-384.
[6] 武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[7] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[9] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[10] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[11] 王晓燕, 肖佑, 肖戈, 王真权. 老年结直肠癌肺转移CT特征及高危因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-509.
[12] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[13] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[14] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[15] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
阅读次数
全文


摘要