切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 179 -180. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.02.14

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

经验交流

右半结肠癌全结肠系膜切除术47例分析
张恒春1,(), 于伟光1, 姜晓明2, 范东1   
  1. 1. 157011 牡丹江医学院红旗医院普外一科
    2. 牡丹江医学院红旗医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-14 出版日期:2016-04-25
  • 通信作者: 张恒春
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省卫生厅课题(2010268)

Analysis of the 47 cases of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer

Hengchun Zhang1,(), Weiguang Yu1, Xiaoming Jiang2, Dong Fan1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital, Mudanjiang Medical College. Mudanjiang 157011, China
    2. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hongqi Hospital, Mudanjiang Medical College. Mudanjiang 157011, China
  • Received:2016-02-14 Published:2016-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Hengchun Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hengchun, Email:
引用本文:

张恒春, 于伟光, 姜晓明, 范东. 右半结肠癌全结肠系膜切除术47例分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(02): 179-180.

Hengchun Zhang, Weiguang Yu, Xiaoming Jiang, Dong Fan. Analysis of the 47 cases of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(02): 179-180.

目的

探讨右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除(complete mesocolic excision,CME)在临床手术治疗中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析我科2012年7月至2014年9月间手术治疗的47例右半结肠癌行CME治疗患者的临床资料。

结果

47例均行CME,手术顺利,无副损伤出现,中位淋巴结清扫数为18枚,Ⅲ期病人系膜根部淋巴结阳性率为25.53%(12/47),手术时间、出血量及并发症与我院以往的传统手术相比并无明显增加。

结论

CME能够使右半结肠癌根治更合理化,系膜和淋巴结切除的更彻底,尤其是系膜根部的淋巴结清扫的更彻底,使Ⅲ期病人获益更大,而手术风险及并发症并无增加。因此,CME值得在临床中推广。

Objective

To investigate the therapeutic effect of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer.

Methods

The data of 47 cases of right colon cancer performed elective CME by the same group of surgeons between July 2012 and September 2014 at Mudanjiang University Hongqi Hospital General Surgery Department were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Among the 47 cases with CME. The operation smoothly and no vice injury. The median number of total lymph nodes retrieved was 18. Twelve (25.53%) cases of stage III had the positive lymph nodes in or over mesenteric root. The operation time, the volume of intraoperative blood and the overall postoperative complication rates compared to traditional surgery without apparent increase.

Conclusions

By complete mesocolic excision, the integrated radical resection for right colon cancer could be more successfully. The mesentery and lymphoid tissue could be eliminated maximally, especially lymph nodes in mesenteric root. The complete mesocolic excision could be more benefit of stage III patient and without more surgical risk and complication. Therefore, the CME is worth popularization in clinical.

[1]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4): 354-364.
[2]
叶颖江,申战龙,王杉.结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术的实践与技术.中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2012,6(2): 120-125.
[3]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4): 354-364; discussion 364-365.
[4]
West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(2): 272-278.
[5]
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(6): 613-616.
[6]
Pramateftakis MG. Optimizing colonic cancer surgery: high ligation and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy. Tech Coloproctol, 2010, 14 Suppl 1: S49-51.
[7]
叶颖江,高志冬,王杉,等.完整结肠系膜切除术在结肠癌手术治疗中的应用.中国实用外科杂志,2011,31(6): 494-496.
[8]
Eiholm S, Ovesen H. Total mesocolic excision versus traditional resection in right-sided colon cancer-method and increased lymph node harvest. Dan Med Bull, 2010, 57(12): 4224.
[1] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[2] 王玲燕, 邹磊, 洪亮, 宋三兵, 付润, 熊胜男, 宋晓春. 心脏外科术后患者并发低三碘甲状腺原氨酸综合征的影响因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 399-402.
[3] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[4] 张浩, 张万福, 韩飞, 佟琳, 王运帷, 李少辉, 陈阳, 曹鹏, 官浩. 游离组织瓣治疗无吻合血管或需困难吻合血管创面的临床进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 442-446.
[5] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[6] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[7] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[8] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[9] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[10] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[11] 唐新, 刁德昌, 廖伟林, 林佳鑫, 汪佳豪, 李文娟, 谢嘉欣, 敖琳, 李洪明, 易小江, 卢新泉, 冯晓创. 保留神经的鞘外游离技术在腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中的近远期疗效分析:基于倾向性评分匹配的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 372-380.
[12] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
[13] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[14] 李晓东, 魏云. 冠状切口额下入路治疗前颅窝巨大脑膜瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 318-319.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要