切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 33 -39. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.01.07

所属专题: 文献

论著

经肛门微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的可行性分析
徐永鹏1, 王锡山2,()   
  1. 1. 150086 哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科
    2. 100021 北京,中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-16 出版日期:2016-02-25
  • 通信作者: 王锡山
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81272706)

The feasibility analysis of tranasnal minimally invasive surgical treatment for rectal cancer

Yongpeng Xu1, Xishan Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urinary Surgery, The Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
    2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2015-01-16 Published:2016-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Xishan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xishan, Email:
引用本文:

徐永鹏, 王锡山. 经肛门微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的可行性分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(01): 33-39.

Yongpeng Xu, Xishan Wang. The feasibility analysis of tranasnal minimally invasive surgical treatment for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(01): 33-39.

目的

评价经肛门微创手术(transanal minimally invasive surgery,TAMIS)临床疗效,以期为患者提供更好的手术方式选择。

方法

回顾性分析2012年7月至2014年9月间在哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院结直肠肿瘤外科接受直肠肿物局部切除术患者52例,其中TAMIS组30例,传统经肛门切除组(TAE)22例,对患者进行系统随访,并详细记录其临床资料。

结果

TAMIS组手术患者平均手术时间41.5(25~90)分钟。平均住院时间3(1~4)天。SILS Port平均安装时间3(1~5)分钟,TAE组手术患者平均手术时间55(25~110)分钟。平均住院时间3(1~4)天。52例患者手术均获得完整切除,未见切缘阳性患者。共发生术后短期内肛门括约肌功能异常1例,术后尿潴留1例,术后肛门出血1例。两组患者肿物距离肛缘距离方面差异有显著的统计学意义,TAMIS术能够获得更为广泛的手术范围;TAMIS组手术时间更短(41.5分钟,P<0.05);在肛门功能影响方面,TAMIS组患者便失禁严重程度评分下降明显(P=0.002),肛门功能恢复良好;患者术后疼痛强度评分低于TAE手术组(P=0.001),经过数学分析得到TAMIS曲线公式为Y=-13.15ln(x)+79.563。根据手术时间二次求导曲线图,第12例为拐点,提示前12例为学习阶段。

结论

经肛门微创可通过常规腹腔镜器械完成,手术学习曲线平滑,易于掌握,肛门功能损伤小,术后疼痛轻微,手术范围广,术野清晰,在直肠良性肿物或早期直肠癌的局部切除中具有良好的疗效。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical curative effect of the transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS), is aiming to provide a better surgical procedure for patients.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 52 cases of patients with colorectal neoplasm local resection from July 2012 to September 2014 in the department of colorectal surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. 30 cases were TAMIS group, 22 cases were TAE group. All the patients were followed up, and recorded detail clinical data.

Results

In TAMIS group, the average operation time was 41.5 minutes (25~90), the average length of hospital stay was 3 days (1~4), and setup time of SILS Port was 3 minutes on average (1~5). The average operation time of TAE group was 55 minutes (25~110), and the average length of hospital stay was 3 days (1~4). 52 cases were obtained complete resection, with no positive cut edge. Of all the patients, 1 case was with anal sphincter dysfunction, 1 case was with urinary retention shortly after the postoperation, 1 case was with postoperative anal bleeding. The difference of distance from neoplasm to anal edge was of statistical significance in two groups of patients, TAMIS technique can get wider operation range, and TAMIS group has shorter operation time (41.5 minutes, P<0.05); In terms of anal function, the score of fecal incontinence in TAMIS group was significantly decreased (P=0.002), anal function recovered well; The intensity score of postoperative pain was lower than TAE group (P=0.001), TAMIS curve formula was Y=-13.15 ln (x)+ 79.563 after mathematical analysis. According to operation time, the 12th case was inflection point in the second derivative curve, indicating the previous 12 cases were the learning phase.

Conclusions

Transanal minimally invasive surgery can be finished by conventional laparoscopic instruments, the learning curve is smooth, and easy to master, with smaller anus function damage, mild postoperative pain, wide scope of operation and clear operation field, which was of good curative effect in the treatment of benign neoplasm or local excision of early rectal cancer.

表1 TAMIS组与TAE组患者的临床资料表
图1 TAMIS学习曲线对数函数模型
图2 TAMIS学习曲线二次求导曲线
图3 患者FISI评分
图4 TAMIS患者FISI评分变化
图5 TAE患者FISI评分
[1]
Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Baig M, et al. Use of transanal minimally invasive surgery for endoscopic resection of rectal tumour: a technical note. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2015, 3(3): 266-267.
[2]
Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J, et al. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(11): 1047-1053.
[3]
Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(5): 473-480.
[4]
Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, et al. TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) with SILSTM port versus Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM): a comparative experimental study. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(10): 3762-3768.
[5]
Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(3): 301-307.
[6]
Silveira Mendes CR, Miranda Ferreira LS, Aguiar Sapucaia R, et al. Transanal minimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS): technique and results from an initial experience. J Coloproctol, 2013, 33(4): 191-195.
[7]
Hakiman H, Pendola M, Fleshman JW. Replacing Transanal Excision with Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and/or Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Rectal Cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2015, 28(1): 38-42.
[8]
McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benig and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg, 2014, 208(3): 372-381.
[9]
Atallah S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2014, 23(1): 10-16.
[10]
Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24(9): 2200-2205.
[11]
Slack T, Wong S, Muhlmann M. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: an initial experience. ANZ J Surg, 2014, 84 (3): 177-180.
[12]
Corman′s Textbook of Colorectal Surgery (2012) 6th Edition. Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery: Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery. Chapter 19: 594-595.
[13]
Hayashi S, Takayama T, Yamagata M,et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery used to perform transanal endoscopic microsurgery (SILSTEM) for T1 rectal cancer under spinal anesthesia: report of a case. Surg Today. 2013 Mar; 43(3): 325-328.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[8] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[9] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[10] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[11] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[12] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[13] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
[14] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[15] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
阅读次数
全文


摘要