切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 132 -138. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2023.02.007

论著

高分辨弥散加权成像ADC直方图参数与直肠癌临床特征相关性的回顾性研究
王欣1, 孙丹琦1, 黄瑾瑜1,()   
  1. 1. 215000 苏州大学附属第一医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-24 出版日期:2023-04-25
  • 通信作者: 黄瑾瑜
  • 基金资助:
    苏州市“科教兴卫”青年科技项目(KJXW2020010); 江苏省苏州市民生科技项目(SYS201734)

Correlation of ADC histogram parameters from high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging with clinical characteristics in rectal cancer: a retrospective study

Xin Wang1, Danqi Sun1, Jinyu Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow Uniiversity, Suzhou 215000, China
  • Received:2022-08-24 Published:2023-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Jinyu Huang
引用本文:

王欣, 孙丹琦, 黄瑾瑜. 高分辨弥散加权成像ADC直方图参数与直肠癌临床特征相关性的回顾性研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 132-138.

Xin Wang, Danqi Sun, Jinyu Huang. Correlation of ADC histogram parameters from high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging with clinical characteristics in rectal cancer: a retrospective study[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(02): 132-138.

目的

为了阐明高分辨弥散加权成像ADC的直方图参数与直肠癌临床特征的相关性。

方法

回顾性分析研究46例直肠癌患者术前高分辨弥散加权图像以及术后病理样本。采用开源软件MaZda对所有受试者的高分辨ADC图像进行特征提取,并进行直方图分析,根据肿瘤分级、T/N分期、血浆癌胚抗原(CEA)水平对患者进行分组,评估各临床特征与ADC直方图参数之间的相关性。

结果

经病理证实的直肠癌患者,Spearman相关性分析显示,T分期越低的肿瘤,ADC直方图参数的Perc 1%越低(r=0.358,P=0.015)。ADC直方图参数在肿瘤分化程度、N分期及血浆CEA水平间差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

术前ADC直方图参数Perc 1%和肿瘤T分期之间存在显著正相关性。由高分辨弥散加权图像获得的ADC直方图参数可用于评估直肠癌的病理分期。

Objective

To elucidate the possible associations between ADC histogram parameters obtained using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI; RESOLVE) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and several clinical features in rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

This retrospective study was performed by screening RESOLVE DWI and postoperative pathological samples of 46 patients with rectal cancer. ADC histogram analysis was performed on the RESOLVE ADC maps. The patients were grouped according to cancer grade,TN stage,and the plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. The correlations between each clinical feature and ADC histogram parameters were evaluated using open source software MaZda.

Results

A total of 46 patients with pathologically confirmed RC were enrolled. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that tumors with a lower T stage corresponded to lower Perc 1% values (r=0.358, P=0.015). Nevertheless,there were no significant differences in ADC parameters between tumor differentiation grade,N stage,and plasma CEA level (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Our study revealed a significant correlation between the tumor T stage and preoperative Perc 1% ADC parameters alluding to a potential relationship between different pathologically confirmed T stages and histogram results. These findings suggest that ADC parameters derived from RESOLVE images may be used to assess the biological behaviors of RC.

图1 纳入与排除病例流程图
图2 RESOLVE ADC图中提取直方图特征的热图
表1 ADC直方图参数及组内观察者一致性分析
图3 同一例RC患者的高分辨率和传统DW图像和ADC图。3A:高分辨DW图像;3B:高分辨ADC图像;3C:传统DW图像;3D:传统ADC图像。肿瘤的ADC值分别为0.89(3A,3B)和0.96(3C,3D)
图4 通过rs-EPI获得肿瘤不同T分期的ADC图。4A:T1期直肠癌;4B:T2期直肠癌;4C:T3期直肠癌;4D:T4期直肠癌。4A~4D肿瘤ADC值分别为0.75、0.85、0.73和0.69
图5 通过rs-EPI获得不同分化等级肿瘤的ADC图及相应的HE染色组织病理学图像。5A~5C的ADC值分别为0.55、0.73和0.89
图6 ADC直方图参数与直肠癌临床病理特征的相关性分析。*P<0.05(双检验),差异有统计学意义;**P<0.01(双重检验),差异有统计学意义
图7 通过rs-EPI获得低/高血浆CEA水平肿瘤相应ADC图。7A:血浆CEA低水平肿瘤;7B:血浆CEA高水平肿瘤。7A~7B的ADC值分别为0.89和0.96
[1]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
[2]
刘恩瑞, 关旭, 魏然, 等. 新辅助治疗反应对局部进展期直肠癌患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(1): 44-53.
[3]
Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 35(6): 1365-1371.
[4]
Kim DJ, Kim JH, Lim JS, et al. Restaging of rectal cancer with MR imaging after concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy[J]. Radiographics, 2010, 30(2): 503-516.
[5]
Schurink NW, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH. Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives[J]. Br J Radiol, 2019, 92(1096): 20180655.
[6]
Yang L, Qiu M, Xia C, et al. Value of high-resolution DWI in combination with texture analysis for the evaluation of tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2019, 212(6): 1279-1286.
[7]
Porter DA, Heidemann RM. High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2009, 62(2): 468-475.
[8]
Xu XQ, Liu J, Hu H, et al. Improve the image quality of orbital 3 T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging[J]. Clin Imaging, 2016, 40(4): 793-796.
[9]
Sun K, Chai W, Fu C, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging-guided MR spectroscopy in breast lesions using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(6): 1565-1574.
[10]
Tokoro H, Fujinaga Y, Ohya A, et al. Usefulness of free-breathing readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) for detection of malignant liver tumors: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI)[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(10): 1728-1733.
[11]
Zhou Y, Yang R, Wang Y, et al. Histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker to predict LNM in T3 stage rectal carcinoma[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2021, 21(1): 176.
[12]
Edge SB, Compton CC. The American joint committee on cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(6): 1471-1474.
[13]
Ge YX, Hu SD, Wang Z, et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of T2 mapping and DWI for identifying malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(5): 3347-3354.
[14]
Sirin AH, Sokmen S, Unlu SM, et al. The prognostic value of tumor budding in patients who had surgery for rectal cancer with and without neoadjuvant therapy[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2019, 23(4): 333-342.
[15]
Horvat N, Carlos Tavares Rocha C, Clemente Oliveira B, et al. MRI of rectal cancer: tumor staging, imaging techniques, and management[J]. Radiographics, 2019, 39(2): 367-387.
[16]
Horvat N, Veeraraghavan H, Khan M, et al. MR imaging of rectal cancer: radiomics analysis to assess treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(3): 833-843.
[17]
Gürses B, Böge M, Altınmakas E, et al. Multiparametric MRI in rectal cancer[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2019, 25(3): 175-182.
[18]
Kalisz KR, Enzerra MD, Paspulati RM. MRI evaluation of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy[J]. Radiographics, 2019, 39(2): 538-556.
[19]
Hu H, Jiang H, Wang S, et al. 3.0 T MRI IVIM-DWI for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2021, 46(1): 134-143.
[20]
Meyer HJ, Höhn AK, Woidacki K, et al. Associations between IVIM histogram parameters and histopathology in rectal cancer[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 77: 21-27.
[21]
Hu S, Peng Y, Wang Q, et al. T2*-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) of rectal cancer: correlation with clinical histopathologic prognostic factors[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2022, 47(2): 517-529.
[22]
Jiménez de Los Santos ME, Reyes-Pérez JA, Sandoval-Nava RM, et al. The apparent diffusion coefficient is a useful biomarker in predicting treatment response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Acta Radiol Open, 2020, 9(9): 2058460120957295.
[23]
Ryu KH, Kim SH, Yoon JH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating lymph node eradication after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Acta Radiol, 2016, 57(2): 133-141.
[24]
Wiesmueller M, Wuest W, May MS, et al. Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42(7): 1305-1312.
[25]
Yeom KW, Holdsworth SJ, Van AT, et al. Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) and single-shot EPI in clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging of the pediatric brain[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2013, 200(5): W437-443.
[26]
Kim TH, Baek MY, Park JE, et al. Comparison of DWI methods in the pediatric brain: PROPELLER turbo spin-echo imaging versus readout-segmented echo-planar imaging versus single-shot echo-planar imaging[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(6): 1352-1358.
[27]
Tang C, Lin MB, Xu JL, et al. Are ADC values of readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (RESOLVE) correlated with pathological prognostic factors in rectal adenocarcinoma?[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 138.
[28]
Xia CC, Pu J, Zhang JG, et al. Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR for the evaluation of aggressive characteristics of rectal cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 12554.
[29]
Ahn JH, Kim SH, Son JH, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluation of extramural venous invasion in patients with primary rectal cancer[J]. Br J Radiol, 2019, 92 (1096): 20180821.
[30]
Aslan A, Inan I, Aktan A, et al. The utility of ADC measurement techniques for differentiation of low- and high-grade clear cell RCC[J]. Pol J Radiol, 2018, 83: e446-e451.
[31]
Alnaghy EA, El-Nahas MA, Sadek AG, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary lesions[J]. Pol J Radiol, 2018, 83: e569-e578.
[32]
Cong Q, Li G, Wang Y, et al. DW-MRI for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, correlations between ADC values with histologic differentiation and VEGF expression: A retrospective study[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 17(3): 2770-2776.
[33]
Herneth AM, Guccione S, Bednarski M. Apparent diffusion coefficient: a quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2003, 45(3): 208-213.
[34]
Attenberger UI, Pilz LR, Morelli JN, et al. Multi-parametric MRI of rectal cancer - do quantitative functional MR measurements correlate with radiologic and pathologic tumor stages?[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(7): 1036-1043.
[35]
Liu L, Liu Y, Xu L, et al. Application of texture analysis based on apparent diffusion coefficient maps in discriminating different stages of rectal cancer[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 45(6): 1798-1808.
[36]
Cho WK, Choi DH, Park HC, et al. Elevated CEA is associated with worse survival in recurrent rectal cancer[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(86): 105936-105941.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[7] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[8] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[9] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[10] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[11] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[12] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
[13] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[14] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[15] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
阅读次数
全文


摘要