切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 278 -283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.03.010

论著

联合无痛胃肠镜检查患者的肠道准备策略
杨龙宝1, 赵刚1,(), 安苗1, 秦赟1, 薛琼1, 王进海1, 董蕾1   
  1. 1. 710004 西安交通大学第二附属医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-20 出版日期:2021-06-25
  • 通信作者: 赵刚
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技计划重点研发项目(2017ZDXM-SF-046)

Bowel preparation strategy for patients undergoing painless gastroscopy combined with colonoscopy

Longbao Yang1, Gang Zhao1(), Miao An1, Yun Qin1, Qiong Xue1, Jinhai Wang1, Lei Dong1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China
  • Received:2020-08-20 Published:2021-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Gang Zhao
引用本文:

杨龙宝, 赵刚, 安苗, 秦赟, 薛琼, 王进海, 董蕾. 联合无痛胃肠镜检查患者的肠道准备策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 278-283.

Longbao Yang, Gang Zhao, Miao An, Yun Qin, Qiong Xue, Jinhai Wang, Lei Dong. Bowel preparation strategy for patients undergoing painless gastroscopy combined with colonoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(03): 278-283.

目的

探讨联合无痛胃肠镜检查患者肠道准备的优化方案,为提高肠道准备的质量及肠镜下结肠病变的检出率提供新的策略。

方法

以2016年9月至2017年5月就诊于西安交通大学第二附属医院行联合无痛胃肠镜检查的120名健康人群为研究对象,以随机分组的方式分为观察组与对照组,两组人群均常规服用泻剂,观察组加用全消化道动力药(莫沙必利),比较两组人群的肠镜操作时间、回肠插管率、肠道清洁评分(Boston评分量表法)、肠息肉及其他疾病检出率;同时比较不同服药时间的同组人群的上述各项观察指标。

结果

观察组人群的结肠镜操作时间明显少于对照组(11.6±2.8 min vs. 16.4±3.2 min,t=6.26,P<0.05);肠道清洁度方面:观察组与对照组中肠道准备良好的比例分别为83.3%及53.3%,两组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.38,P<0.05);在以服药时间为观察对象的亚组比较中,尽管观察组中检查前10 h服药与检查前12 h、8 h服药在肠道准备良好率方面总体上差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.120,P=0.210),但检查前10 h开始服药人群的肠道准备良好率最高,为95%;对照组方面,检查前8 h、10 h和12 h服药的肠道准备良好率,三组之间总体上差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.973,P=0.011),其中,仍然是检查前10 h开始服药人群的肠道准备良好率最高,为80%,并且与检查前12 h服药组间的差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.286,P=0.004);两组间在回肠插管率方面差异无统计学意义(分别为100%和98.3%);观察组的肠息肉及其他疾病检出率显著优于对照组(46.7% vs. 18.3%,χ2=3.90;P<0.05)。

结论

加用全消化道动力药物有助于改善联合无痛胃肠镜检查患者的肠道清洁度及肠道病变的检出率。联合无痛胃肠镜检查患者在检查前10 h服用泻剂有获得更好的肠道清洁度的可能。

Objective

To explore the optimal scheme of bowel preparation for patients undergoing painless gastroscopy combined with colonoscopy, so as to provide a new strategy for improving the quality of bowel preparation and detection rate of colon lesions under colonoscopy.

Methods

From September 2016 to May 2017, 120 healthy people who underwent combined painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were selected as the research objects. They were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The two groups were given laxatives regularly, while the observation group was given total decontamination drug (Mosapride). The operation time of colonoscopy, ileum intubation rate, colon cleanliness (Boston score), detection rate of colonic polyps and other diseases were compared between the two groups. At the same time, the above observation indexes in the same group of people with different medication time were compared.

Results

The operation time of colonoscopy in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (11.6±2.8 min vs. 16.4±3.2 min, t=6.26; P<0.05). In terms of colon cleanliness, 83.3% of the observation group and 53.3% of the control group had good bowel preparation (χ2=4.38, P<0.05). Among the subgroups taking the medication time as the observation object, in observation groups, there were no significant difference in the intestinal preparation rate between taking medicine 10 h before examination and taking medicine 12 h and 8 h before examination (χ2=3.120, P=0.210), but the intestinal preparation rate of the people taking medicine 10 h before examination was the highest (95%); In control groups, the intestinal preparation rates of taking medicine 8, 10 and 12 hours before examination were different (χ2=8.973, P=0.011), among them, the intestinal preparation rate of the people taking medicine 10 hours before examination was the highest, which was 80%, and the difference between the two groups (10 h vs 12 h) was statistically significant (χ2=8.286, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in ileum intubation rate between the two groups (100% and 98.3%, respectively). The detection rate of colonic polyps and other diseases in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (46.7% vs. 18.3%, χ2=3.90; P<0.05).

Conclusions

The addition of total gastrointestinal motility drugs is helpful to improve the intestinal cleanliness and the detection rate of intestinal lesions in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy combined with colonoscopy. The patients who take cathartic 10 hours before examination may get better intestinal cleanliness.

表1 不同组别肠道准备情况的比较
表2 观察组中各亚组间肠道准备情况比较(例)
表3 对照组中各亚组间肠道准备情况比较(例)
1
卢羽洁, 王福生, 乐红琴, 等. 复方聚乙二醇电解质口服方式对无痛肠镜准备效果的影响[J]. 西南国防医药, 2016, 26(5): 529-531.
2
陈洁, 李兆申, 姚银珍, 等. 改良的复方聚乙二醇电解质散进行肠道准备的效果观察[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2010, 27(6): 315-316.
3
Kim HG. Painless Colonoscopy: Avalible Techniques and Instruments[J]. Clin Endosc, 2016, 49(5): 444-448.
4
郭虹, 曹蕾, 郑玉峰, 等. 舒泰清联合莫沙必利对便秘患者肠道准备的疗效观察[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2015, 15(35): 76-77.
5
杜奕奇, 汪鹏, 王邦茂, 等.中国消化内镜诊疗相关肠道准备指南(草案)[J]. 胃肠病学, 2014, 19(6): 354-356.
6
中国医师协会内镜医师分会消化内镜专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤内镜学专业委员会. 中国消化内镜诊疗相关肠道准备指南(2019,上海)[J].中华消化内镜杂志, 2019, 36(7): 457-469.
7
叶乐平, 杨桂芳, 谷静, 等. 不同剂量聚乙二醇电解质溶液行结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较性分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2015, 32(3): 158-163.
8
樊紫青, 方海明, 钱诚, 等. 不同服药速度对聚乙二醇电解质溶液肠道准备的效果评价[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(5): 5-8.
9
郭红伟, 赵媛媛, 王海元, 等. 无痛结肠镜前聚乙二醇口服时间对肠道准备效果的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(9): 20-23.
10
吴东, 韩伟, 冯云路, 等. 复方聚乙二醇分次与单次给药用于早晨结肠镜肠道准备效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2016, 33(12): 842-846.
11
代秋颖, 张书信, 刘子号, 等. 聚乙二醇电解质散联合莫沙必利用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(14): 1778-1784.
12
李潘, 李月月, 李延青. 个体化肠道准备对肠道准备质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58(3): 113-117.
13
马琳. 不同剂量复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜术前肠道准备的应用效果[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2020, 41(2): 192-193.
14
叶彬, 王昌成, 韩成艳, 等. 莫沙比利联合二甲硅油散在慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(5): 203-207.
15
巩静, 刘莉, 高桃. 不同运动量对老年患者肠道准备清洁效果的影响[J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2019, 43(3): 212-215.
16
占俊, 汤进芝, 汪文生, 等. 不同剂型聚乙二醇电解质在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用比较[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(8): 1283-1286.
17
杜志海. 聚乙二醇电解质口服溶液在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用及护理[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018, 5(99): 79-80.
18
朱宝欣, 刘希双. 结肠镜检查前四种肠道准备方案的效果比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2017, 24(7): 1084-1089.
19
欧阳升, 汪虹. 硫酸镁与复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(3): 41-43.
20
何风娟, 田书信. 肥胖患者行无痛苦结肠镜检查的安全性评价[J]. 黑龙江医学, 2020, 44(7): 874-877.
21
王飞, 张洪印, 刘汉博, 等. 无痛肠镜与普通肠镜检查效果的对比分析[J]. 中国处方药, 2020, 18(4): 163-165.
[1] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[2] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[3] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 袁成雪, 张宗霞, 许婷, 斯郎拉姆. 三种内镜手术治疗结肠息肉的效果及安全性观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[7] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[8] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[9] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[10] 唐新, 刁德昌, 廖伟林, 林佳鑫, 汪佳豪, 李文娟, 谢嘉欣, 敖琳, 李洪明, 易小江, 卢新泉, 冯晓创. 保留神经的鞘外游离技术在腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中的近远期疗效分析:基于倾向性评分匹配的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 372-380.
[11] 张剑明, 叶文慧, 牟廷裕, 蓝孝亮, 邓海军. 腹腔镜全结直肠切除、回肠J型储袋-肛管吻合术近期并发症及防治策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 388-395.
[12] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
[13] 李英茹, 李非, 张玉茹, 刘莉婷. 单点-点压法注射纳米碳在腹腔结肠癌根治术中应用探讨[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 414-417.
[14] 屈霄, 王靓, 陆萍, 何斌, 孙敏. 外周血炎症因子及肠道菌群特征与活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者病情的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 466-470.
[15] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
阅读次数
全文


摘要