切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 87 -91. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.01.019

所属专题: 文献

护理天地

全程护理模式在结直肠肿瘤加速康复外科中的应用及临床价值
简红云1, 周丽静2, 管丽丽1, 王海江1,()   
  1. 1. 830011 新疆肿瘤医院胃肠外科
    2. 830011 新疆肿瘤医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-17 出版日期:2018-02-25
  • 通信作者: 王海江
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81560385)

Application and clinical value of whole course nursing mode in colorectal cancer accelerated rehabilitation surgery

Hongyun Jian1, Lijing Zhou2, Lili Guan1, Haijiang Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Xinjiang Tumor Hospital, Xinjiang 830011, China
    2. Nursing Department, Xinjiang Tumor Hospital, Xinjiang 830011, China
  • Received:2017-03-17 Published:2018-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Haijiang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Haijiang, Email:
引用本文:

简红云, 周丽静, 管丽丽, 王海江. 全程护理模式在结直肠肿瘤加速康复外科中的应用及临床价值[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(01): 87-91.

Hongyun Jian, Lijing Zhou, Lili Guan, Haijiang Wang. Application and clinical value of whole course nursing mode in colorectal cancer accelerated rehabilitation surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(01): 87-91.

目的

探讨全程护理模式在结直肠肿瘤加速康复外科围手术期中应用的临床价值及地位。

方法

选择2015年7月1日至2016年7月1日行腹腔镜手术治疗的150例结直肠癌患者作为研究对象,随机分为全程护理组75例和对照组75例,围手术期对照组只采用加速康复护理,全程护理组在加速康复护理的基础上予以全程护理干预,全程护理组医师与责任护士协同患者整个住院期间的诊治护理,协同主管医生及时调整治疗方案,进一步强化加速康复措施的执行。比较两组患者术后肛门首次排气排便时间、术后首次进食时间、术后下床时间、总住院时间,以及尿潴留、腹胀、肺部感染、术后疼痛、低蛋白血症等并发症的发生率。

结果

全程护理组首次排便时间(t=-13.49,P=0.034)、术后首次下床时间(t=17.067,P=0.044)、术后进食时间(t=9.704,P<0.01)、总住院时间(t=-0.195,P=0.045)均小于对照组,其在术后并发症肺部感染(χ2=4.807,P=0.028)、疼痛(χ2=5.021,P<0.025)等方面也优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。

结论

全程护理模式在结直肠肿瘤加速康复外科围术期中具有优化各项护理举措,为患者提供全程、系统、延续的整体护理,对减少术后并发症,提高患者满意度,缩短患者住院时间具有积极的临床意义。

Objective

To explore the clinical value of whole nursing model in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in perioperative colorectal surgery.

Methods

Chose 150 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery from July 2015 to July 2016 were selected as the subjects, they were randomly divided into the whole course nursing group (75 cases) and the control group (75 cases), perioperative control group with accelerated rehabilitation nursing, nursing group were given nursing intervention on the basis of accelerated rehabilitation nursing, the whole nursing group nurses and doctors cooperate with the patients during the whole hospital during the diagnosis and treatment of nursing, cooperate with doctors to adjust treatment plan in time, further promoting the implementation of accelerated rehabilitation measures. Compared two groups of patients with postoperative anal exhaust defecation time, postoperative eating for the first time, postoperative ambulation time, hospitalization time, and the incidence of complications such as urinary retention, abdominal distension, pulmonary infection, postoperative pain, hypoproteinemia and other complications.

Results

In the whole nursing group, the first defecation time (t=-13.49, P=0.034), the first postoperative ambulation time (t=17.067, P=0.044), the postoperative eating time (t=9.704, P<0.01), and total hospitalization time (t=-0.195, P=0.045) were less than the control group, the complications of postoperative pulmonary infection (χ2=4.807, P=0.028), pain (χ2=5.021, P<0.025) were also better than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P< 0.05) .

Conclusion

The whole nursing mode in colorectal surgery system provide patients with a full, systematic, continuous holistic care. Furthermore, the model can reduce the postoperative complications, improve patient′s satisfaction, shorten the hospitalization time of patients with positive significance.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较(例)
表2 两组患者相关临床指标对比(±s
表3 两组患者术后相关并发症发生率比较(例)
[1]
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome [J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(6): 630-641.
[2]
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, et al.The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Clin Nutr, 2010, 29(4): 434-440.
[3]
Holte K, Nielsen KG, Madsen JL, et al. Physiologic effects of bowel preparation [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47(8): 1397-1402.
[4]
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients infast track surgery [J]. BMJ, 2001, 322 (7284): 473-476.
[5]
林雪梅,全小明,庞秀霏, 等.快速康复外科理念在胃癌根治术后护理中的应用 [J]. 护理研究, 2015, 29(5): 543-546.
[6]
徐瑜杰,王震,陈俊强.快速康复外科在胃癌根治术中应用的系统评价 [J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2015, 22(4): 423-433.
[7]
刘真莉,余英毅,王云燕, 等.快速康复外科理念在结肠直肠癌患者护理中应用探讨 [J]. 全科护理, 2010, 7(8): 1793-1794.
[8]
Wang Q., Suo J., Jian J., et al. Effectiveness of fast-track rehabili tation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial [J]. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2012, 14(8), 1009-1014.
[9]
Woof CJ, Chong MS.Preemptive analgesia-treating postoperative pain Bypreventing the establishment of central sensitization [J]. Anesth. Aanalg, 2010, 77(2): 362-379.
[10]
曾启秀. 快速康复外科护理对胃癌患者术后康复及生活质量的影响 [J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2014, 21(5): 607-609.
[11]
高桂香,李海燕,高美华. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术疗效观察及护理体会 [J]. 中国实用医药, 2013, 8(6): 202.
[12]
刘春远等.快速康复外科在结直肠手术的应用 [J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2007.41(5): 3.
[13]
向锦.快速康复外科护理在结直肠癌围手术期的应用研究[J].数理医药学杂志2011, 24(3): 344-346.
[14]
Alcantara-moral M, Serra-Aracil X, Gil-Egeam J, et al.Observational cross-sectional study of compliance with the fasttrack protocol in elective surgery for colon cancer in Spain [J]. Int JColorectal Dis, 2014, 29 (4): 477-483.
[15]
江志伟,黎介寿,汪志明, 等, 胃癌患者应用加速康复外科治疗的安全性及有效研究 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2007, 45 (19): 1314-1317.
[16]
秦环龙,贾震易.加速康复外科在结直肠外科应用中应关注的若干问题 [J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 6(1): 2-5.
[17]
毛学惠,张伟,周文红, 等.快速康复外科理念在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术老年患者围术期的应用效果 [J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2016, 22(22): 3134-3137.
[18]
杨洋,彭南海,黄益金, 等.胸段硬膜外镇痛对腹腔镜结直肠手术后疼痛的影响及护理观察 [J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2013, 17(12): 143-145.
[19]
罗凝香,彭利芬,严凤娇.快速康复外科在结直肠癌限期手术中应用 [J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2010, 16(9): 1038-1040.
[20]
李永昌,江志伟,邵加庆, 等.加速康复外科在医疗质量改进中的作用与推广策略 [J]. 中国医院管理, 2013, 33 (12): 43-45
[21]
唐晓,李丽,陈世渝.结直肠癌外科贯彻快速康复新理念的护理 [J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2010, 29(7): 1030-1033.
[22]
Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, et a1. A meta-analysis ofselective vel3usroutine nasogaatric decompression after electivlaparotomy[J].Ann Surg, 1995, 221(5): 469-476.
[1] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[2] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[3] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[4] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[7] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[8] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[9] 朱迪, 欧阳钒, 杨丹, 华敏, 吴倩. 双轨护理在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 630-634.
[10] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[11] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[12] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[13] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[14] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[15] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要