切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (02) : 157 -160. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2015.02.10

所属专题: 文献

论著

慢传输型便秘结肠次全切除术后盲肠直肠吻合方式的探讨
高峰1,(), 杨增强1, 徐明1, 宋枫1, 吴伟强1, 赵勇1   
  1. 1. 730050 兰州军区兰州总医院结直肠肛门外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-25 出版日期:2015-04-25
  • 通信作者: 高峰
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省民生科技计划项目(144FCMD015); 军队医药卫生科研计划项目(CLZ12JA04)

Investigation on the cecum and rectum anastomosis after colon subtotal resection in patients with slow transit constipation

Feng GAO1,(), Zeng-qiang YANG1, Ming XU1, Feng SONG1, Wei-qiang WU1, Yong ZHAO1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Region, Lanzhou 730050, China
  • Received:2015-03-25 Published:2015-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Feng GAO
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: GAO Feng, Email:
引用本文:

高峰, 杨增强, 徐明, 宋枫, 吴伟强, 赵勇. 慢传输型便秘结肠次全切除术后盲肠直肠吻合方式的探讨[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 04(02): 157-160.

Feng GAO, Zeng-qiang YANG, Ming XU, Feng SONG, Wei-qiang WU, Yong ZHAO. Investigation on the cecum and rectum anastomosis after colon subtotal resection in patients with slow transit constipation[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(02): 157-160.

目的

探讨慢传输型便秘行结肠次全切除术后更合理的盲肠直肠吻合方式。

方法

对兰州军区兰州总医院连续收治并进行手术治疗的34例STC患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,男性3例,女性31例;年龄36~75岁,平均60.5岁。所有患者均选择行结肠次全切除盲肠直肠吻合,手术在常规开腹或是腹腔镜辅助下进行,盲肠直肠吻合方式采用回盲瓣对侧的盲肠侧壁与直肠残端进行端侧吻合。

结果

传统开腹施行手术18例,腹腔镜辅助手术16例。术后1~3天开始排便,6~20次/d,术后第5-6天时排便次数逐渐减少。22例患者在术后10天时大便次数减少至8次/d以内;10例患者术后出现稀水样便伴肛门疼痛,经口服易蒙停、思密达等对症处理后好转。术后发生吻合口瘘1例、切口感染5例、尿潴留2例、炎性肠梗阻2例。30例患者得到随访2月至8年,大便次数保持在1-6次/d。2例患者7年后诉肛门坠胀,排便不净感。1例患者于术后4.5年时出现不完全性肠梗阻,经保守治疗后痊愈。27例患者术后立即感觉治疗效果满意,占80%;随访过程中,所有患者自觉症状均较术前改善明显,对手术治疗满意。无围手术期死亡。

结论

对于确实需要手术治疗的STC患者,结肠次全切除盲直端侧吻合可以作为术式选择之一。

Objective

To investigate the cecum and rectum anastomosis for patients with slow transit constipation(STC)treated with subtotal colon resection.

Methods

Thirty-fourcases(3 were male and 31 females; age 36-75 years, mean 60.5 years)with STC continuously admitted for surgery at Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Region.Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were treated with subtotal colectomy and rectal cecum anastomosis in conventional open surgery or laparoscopic assisted conduct.Cecum rectal anastomosis using the ileocecal valve contralateral side wall of the cecum and rectum stump side anastomosis was performed.

Results

Implementation of traditional open surgery in 18 cases, 16 cases of laparoscopic-assisted surgery.Start of the bowel movement at 1 to 3 days after surgery with 6-20 times/d, gradually reduce the number of bowel movements after the first 5-6 days.bowel movement reduced to eight times in 10 days after stool frequency/d or less in 22 patients.10 patients with postoperative watery stools with anal pain, oral Imodium, Smecta and other symptomatic treatment improved.Complications were anastomotic fistula in one case, wound infection in five cases, urinary retention in 2 cases and inflammatory bowel obstruction in two cases.30 patients were followed up in 2 months to 8 years, stool frequency is maintained at 1-6 times/d.Two patients complained of anal swelling and not a net sense defecation after seven years.One patient with incomplete intestinal obstruction in 4.5 years after surgery.27 cases were satisfied with the feeling of immediate treatment, accounting for 80%.During follow-up, all patients symptoms were improved significantly, surgical treatment satisfaction.No perioperative deaths happen.

Conclusions

Subtotal colectomy straight blind side anastomosis can be used as one of the surgical options for patients with refractory idiopathic STC.

[1]
Reshef A, Alves-Ferreira P, Zutshi M,et al.Colectomy for slow transit constipation:effective for patients with coexistent obstructed defecation Int J Colorectal Dis,2013,28(6):841-487.
[2]
Vergara-Fernandez O, Mejía-Ovalle R, Salgado-Nesme N,et al.Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients treated with laparoscopic total colectomy for colonic inertia.Surg Today,2014,44(1):34-38.
[3]
Li F, Fu T, Tong W,et al.Effect of different surgical options on curative effect,nutrition,and health status of patients with slow transit constipation.Int J Colorectal Dis,2014,29(12):1551-1556.
[4]
Marchesi F, Percalli L, Pinna F,et al.Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistalticcecorectal anastomosis:a new step in the treatment of slow-transit constipation.SurgEndosc,2012,26(6):1528-1533.
[5]
Thayalasekeran S, Ali H, Tsai H.Novel therapies for constipation.World J Gastroenterol,2013,19(45):8247-8251.
[6]
Martellucci J, Valeri A.Colonic electrical stimulation for the treatment of slow-transit constipation:a preliminary pilot study.SurgEndosc,2014,28(2):691-697.
[7]
Bassotti G, Blandizzi C.Understanding and treating refractory constipation.World J GastrointestPharmacolTher,2014,5(2):77-85.
[8]
Alame AM, Bahna H.Evaluation of Constipation.Clin Colon Rectal Surg,2012,25(1):5-11.
[9]
Riss S, Herbst F, BirsanT,et al.Postoperative course and long term follow up after colectomy for slow transit constipation-is surgery an appropriate approach?Colorectal Dis,2009,11(3):302-307.
[10]
Gao F, Zhang SB, Zhang LY,et al.Changes in ultrastructure of the colon myenteric plexus and its significance in slow transit constipation.Chin Med J,1999,112(11):1043.
[11]
Kidane B, Lam J, ManjiF,et al.Histological Findings in Resected Bowel of Motility-disordered Patients.AmSurg,2015,81(2):185-190.
[12]
Rao SS, Welcher K.Periodic rectal motor activity:the intrinsic colonic gatekeeper?Am J Gastroenterol,1996,91(5):890-897.
[13]
Rao SS, Sadeghi P, BattersonK, etal.Altered periodic rectal motor activity:a mechanism for slow transit constipation.NeurogastroenterolMotil,2001,13(6):591-598.
[14]
Ding W, Jiang J, Feng X,et al.Novel surgery for refractory mixed constipation:Jinling procedure – technical notes and early outcome.Arch Med Sci,2014,10(6):1129-1134.
[15]
Ding W, Jiang J, Feng X,et al.Clinical and pelvic morphologic correlation after subtotal colectomy with colorectal anastomosis for combinedslow-transit constipation and obstructive defecation.Dis Colon Rectum,2015,58(1):91-96.
[1] 林庆国, 孙友刚, 刘平. 选择性痔上黏膜切除术、痔上黏膜环切术与外剥内扎术治疗中重度混合痔的效果比较[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 474-479.
[2] 邹庆涛, 张洪贞, 尹作文, 喻军, 张鹏. 食管胃结合部腺癌根治术三种消化道重建方式的临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 545-548.
[3] 李光云, 田景中, 许建国, 于浩. 全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术后食管空肠吻合口漏相关因素分析及吻合方式选择经验探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 287-290.
[4] 郭宁, 邓天伟, 胡述静. 基于腹腔镜技术的不同吻合方式用于远端胃癌根治术的近中期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 283-286.
[5] 马建勋, 杨屹立. 全腹腔镜下吻合技术在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的安全性及可行性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 417-419.
[6] 胡建昆, 杨昆. 全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 128-128.
[7] 李子禹, 李双喜, 张连海, 陕飞, 贾永宁, 苗儒林, 薛侃, 李浙民, 季加孚. 腹腔镜胃癌根治三角吻合术技术要点与意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 121-124.
[8] 杨勇, 陈茂明, 胡雄辉, 蒲国士, 李鑫, 陈渝. 腹腔镜技术用于胃癌远端根治术的消化道重建方式探讨及术后炎性反应分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 148-150.
[9] 韩超, 解曙哲, 连长红, 宋应明, 赵强. 加速康复外科理念在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 80-82.
[10] 张卫平, 吴银亚, 江滨, 丁曙晴, 皇甫少华. 回直肠侧侧吻合分流术对慢传输型便秘大鼠血清和结肠组织匀浆中5-HT含量的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 246-249.
[11] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[12] 周启阳, 何宋兵, 胡优, 陈昕, 周雨迪, 周晓俊. 第四代达芬奇机器人单孔加一腹腔镜全结肠切除术治疗慢传输型便秘一例(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 348-352.
[13] 曹永丽, 王思远, 李宜璐, 吕兵兵, 张春旭, 杨阳, 张远耀, 杨维维, 张文丽, 魏东. 腹腔镜次全结肠旷置造口盲直肠吻合术治疗老年慢传输型便秘的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 392-398.
[14] 龙赘, 杨彦, 孙念绪, 温宇. 低位直肠癌患者使用直肠拖出切除吻合术的临床优势[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(03): 228-231.
[15] 徐立宇, 陈新宇. 苦杏仁对老年慢传输型便秘大鼠结肠组织干细胞因子、酪氨酸激酶受体、间隙连接蛋白43表达的影响[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2020, 07(02): 22-25.
阅读次数
全文


摘要