切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (06) : 296 -300. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2013.06.04

所属专题: 文献

论著

MRI检查在直肠癌诊断与术前分期的应用研究
杜文峰1, 范彦婷1, 杨道贵1,()   
  1. 1. 252000 聊城市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-15 出版日期:2013-12-25
  • 通信作者: 杨道贵

Research of application of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Wen-feng DU1, Yan-ting FAN1, Dao-gui YANG1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the People’s Hospital of Liaocheng City, Liaocheng 252000, China
  • Received:2013-08-15 Published:2013-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Dao-gui YANG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: YANG Dao-gui, Email:
引用本文:

杜文峰, 范彦婷, 杨道贵. MRI检查在直肠癌诊断与术前分期的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2013, 02(06): 296-300.

Wen-feng DU, Yan-ting FAN, Dao-gui YANG. Research of application of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(06): 296-300.

目的

探讨3.0T MRI对直肠癌患者术前判断T、N分期以及测量直肠肿瘤下缘与肛缘间曲线距离的准确性。

方法

经术前肠镜活检病理证实为直肠癌的患者53例,于术前行MRI扫描,进行T、N分期并测量肿瘤下缘与肛缘间的距离。以术后病理结果为标准,验证3.0T MRI评价肿瘤T、N分期的准确性;用MRI测量出的肿瘤下缘与肛缘曲线的距离与手术标本测量的结果相比较,找出两种结果的相关性。

结果

MRI对直肠癌患者T、N分期判定的准确率分别为83.1%、67.9%,统计学分析显示与病理结果有较好的一致性。MRI测量肿瘤下缘与肛缘的曲线距离与手术标本测得的数值无明显统计学差异。

结论

MRI对直肠癌患者术前T、N分期的判定以及测量肿瘤下缘与肛缘间的曲线距离有较高的准确性,对术前治疗及手术方式的选择有很好的指导意义。

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)for preoperative T/N staging of rectal cancer and distance from the anal verge to the tumor.

Methods

3.0T MRI was performed in 53 patients with primary rectal cancer prior to surgery, and assess its value in T/N staging.The final pathological result of surgical specimen was taken as standard.To analyze the correlation between MRI and pathology results in respect of measuring the distance from tumor to anus margin.

Results

The overall accuracy of T-staging and N-staging was 83.1% and 67.9%.There was no obvious difference between the result of T/N staging with MRI and postoperative histological staging.There was no significant statistical difference between MRI and resected specimens in determining the distance from the anal verge to tumor.

Conclusions

MRI could accurately evaluate preoperative T/N-staging of rectal cancer and assess the distance between the anal verge and the carcinoma.Therefore MRI is more reliable for preoperative treatment and selecting the optimum surgical modality for individual patient.

图1 直肠癌T分期在核磁检查中的表现图像
图2 直肠癌阳性淋巴结在核磁检查中的表现图像及肿瘤下缘与肛缘距离的测量示意图
表1 MRI与病理学对直肠癌T分期对照表
表2 MRI与病理学对直肠癌病例的N分期对照
[1]
Thaler W,Wtzka S,martin F,et al.Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs magnetic resonace imaging.Dis Colon Rcetum,1994,37:1189.
[2]
Philippe Soyer,Matthieu Lagadec,Marc Sirol,et al.Free-breathing diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging using parallel imaging(GRAPPA 2)and high b value for the detection of primary rectal adenocarcinoma.Cancer Imaging ,2010,10:32-39.
[3]
Brown G,Richards CJ,Bourne MW,et al.Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.Radiology,2003,227(2):371–377.
[4]
Goh V,Halligan S,Bartram CI.Local radiological staging of rectal cancer.Clin Radio,2004,59:215-226.
[5]
Christian Klessen,Patrik Rogalla,Matthias Taupitz.Local staging of rectal cancer:the current role of MRI.Eur J Radiol,2007,17:379–389.
[6]
KimJH,Beets GL,Kim MJ,et al.High resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer:are there any criteria in addition to the size.Eur J Radiol,2004,52:78–83.
[7]
BrownG,Richards CJ,Bourne MW,et al.Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.Radiology,2003,227(2):371–377.
[8]
柏根基,王书中,张辉,等.磁共振扩散加权成像在胃肠道良、恶性病变诊断中的应用价值.临床放射学杂志,2007,26(3):270-273.
[9]
Wexner SD,Bashankaev B.低位直肠癌保肛手术的现状与争议.中华外科杂志,2009,47(13):971-974.
[10]
叶云.直肠癌的磁共振成像术前分期研究进展.中华实用中西医杂志,2007,20(ll):1009.
[11]
李震,沙儒,徐惠绵.纤维结肠镜和直肠指诊判定直肠癌.中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(6):305-307.
[1] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[5] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[12] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[13] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[14] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[15] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?