切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (06) : 296 -300. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2013.06.04

所属专题: 文献

论著

MRI检查在直肠癌诊断与术前分期的应用研究
杜文峰1, 范彦婷1, 杨道贵1,()   
  1. 1. 252000 聊城市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-15 出版日期:2013-12-25
  • 通信作者: 杨道贵

Research of application of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Wen-feng DU1, Yan-ting FAN1, Dao-gui YANG1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the People’s Hospital of Liaocheng City, Liaocheng 252000, China
  • Received:2013-08-15 Published:2013-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Dao-gui YANG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: YANG Dao-gui, Email:
引用本文:

杜文峰, 范彦婷, 杨道贵. MRI检查在直肠癌诊断与术前分期的应用研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2013, 02(06): 296-300.

Wen-feng DU, Yan-ting FAN, Dao-gui YANG. Research of application of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(06): 296-300.

目的

探讨3.0T MRI对直肠癌患者术前判断T、N分期以及测量直肠肿瘤下缘与肛缘间曲线距离的准确性。

方法

经术前肠镜活检病理证实为直肠癌的患者53例,于术前行MRI扫描,进行T、N分期并测量肿瘤下缘与肛缘间的距离。以术后病理结果为标准,验证3.0T MRI评价肿瘤T、N分期的准确性;用MRI测量出的肿瘤下缘与肛缘曲线的距离与手术标本测量的结果相比较,找出两种结果的相关性。

结果

MRI对直肠癌患者T、N分期判定的准确率分别为83.1%、67.9%,统计学分析显示与病理结果有较好的一致性。MRI测量肿瘤下缘与肛缘的曲线距离与手术标本测得的数值无明显统计学差异。

结论

MRI对直肠癌患者术前T、N分期的判定以及测量肿瘤下缘与肛缘间的曲线距离有较高的准确性,对术前治疗及手术方式的选择有很好的指导意义。

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)for preoperative T/N staging of rectal cancer and distance from the anal verge to the tumor.

Methods

3.0T MRI was performed in 53 patients with primary rectal cancer prior to surgery, and assess its value in T/N staging.The final pathological result of surgical specimen was taken as standard.To analyze the correlation between MRI and pathology results in respect of measuring the distance from tumor to anus margin.

Results

The overall accuracy of T-staging and N-staging was 83.1% and 67.9%.There was no obvious difference between the result of T/N staging with MRI and postoperative histological staging.There was no significant statistical difference between MRI and resected specimens in determining the distance from the anal verge to tumor.

Conclusions

MRI could accurately evaluate preoperative T/N-staging of rectal cancer and assess the distance between the anal verge and the carcinoma.Therefore MRI is more reliable for preoperative treatment and selecting the optimum surgical modality for individual patient.

图1 直肠癌T分期在核磁检查中的表现图像
图2 直肠癌阳性淋巴结在核磁检查中的表现图像及肿瘤下缘与肛缘距离的测量示意图
表1 MRI与病理学对直肠癌T分期对照表
表2 MRI与病理学对直肠癌病例的N分期对照
[1]
Thaler W,Wtzka S,martin F,et al.Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs magnetic resonace imaging.Dis Colon Rcetum,1994,37:1189.
[2]
Philippe Soyer,Matthieu Lagadec,Marc Sirol,et al.Free-breathing diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging using parallel imaging(GRAPPA 2)and high b value for the detection of primary rectal adenocarcinoma.Cancer Imaging ,2010,10:32-39.
[3]
Brown G,Richards CJ,Bourne MW,et al.Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.Radiology,2003,227(2):371–377.
[4]
Goh V,Halligan S,Bartram CI.Local radiological staging of rectal cancer.Clin Radio,2004,59:215-226.
[5]
Christian Klessen,Patrik Rogalla,Matthias Taupitz.Local staging of rectal cancer:the current role of MRI.Eur J Radiol,2007,17:379–389.
[6]
KimJH,Beets GL,Kim MJ,et al.High resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer:are there any criteria in addition to the size.Eur J Radiol,2004,52:78–83.
[7]
BrownG,Richards CJ,Bourne MW,et al.Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.Radiology,2003,227(2):371–377.
[8]
柏根基,王书中,张辉,等.磁共振扩散加权成像在胃肠道良、恶性病变诊断中的应用价值.临床放射学杂志,2007,26(3):270-273.
[9]
Wexner SD,Bashankaev B.低位直肠癌保肛手术的现状与争议.中华外科杂志,2009,47(13):971-974.
[10]
叶云.直肠癌的磁共振成像术前分期研究进展.中华实用中西医杂志,2007,20(ll):1009.
[11]
李震,沙儒,徐惠绵.纤维结肠镜和直肠指诊判定直肠癌.中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(6):305-307.
[1] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[2] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[8] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[9] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[10] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[11] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
[12] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[13] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[14] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[15] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
阅读次数
全文


摘要