Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05): 431-436. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.05.005

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of high resolution thin slice rectal magnetic resonance imaging (3.0T RESOLVE-DWI) in clinical staging of rectal cancer

Jingjing Ding1, Jinlong Luo2, Ruiteng Zeng3, Jiayu Sun3, Lihong Xing3, Hongjing Zhang3, Xueting Liu1, Yuan Li3,(), Lie Yang1,(), Zongguang Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zigong NO.4 People′s Hospital, Zigong 643000, China
    3. Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-07-27 Online:2018-10-25 Published:2018-10-25
  • Contact: Yuan Li, Lie Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Yuan, Email:
    Yang Lie, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of MRI of high resolution layer in rectal cancer at 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) for diagnosing rectal cancer, and analyze the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and pathological results of tumor.

Methods

We retrospectively analyses 75 patients with radical surgical and pathological proved rectal cancer. All patients received high resolution layer rectal 3.0T MRI, to evaluate the correlation between MRI and pathology by estimating invasive depth and measuring the ADC value in different type of group.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy of high resolution layer rectal MRI for pathological changes in T1, T2, T3, and T4 was 0%, 38.1%, 72%, 14.3% in the group of non-preoperative therapy, and 50%, 33%, 75%, 0% in the group of preoperative therapy. There was poor consistency between T stage of MRI and pathology whether in group of non-preoperative therapy (κ=0.200) or preoperative therapy (κ=0.270). There was no significant correlation between the ADC value of tumors and groups of various T stage. There was also no significant correlation between the ADC value of tumors and groups of various differentiation grades. Non-preoperative therapy group (F=0.074, P=0.929; F=0.737, P=0.496) and preoperative therapy group (F=1.889, P=0.783; F=4.385, P=0.627). There was a significant difference between the patients with lymph metastasis and those without lymph metastasis in non-preoperative therapy group (F=0.073, P=0.012), and there was no significant difference in preoperative therapy group (F=0.035, P=0.793).

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of high resolution layer rectal MRI for pathological changes in T3 is high, but the overall accuracy rate is low. ADC value of high resolution layer rectal MRI has some value in evaluated the lymph metastasis and need further study.

Key words: Colonic neoplasms, Pathological staging, 3.0T RESOLVE-DWI, ADC value

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd