切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 470 -476. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2026.05.013

病例报道

一例直肠癌同时性肝转移合并脾曲腹膜种植的诊疗启示与多学科处理
关竣庭, 陈吉远, 潘胜淇, 李琦, 王贵玉†(), 汤庆超†()   
  1. 150086 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-26 出版日期:2026-10-25
  • 通信作者: 王贵玉, 汤庆超
  • 基金资助:
    四大慢病重大专项(2024ZD0520100)

Diagnostic insights and multidisciplinary management of a case of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis and peritoneal seeding at the splenic flexure

Junting Guan, Jiyuan Chen, Shengqi Pan, Qi Li, Guiyu Wang†(), Qingchao Tang†()   

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
  • Received:2026-05-26 Published:2026-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Guiyu Wang, Qingchao Tang
引用本文:

关竣庭, 陈吉远, 潘胜淇, 李琦, 王贵玉, 汤庆超. 一例直肠癌同时性肝转移合并脾曲腹膜种植的诊疗启示与多学科处理[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 470-476.

Junting Guan, Jiyuan Chen, Shengqi Pan, Qi Li, Guiyu Wang, Qingchao Tang. Diagnostic insights and multidisciplinary management of a case of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis and peritoneal seeding at the splenic flexure[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(05): 470-476.

报道1例壁外血管侵犯(EMVI)阳性直肠癌患者的诊治经过。患者男,61岁,术前MRI提示cT3N1并EMVI阳性,同期CT未见远处转移。2025年7月行直肠癌根治术,术后病理为pT3N1b,并见血管侵犯、神经侵犯、肿瘤沉积和高级别肿瘤出芽。因术后乏力、纳差等原因暂缓化疗。9月复查发现肝左叶小结节,遂行肝部分切除并同期还纳回肠造口;术中探查发现脾曲附近腹膜结节并一并切除。病理证实肝病灶及腹膜结节均为结直肠癌转移,分期修订为pT3N1bM1c(ⅣC期)。二代测序显示KRAS p.G13D突变、微卫星稳定(MSS),免疫组化提示错配修复蛋白表达完整(pMMR),随后给予卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(CAPEOX)方案联合贝伐珠单抗共8周期。2026年5月26日第八周期治疗时复查未见明确进展。本例显示,对于MRI提示EMVI阳性的直肠癌患者,常规CT未见转移并不能完全排除小体积肝转移或低负荷腹膜种植;术中细致探查和分子检测有助于修正分期并安排后续治疗。

This report presents the clinical course of a 61-year-old man with rectal cancer positive for extramural vascular invasion (EMVI). Preoperative MRI suggested cT3N1 disease with positive EMVI, while CT did not show distant metastasis. Radical surgery in July 2025 revealed pT3N1b disease with vascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor deposits, and high-grade tumor budding. Chemotherapy was postponed because of postoperative fatigue, poor intake, and reduced performance status. During reassessment in September 2025, a small lesion was found in the left liver. Partial hepatectomy and ileostomy closure were performed, and intraoperative exploration also identified a peritoneal nodule near the splenic flexure. Pathology confirmed colorectal metastases in both lesions, and the stage was revised to pT3N1bM1c. Next-generation sequencing showed KRAS p.G13D mutation and microsatellite stable (MSS) status, and immunohistochemistry indicated proficient mismatch repair (pMMR). The patient subsequently received 8 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPEOX) plus bevacizumab, with no definite progression on imaging at the eighth cycle on May 26, 2026. This case indicates that negative routine CT findings do not fully exclude small-volume liver or peritoneal metastases in rectal cancer with MRI-detected EMVI. Careful intraoperative exploration and molecular testing may help refine staging and guide subsequent treatment.

图1 一例KRAS G13D突变型直肠腺癌患者出现肝转移与脾曲腹膜种植的临床过程、系列影像与血清CEA动态变化。1A为临床诊疗时间轴,展示自初诊至2026年5月26日末次化疗期间的关键诊疗节点;第二次手术中发现脾曲附近腹膜结节,病理标本大小约1.0 cm×0.6 cm×0.4 cm,该病灶在术前CT中未被明确识别。1B为腹部CT代表性图像,受原始影像条件限制,各时间点难以取得完全一致的扫描层面,已尽量选取显示肝左叶外侧段的相近层面:2025年6月30日术前平扫CT肝左叶外侧段未见明确转移灶;2025年9月25日增强CT见肝左叶外侧段结节(箭头),约14 mm×9 mm,三期扫描呈环形强化,考虑转移;2025年12月30日及2026年3月4日CT示肝切除术后瘢痕(箭头),未见明确进展。1C为全病程血清CEA动态变化,虚线为参考范围上限(5 ng/mL);初诊时CEA升高(8.66 ng/mL),术后各时间点均处于参考范围内。R为患者右侧,L为患者左侧。CEA为癌胚抗原;MRI为磁共振成像;EMVI为壁外血管侵犯;TME为全直肠系膜切除;D3为第三站淋巴结清扫;NGS为二代测序;MSS为微卫星稳定;IHC为免疫组化;pMMR为错配修复蛋白表达完整;PD-L1为程序性死亡受体配体1;TPS为肿瘤细胞阳性比例评分;CPS为联合阳性评分;CAPEOX为卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂
表1 第一次手术(2025-07-03)术后病理主要结果
图2 直肠原发灶与肝转移灶组织学形态学一致性的对比(苏木精-伊红染色×100)。2A为直肠原发灶,病理号202541905,2025年7月3日切除,示中分化管状腺癌;2B为肝转移灶,病理号202562536,2025年9月28日切除,腺管结构形态与直肠原发灶一致,支持结直肠来源转移
表2 原发灶分子病理检测主要结果
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
[2]
Weiser MR. AJCC 8th edition: colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(6): 1454-1455.
[3]
Shida D, Boku N, Nakamura Y, et al. Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of M category as defined by the 7th and 8th editions of the tumor-node-metastasis classification of colorectal cancer and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(20): 6937-6946.
[4]
Ko Y, Kim J, Park JK, et al. Limited detection of small (≤10 mm) colorectal liver metastasis at preoperative CT in patients undergoing liver resection[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(12): e0189797.
[5]
Koh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, et al. Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16(2): 327-333.
[6]
Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, et al. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis[J]. Cancer, 1993, 72(5): 1631-1636.
[7]
Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J. Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment[J]. Radiology, 2010, 257(3): 674-684.
[8]
Jhaveri KS, Fischer SE, Hosseini-Nik H, et al. Prospective comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and contrast-enhanced CT with histopathological correlation for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases following chemotherapy and potential impact on surgical plan[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2017, 19(11): 992-1000.
[9]
Vandecaveye V, Rousset P, Nougaret S, et al. Imaging of peritoneal metastases of ovarian and colorectal cancer: joint recommendations of ESGAR, ESUR, PSOGI and EANM[J]. Eur Radiol, 2025, 35(5): 2712-2722.
[10]
Sohn B, Lim JS, Kim H, et al. MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor for synchronous metastasis in patients with rectal cancer[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(5): 1347-1355.
[11]
Siddiqui MRS, Simillis C, Hunter C, et al. A meta-analysis comparing the risk of metastases in patients with rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) vs mrEMVI-negative cases[J]. Br J Cancer, 2017, 116(12): 1513-1519.
[12]
Lugli A, Kirsch R, Ajioka Y, et al. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016[J]. Mod Pathol, 2017, 30(9): 1299-1311.
[13]
Lord AC, D’Souza N, Pucher PH, et al. Significance of extranodal tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2017, 82: 92-102.
[14]
Keller DS, Berho M, Perez RO, et al. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 17(7): 414-429.
[15]
Engstrand J, Strömberg C, Nilsson H, et al. Synchronous and metachronous liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer—towards a clinically relevant definition[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2019, 17(1): 228.
[16]
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M]. 8th ed. New York: Springer, 2017.
[17]
Quénet F, Elias D, Roca L, et al. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery alone for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PRODIGE 7): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(2): 256-266.
[18]
Morris VK, Kennedy EB, Baxter NN, et al. Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: ASCO guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(3): 678-700.
[19]
Lu D, Dong C, Wang K, et al. Updates of CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer version 2025[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2025, 37(3): 297-302.
[20]
Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2023, 34(1): 10-32.
[21]
Modest DP, Ricard I, Heinemann V, et al. Outcome according to KRAS-, NRAS- and BRAF-mutation as well as KRAS mutation variants: pooled analysis of five randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancer by the AIO colorectal cancer study group[J]. Ann Oncol, 2016, 27(9): 1746-1753.
[22]
Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the TRIBE study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(13): 1306-1315.
[1] 侯刘进, 贺智翔, 戴清清, 黄帆, 耿小平, 赵红川, 汪正广. 三种同期手术切除方式治疗结直肠癌肝转移的安全性和预后比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 291-296.
[2] 杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 杨建玲. 基于解剖学基础的新辅助治疗后腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 297-301.
[3] 胡青, 周引涵, 塔来提·吐尔干, 阿依甫汗·阿汗. 结直肠癌肝转移免疫微环境的器官特异性机制整合与展望[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 330-339.
[4] 邹凯翔, 许诗语, 陈创奇. 结直肠癌免疫治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 281-289.
[5] 梁承友, 姚德炯, 叶志刚, 王敏, 张小容, 方舒, 朱明, 廖介. 以IMA为轴心的No.253组淋巴结清扫在保留左结肠动脉的直肠癌根治术中对自主神经的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 463-467.
[6] 夏明宇, 刘光昊, 孙倩男, 刘宾, 王道荣. 基于炎症与营养指标的早发型直肠癌患者预后列线图的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 468-473.
[7] 杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 周烨, 杨建玲. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 343-346.
[8] 鲁峰刚, 刘宇, 张毅, 王秦玉. 新辅助放化疗直肠癌根治术患者术后吻合口漏影响因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 347-351.
[9] 杨浚沫, 曾奕淙, 张序东, 周何. 腹腔镜技术在低位进展期直肠癌保肛手术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 402-405.
[10] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[11] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的疗效及对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 257-260.
[12] 魏利敏, 金鲜珍, 刘萍, 王光辉. 两种微创术式治疗低位直肠癌的学习曲线与近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-266.
[13] 徐正, 张岳阳, 高畅远, 张若愚, 王哲学, 商济桓, 陈海鹏, 梁建伟, 郑朝旭, 刘骞, 王锡山, 周海涛. 术前阴道准备时长对结直肠癌经阴道取标本术后短期结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 419-426.
[14] 陈阳, 刘吉祥, 胡军红. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术NOSES Ⅳ式的基层医院临床应用体会(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 375-379.
[15] 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会, 中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科医师专家组. 结直肠癌人工智能应用场景评测专家共识(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 289-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?