切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 129 -134. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2024.02.006

论著

肠减压后腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌合并急性肠梗阻的临床观察
连彦军1,(), 宋志岗1, 范晓斌1, 胡延伟1, 范现英1, 马竞优1, 甄金朋1, 杨宁豹1   
  1. 1. 054000 河北邢台市中心医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-10 出版日期:2024-04-25
  • 通信作者: 连彦军
  • 基金资助:
    河北省卫建委重点科技研究计划(20242163)

Experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy after ileal decompression in the management of acute obstructive right-sided colon carcinoma

Yanjun Lian1,(), Zhigang Song1, Xiaobin Fan1, Yanwei Hu1, Xianying Fan1, Jingyou Ma1, Jinpeng Zhen1, Ningbao Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gatroenterology Surgery, Xingtai Central Hospital, Xingtai 054000, China
  • Received:2023-05-10 Published:2024-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Yanjun Lian
引用本文:

连彦军, 宋志岗, 范晓斌, 胡延伟, 范现英, 马竞优, 甄金朋, 杨宁豹. 肠减压后腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌合并急性肠梗阻的临床观察[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 129-134.

Yanjun Lian, Zhigang Song, Xiaobin Fan, Yanwei Hu, Xianying Fan, Jingyou Ma, Jinpeng Zhen, Ningbao Yang. Experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy after ileal decompression in the management of acute obstructive right-sided colon carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(02): 129-134.

目的

探讨腹部辅助小切口回肠减压后再行腹腔镜右半结肠切除手术治疗右半结肠癌合并急性肠梗阻的可行性及近期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年12月河北邢台市中心医院胃肠外科收治的52例右半结肠癌伴急性肠梗阻患者的临床资料,22例行腹部小切口回肠减压后即刻腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除(研究组),30例行传统开腹右半结肠切除术(对照组),比较两组患者在手术时间、手术出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症以及炎症指标等方面的变化。

结果

研究组和对照组两组患者的基本资料具有可比性。与对照组相比,研究组手术出血量少(t=-2.808,P=0.008),术后肛门排气时间快(t=-3.588,P=0.001),手术时间有所延长(t=8.257,P=0.000)。研究组和对照组的淋巴结清扫数目(t=-0.716,P=0.478)、住院时间(t=-0.344,P=0.740)差异无统计学意义。术后近期并发症发生率分别为13.64%和26.67%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.292,P=0.256)。研究组和对照组术前IL-6(t=-1.101,P=0.277)、TNF-α(t=1.088,P=0.283)、CRP(t=-1.191,P=0.202)差异均无统计学意义。两组术后上述三项指标水平均高于术前,但研究组升高程度低于对照组,研究组和对照组术后IL-6(t=-4.340,P<0.001)、TNF-α(t=-6.686,P<0.001)、CRP(t=-5.930,P<0.001)差异具有统计学意义。

结论

对右半结肠癌合并急性肠梗阻患者于回肠减压后即刻行腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术一期肠吻合,能有效解决腹腔镜操作空间受限问题,并减少术中出血、促进术后胃肠功能、减轻机体的炎症反应,具有一定临床价值。

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy after intestinal decompression through a small abdominal incision in the management of acute obstructive right-side colon carcinoma.

Methods

Twenty-two patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy after ileal decompression through small abdominal incision due to acute obstructive right- side colon carcinoma (the study group) were retrospectively matched with thirty patients scheduled for a conventional open right hemicolectomy (the control group) during the same period from January 2017 to December 2022. The operation time, blood loss, number of dissected lymph node, the time of anal exhaust, the duration of hospitalization, postoperative complications and levels of serum inflammatory factors were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in clinic data between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the study group had less blood loss (t=-2.808, P=0.008) and faster anal exhaust time (t=-3.588, P=0.001), longer operation time (t=8.257, P=0.000). The number of dissected lymph nodes (t=-0.716, P=0.478), and the duration of hospitalization (t=-0.344, P=0.740) in the study group and the control group were with no significent difference. There was no significant difference in short-term postoperative complications (χ2=1.292, P=0.256) between the study group (13.64%) and the control group (26.67%). The levels of IL-6 (t=-1.101, P=0.277), TNF-α (t=1.088, P=0.283) and CRP (t=-1.191, P=0.202) in the study group and the control group before operation were with no significant difference. The levels of the above three indexes in the two groups were higher after surgery than before surgery, but the increase degree in the study group was lower than that in the control group. There were statistically significant differences in IL-6 (t=-4.340, P<0.001), TNF-α (t=-6.686, P<0.001) and CRP (t=-5.930, P<0.001) between the study group and the control group.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy after ileal decompression through a small abdominal incision in acute obstructive right-sided colon carcinoma is safe and feasible, it can effectively solve the problem of limited laparoscopic operating space, reduce bleeding, promote gastrointestinal function and reduce inflammatory reaction.

图1 术前CT检查结果
图2 肠减压前,肠管扩张,腹腔空间小
图3 上腹部小切口回肠减压
图4 肠减压后中间入路手术
图5 腔镜下游离完成
表1 两组患者的基线资料比较(,例)
表2 两组手术相关指标比较(
表3 手术前后两组炎症因子水平比较(
[1]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局,中华医学会肿瘤学分会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(6): 601-625.
[2]
孙跃明, 封益飞, 张冬生, 等. 以肠系膜上动脉为导向的右半结肠全结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(8): 753-760.
[3]
曹可, 王振军, 韩加刚. 热点聚焦——论梗阻性结直肠癌的治疗[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2023, 26(1): 44-50.
[4]
Kaplan J, Strongin A, Adler DG, et al. Enteral stents for the anagement of malignant colorectal obstruction[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(37): 13239-13245.
[5]
揭月高, 高洪彦, 张海峰. 腔镜手术前支架置入对结肠癌梗阻患者手术效果及预后的影响[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(10): 778-781.
[6]
刘入铭, 林浩. 术前经肛门肠梗阻导管减压后的Ⅰ期根治性切除吻合术对左半结肠癌急性肠梗阻患者的临床疗效[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 27(2): 153-157.
[7]
郭永团, 杜洪涛, 李德春. 经鼻型肠梗阻导管置入联合腹腔镜治疗回盲部恶性肠梗阻[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2021, 33(11): 1922-1924.
[8]
刘少杰, 任镜清, 罗辉兴, 等. 手助腹腔镜在右半结肠癌并急性肠梗阻中的应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2016, 29(6): 459-462.
[9]
田龙, 雷勇. 手助腹腔镜左半结肠癌并急性梗阻一期切除吻合术47例[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)2014, 7(5): 368-371.
[10]
Li Z, Li D, Jie Z, et al. Comparative study on therapeutic efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for acute obstructive right-sided colon cancer[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(7): 548-554.
[1] 金田力, 袁文正, 付涛. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后尿管拔除时机探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-274.
[2] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[3] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[4] 胡剑平, 王振乾, 张龙, 尹任其, 陈涵, 赵任, 吕强. 尾侧中间联合入路与尾侧入路在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 196-199.
[5] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[6] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[7] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[8] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[9] 焦盛宇, 雷庆军, 周圣赢, 王兵, 孔智渊, 张剑, 徐小慧. 35例闭孔疝患者临床诊断和治疗分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 202-207.
[10] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[11] 陈亚军, 姜玉娟, 周思成, 陈海鹏, 王征, 周海涛, 毕建军, 冯强, 郑朝旭, 姜争, 刘正, 梁建伟, 裴炜, 张海增, 汤坚强, 刘骞, 王锡山. 重组改构人肿瘤坏死因子用于进展期结肠癌患者术中腹腔灌注治疗的近期安全性及可行性分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 94-100.
[12] 李凯, 朱志, 周海涛, 王俊, 杨野, 赵鑫, 谷金蓉, 智冬梅, 王世洋, 高梓茗, 张鑫炜, 赵睿涵, 王锡山, 王振宁. 经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)在结直肠癌日间手术中的应用探索[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 63-67.
[13] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[14] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(09): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要