切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06) : 602 -605. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

选择性痔上黏膜环切术对直肠内套叠的临床疗效观察
鞠曼1, 夏超锋1, 刘文慧2, 郑万磊3,(), 董典博1, 史甜1   
  1. 1. 252000 聊城市人民医院肛肠外科
    2. 252000 聊城市人民医院皮肤科
    3. 252000 聊城市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-23 出版日期:2019-12-25
  • 通信作者: 郑万磊

Observation of curative effect of tissue-selecting therapy stapler on treating internal rectal prolapse

man Ju1, Chaofeng Xia1, Wenhui Liu2, Wanlei Zheng3,(), Dianbo Dong1, Tian Shi1   

  1. 1. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Liaocheng People′s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
    2. Department of Dermatology, Liaocheng People′s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
    3. Gastrointestinal Surgery, Liaocheng People′s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
  • Received:2017-01-23 Published:2019-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Wanlei Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Wanlei, Email:
引用本文:

鞠曼, 夏超锋, 刘文慧, 郑万磊, 董典博, 史甜. 选择性痔上黏膜环切术对直肠内套叠的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(06): 602-605.

man Ju, Chaofeng Xia, Wenhui Liu, Wanlei Zheng, Dianbo Dong, Tian Shi. Observation of curative effect of tissue-selecting therapy stapler on treating internal rectal prolapse[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(06): 602-605.

目的

分析选择性痔上黏膜环切术(TST)对直肠内套叠造成的出口梗阻性便秘的临床疗效。

方法

收集聊城市人民医院肛肠外科于2013年1月至2015年1月期间收治的200例直肠内套叠的临床资料,根据术式分为选择性痔上黏膜环切术(TST)组(n=100)和痔上黏膜环切钉合术(PPH)组(n=100),比较两组患者的临床疗效及住院时间,同时对术后疼痛、尿潴留、出血、肛门坠胀、吻合口狭窄等并发症的发生情况进行比较。

结果

TST组与PPH组患者有效率分别为81%和79%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.13,P>0.05);TST组患者住院时间明显少于PPH组(χ2=35.24,P<0.01);除术后6小时以外,TST组术后疼痛(χ224 h=5.71,χ248 h=5.38,χ272 h=7.73;P<0.05)、尿潴留(χ2=9.28,P<0.05)、出血(χ2=7.04,P<0.01)、肛门坠胀(χ2=23.86,P<0.01)、吻合口狭窄(χ2=23.46,P<0.01)等并发症的发生率均明显低于PPH组,比较差异有统计学意义。

结论

TST治疗直肠内套叠临床疗效显著,且住院时间短,术后并发症少。

Objective

To observe clincal curative effect of tissue-selecting therapy stapper (TST) on treating internal rectal prolapse.

Methods

The clinical data of 200 patients with internal rectal prolapse of Liaocheng People′s Hospital Anorectal Department from January 2013 to January 2015 were collected and divided into TST group (n=100) and PPH group (n=100) according to the surgical methods. The clinical efficacy and hospitalization time of the two groups were compared. The postoperative pain, urinary retention, bleeding, anal swelling and anastomotic stenosis were also compared.

Results

The curative effects of TST group and PPH one were 81% and 79%, respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.13, P>0.05); hospitalization time of TST group was significantly less than that of PPH group (χ2=35.24, P<0.01); Postoperative pain (χ224h=5.71, χ248h=5.38, χ272h=7.73; P<0.05), urinary retention (χ2=9.28, P<0.05), bleeding (χ2=7.04, P<0.01), anastomotic stenosis (χ2=23.46, P<0.01), anal swelling (χ2=23.86, P<0.01) in TST group were all significantly lower than that in PPH one, except for 6 hour pain after surgery.

Conclusion

TST is effective in the treatment of rectal intussusception, with shorter hospitalization time and fewer postoperative complications.

表1 两组患者的临床资料比较(例)
表2 临床样本观察指标评分标准
表3 术后1个月两组患者手术疗效比较(例)
表4 术后两组患者并发症情况比较(例)
[1]
Xin Z, Yue T, Weidong T. Relationship of TRPV1/5-HT expression in intestinal mucosa and rectal compliance in patients with internal rectal prolapse [J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2013, 35(21): 2282-2285.
[2]
丁义江,皇甫少华,丁曙晴, 等.直肠脱垂诊治指南[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(7): 755-757.
[3]
Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome [J]. Gastroenterology clinics of North America, 2001, 30(1): 199-222.
[4]
中华医学会消化病学分会胃肠动力学组.中国慢性便秘诊治指南(2013,武汉) [J].胃肠病学,2013,18(10):605-612.
[5]
Formijne-Jonkers HA, Poierrie N, Draaisma WA, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients [J]. Colo-rectal Dis, 2013, 15(6): 695-699.
[6]
Michalopoulos A, Papadopoulos VN, Panidis S, et al. Surgical management of rectal prolapse [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2011, 15 (Suppl 1): S25-S28.
[7]
Pescatori M, Zbar AP. Tailored surgery for internal and external rectalprolapse: functional results of 268 patients operated upon by a singlesurgeon over a 21-year period [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4): 410-419.
[8]
Swash M, Snooks SJ, Mathers SE, et al. Effect of vaginal delivery ont hepelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up [J]. Br J Surg, 1990, 77(12): 1358-1360.
[9]
Berman IR, Manning DH, Dudley-Wright K. Anatomic specificity in the diagnosis and treatment of internal rectal prolapse [J]. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 1985, 28(10): 816-826.
[10]
Watts AML, Thompson MR. Evaluation of Delorme′s proceture as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse [J]. Br J Surg, 2000, 87: 218-222.
[11]
Paolo Boccasanta, Pier Giuseppe Capretti. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemor- rhoids with external mucosal prolapse [J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 182(1): 64-68.
[12]
孙浩博,孟庆辉,李龙, 等. TST治疗痔的临床疗效[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2016, 23(6): 727-731.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[9] 张朝军, 袁新普. 腹腔镜辅助低位直肠癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 602-602.
[10] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[11] 王国强, 张纲, 唐建坡, 张玉国, 杨永江. LINC00839 调节miR-17-5p/WEE1 轴对结直肠癌细胞增殖、凋亡和迁移的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 491-499.
[12] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[13] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[14] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要