切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 442 -446. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.05.007

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中应用效果评价
赵磊1,(), 刘春庆1, 刘建1, 黄涛1, 张伟1, 赵金1   
  1. 1. 102600 北京市大兴区人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-17 出版日期:2018-10-25
  • 通信作者: 赵磊

The evaluation of application of carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer

Lei Zhao1,(), Chunqing Liu1, Jian Liu1, Tao Huang1, Wei Zhang1, Jin Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, People′s Hospital of Beijing Daxing District, Beijing 102600, China
  • Received:2017-09-17 Published:2018-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Lei Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Lei, Email:
引用本文:

赵磊, 刘春庆, 刘建, 黄涛, 张伟, 赵金. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中应用效果评价[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(05): 442-446.

Lei Zhao, Chunqing Liu, Jian Liu, Tao Huang, Wei Zhang, Jin Zhao. The evaluation of application of carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(05): 442-446.

目的

评价使用纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的淋巴清扫效果。

方法

选取2016年8月至2017年8月在北京市大兴区人民医院普外科接受腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术的80例直肠癌患者,随机分为纳米碳组与对照组,每组40例。纳米碳组分两个时间点(术前16~18小时及术中)肠镜下于肿瘤下缘及侧壁黏膜下注射纳米碳,每个时间点各20例患者。根据肿瘤不同位置确定手术范围。标本切出后30 min内送至病理科,并由专人协助病理科医师分检淋巴结。

结果

纳米碳组检出的淋巴结数明显多于对照组(t=3.32,P<0.05),黑染淋巴结阳性(转移)率明显高于非黑染淋巴结阳性(转移)率(χ2=42.76,P<0.001),差异均有统计学意义。术前16~18 h组与术中注射组清除淋巴结数目、淋巴结阳性率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.032,P>0.05)。

结论

使用纳米碳可增加腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中淋巴结检出数,经纳米碳示踪出现黑染的淋巴结阳性率更高。术前16~18 h注射纳米碳效果肯定,便于临床工作安排,值得推广应用。

Objective

To evaluate lymph node dissection effect after using carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer.

Methods

Eighty patients accepted laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer in People′s Hospital of Beijing Daxing District from August 2016 to August 2017 were selected. They were randomly assigned as carbon nanoparticles group and control group, with forty patients in each group. Patients in carbon nanoparticles group received rejection of carbon nanoparticles into submucosal layer at the inferior border and lateral wall of tumor under enteroscopy guidance at two different times (16~18 hours before operation and during operation), and there were twenty patients at each time. Resection range was determined according to the location of tumor. Surgical specimens were delivered to department of pathology within thirty minutes after tumors were resected, and special person was assigned to assist lymph node sorting.

Results

The amount of detecting lymph node in carbon nanoparticles group was more than control group (t=3.32, P<0.05), and positive (metastasis) rate in black dyed lymph node was higher than non-black dyed (χ2=42.76, P<0.001), the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the amount of detecting lymph node and lymph node positive (metastasis) rate between patients rejecting carbon nanoparticles sixteen~eighteen hours before operation and during operation (χ2=0.032, P>0.05).

Conclusions

The application of carbon nanoparticles can increase the amount of detecting lymph nodes during laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer, and black dyed lymph nodes which are traced by carbon nanoparticles have higher positive rate. The effect of rejecting carbon nanoparticles sixteen~eighteen hours before operation is confirmed, also it is helpful to arrange clinical work, so this technique deserves generalization and application.

图1 结肠镜下注射纳米碳示意图
图3 注射纳米碳后手术标本2。下切缘距离肿瘤约2 cm,黑色箭头为黑染淋巴结
表1 纳米碳组与对照组患者一般情况比较
表2 术前16~18小时注射组及术中注射组患者一般情况比较
表3 纳米碳组与对照组清除淋巴结总数、平均数及淋巴结阳性率的比较
[1]
Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer [J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9927):1490-1502.
[2]
郑阳春,周总光. 前哨淋巴结定位在结直肠癌外科中的应用 [J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2003, 12(11):852-854.
[3]
杨斌,李英儒,温润龙,等. 纳米碳淋巴示踪技术应用于腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的意义 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(6):549-552.
[4]
Yan J, Xue F, Chen H, et a1. A multi-center study of using carbon nanoparticles to track lymph node metastasis in T1-2 colorectal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(12):3315-3321.
[5]
都庆国,赵洁光,马钰, 等. 结直肠癌前哨淋巴结体外定位检测的临床研究 [J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2013, 21(12):2765-2767.
[6]
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [M].7th edn. New York: Springer, 2010.
[7]
Dejardin O, Ruault E, Jooste V, et al. Volume of surgical activity and lymph node evaluation for patients with colorectal cancer in France [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2012, 44(3):261-267.
[8]
Cai HK, He HF, Tian W, et al. Colorectal cancer lymph nodestaining by activated carbon nanoparticles suspension in vivo ormethylene blue in vitro [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(42):6148-6154.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[12] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?