切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 327 -329. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2017.04.013

所属专题: 文献

经验交流

延迟阑尾炎切除术治疗急性非穿孔性阑尾炎的可行性分析
王迎新1,(), 彭传里1   
  1. 1. 152000 绥化,北林区第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-16 出版日期:2017-08-25
  • 通信作者: 王迎新

The analysis of delayed appendectomy in the treatment of patients with acute nonperforated appendicitis

Yingxin Wang1,(), Chuanli Peng1   

  1. 1. The Department of General Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of North Forest Region, Suihua 152000, China
  • Received:2017-03-16 Published:2017-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Yingxin Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yingxin, Emial:
引用本文:

王迎新, 彭传里. 延迟阑尾炎切除术治疗急性非穿孔性阑尾炎的可行性分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 06(04): 327-329.

Yingxin Wang, Chuanli Peng. The analysis of delayed appendectomy in the treatment of patients with acute nonperforated appendicitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(04): 327-329.

目的

本研究旨在探讨延迟阑尾炎切除术治疗急性非穿孔性阑尾炎的安全性和可行性。

方法

收集2004年1月至2013年2月期间在北林区第一人民医院普外科确诊为急性非穿孔性阑尾炎的患者902例,所有患者均接受了阑尾切除术。根据手术时间的不同,将患者分为两组:急诊手术组(入院后24小时内接受手术治疗)和延迟手术组(入院后24~48小时接受手术治疗)。观察指标包括手术时间、术中阑尾穿孔率、术后并发症发生率、二次住院比率、住院时间。

结果

在902例患者中,671例患者(74.3%)在住院24小时内立即接受了急诊手术治疗,而另外231例患者(25.7%)在入院后24~48小时期间进行了延迟手术治疗。两组病例在手术时间,术中阑尾穿孔比例,术后并发症发生率,以及再入院比例方面差异无统计学意义。然而,与急诊手术相比,延迟手术组患者的住院时间要明显高于急诊手术组患者(t=7.34;P=0.02)。

结论

对于急性非穿孔性阑尾炎患者,延迟阑尾切除术也是一个安全合理的选择。

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of delayed appendectomy in the treatment of acute, nonperforated appendicitis.

Methods

We collected the patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute, nonperforated appendicitis between January 2004 and February 2013in the First People′s Hospital of North Forest Region. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison: an immediate group (those who were moved to an operating room within 24 hours after hospital arrival) and a delayed group (those within 24 to 48 hours after hospital arrival). The end points were operative time, perforation rate, complication rate, readmission rate and length of hospital stay.

Results

Of 902 patients, 671 (74.3%) underwent immediate operation within 24 hours after hospital arrival, whereas 231 (25.7%) underwent delayed operation within 24 to 48 hours. There were no significant differences in operative time, perforation, postoperative complications, and readmission between the 2 groups. Length of hospital stay was significantly greater was also greater in the delayed group than in the immediate group (t=7.34; P=0.02).

Conclusion

Delayed appendectomy is safe for patients with acute nonperforated appendicitis.

表1 患者一般资料表
表2 患者围手术期相关资料
[1]
赵轶国,印建中. 应用抗生素治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的策略及其价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(05):715-719.
[2]
Berry J Jr, Malt RA. Appendicitis near its centenary[J]. Ann Surg, 1984,200(5):567–575.
[3]
Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K, et al. Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours[J]. Arch Surg,2006,141(5):504–506; discussion 506–507.
[4]
Omundsen M, Dennett E. Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2006, 76(3):153–155.
[5]
Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis[J]. Arch Surg,2010,145(9):886–892.
[6]
Bufo AJ, Shah RS, Li MH, et al. Interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,1998,8(4):209–214.
[7]
Mazziotti M, Marley E, Winthrop A, et al. Histopathologic analysis of interval appendectomy specimens: support for the role of interval appendectomy[J]. J Pediatr Surg,1997,32(6):806–809.
[8]
Hansson J, K¨orner U, Khorram-Manesh A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients[J]. Br J Surg, 2009, 96(5):473-481.
[9]
Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, et al. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(6):1033–1037.
[1] 王四维, 王晓曼, 贾立群. 新生儿阑尾炎临床及超声图像特点分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(03): 193-197.
[2] 占一姗, 朱友荣, 张守华, 陶强. 急性阑尾炎相关诊断预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 151-154.
[3] 李闯, 林湘杰, 樊敬文, 杨雪菲. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术临床应用现状的范围综述[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 366-370.
[4] 高晋鸿, 郝少龙, 刘勇, 韩威, 翁以炳. 加速康复外科理念下围手术期疼痛管理在日间腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 146-150.
[5] 吴国刚, 金爱莉, 蔡首亮, 刘兆润, 冷梅, 金逸盈, 石若玉, 王福鑫. 发病时间大于72小时的急性阑尾炎腹腔镜手术疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 446-448.
[6] 刘俊杰, 赵晋明, 谷昊, 祝志强. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术残端夹闭与缝合包埋疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 314-320.
[7] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[8] 冯树森, 张东成, 郭奇, 张皓露, 陈阔. 两种手术方法对急性阑尾炎患者的临床疗效及对炎性因子的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 447-450.
[9] 高晋鸿, 郝少龙, 刘勇, 翁以炳, 韩威, 王冠, 张腾, 刘鹏, 张磊, 赵鑫宇, 王思诣. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术前应用吲哚美辛栓和氯诺昔康对免疫功能影响的比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 76-79.
[10] 陈金水, 祝晓路, 徐雅萍, 王铁虎, 杨松, 杨卢琦, 谭俊, 郑开福, 李正平. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗有阑尾切除手术史右侧腹股沟疝可行性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 544-550.
[11] 张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.
[12] 吴远涛, 黎峰, 杨斌, 谭嘉男, 钟广宇, 钟林, 周声宁. 单孔对比传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的多中心回顾性分析:一项倾向性评分匹配研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 64-69.
[13] 陶丽莹, 王宏光, 郭享, 郭庆梅. SpyGlass DS辅助内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术的诊治价值(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 625-629.
[14] 李明杰, 王雄. 局部麻醉对腹腔镜阑尾切除术后疼痛的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 266-270.
[15] 刘琳, 段树全, 孟宪梅, 党彤. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术治疗急性非穿孔性阑尾炎疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 18-23.
阅读次数
全文


摘要