切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 323 -327. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.04.009

所属专题: 经自然腔道取标本手术学 文献

论著

结直肠癌NOSE术的近期效果及对机体细胞免疫功能影响的研究
胡俊杰1, 魏少忠1, 熊治国1,(), 杨伯君1   
  1. 1. 430071 武汉,湖北省肿瘤医院胃肠外科;湖北省结直肠癌临床研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-23 出版日期:2016-08-25
  • 通信作者: 熊治国

Effect of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction on short-term outcomes and cellular immunity for colorectal cancer

Junjie Hu1, Shao zhong Wei1, Zhiguo Xiong1,(), Bojun Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Colorectal Cancer Clinical Research Center, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2016-04-23 Published:2016-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhiguo Xiong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xiong Zhiguo, Email:
引用本文:

胡俊杰, 魏少忠, 熊治国, 杨伯君. 结直肠癌NOSE术的近期效果及对机体细胞免疫功能影响的研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(04): 323-327.

Junjie Hu, Shao zhong Wei, Zhiguo Xiong, Bojun Yang. Effect of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction on short-term outcomes and cellular immunity for colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(04): 323-327.

目的

探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌标本经自然腔道取出手术(natural orifice specimen extraction,NOSE)的近期效果及对患者细胞免疫功能的影响。

方法

收集湖北省肿瘤医院2014年9月至2016年3月期间接受腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术的89例患者的临床病理资料,其中标本经肛门取出的腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者31例(NOSE组),传统腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌根治术患者58例(LAP组),比较两组患者手术的近期效果及细胞免疫功能指标变化。

结果

两组患者术前的各临床指标及细胞免疫功能指标相似,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。患者手术时间、手术并发症发生率及淋巴结检出数目两组差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。NOSE组术后疼痛评分(2.8±0.9分)显著少于LAP组(3.7±1.2分),(t=3.766,P<0.001)。NOSE组和LAP组患者术后排气时间分别为2.6±0.8 d和3.3±0.8 d,(t=4.427,P<0.001)。NOSE组患者术后住院时间较LAP组短,两组分别为7.8±4.3 d和10.3±5.4 d,(t=2.213,P=0.030)。NOSE组与LAP组患者术后第3天CD4T细胞与术前相比均有显著下降(均P<0.05),且LAP组术后第3天CD4T细胞比例更低,两组差异有统计学意义(t=4.017,P=0.002)。术后第3天CD8T细胞及CD4 /CD8与术前相比,LAP组下降明显,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),而NOSE组下降不明显(均P>0.05)。两组患者术后CRP水平均显著升高(均P<0.05),且LAP组升高更加明显,两组术后第3天、第6天CRP水平差异均有统计学意义,均P<0.05。

结论

结直肠癌NOSE术与传统腹腔镜辅助手术相比,具有更加优越的微创效果,对患者细胞免疫功能影响更小。

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) on short-term outcomes and cellular immunity for colorectal cancer.

Methods

From September 2014 to March 2016, data of 89 colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic resection were reviewed. All included thirty-one patients underwent laparoscopic resection with NOSE (NOSE group), and fifty-eight patients underwent traditional laparoscopic-assisted resection (LAP group). Short-term outcomes and cellular immunity of the patients in the two groups were compared.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar (P>0.05). The two groups did not differ in operating time, perioperative complications and the number of lymph node harvest (P>0.05). Pain score after operation in the NOSE group (2.8±0.9) was significantly lower than those in the LAP group (3.7±1.2) (t=3.766, P<0.001). Times to first flatus were 2.6±0.8 days and 3.3±0.8 days in NOSE group and LAP group, respectively (t=4.427, P<0.001). Postoperative hospital stay in NOSE group were 7.8±4.3 days and 10.3±5.4 days in LAP group, (t=2.213, P=0.030). CD4+ T cell counts on the 3rd day after operation were significantly lower than those on the day before operation in both groups,and there were significant differences in CD4+ T cell counts on the 3rd day after operation between two groups (t=4.017, P=0.002). CD8+ T cell counts and CD4+ /CD8+ were significantly lower than those on the day before operation in LAP group(P<0.05) but not in NOSE group (P>0.05). CRP level was significantly higher after surgery in both group(P<0.05), and CRP level in the LAP group was significantly higher than that of the NOSE group on the 3rd and the 6th day after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional laparoscopic-assisted resection, NOSE has better effect of minimally invasive and smaller effect on cellular immunity for colorectal cancer.

表1 89例结直肠癌患者的临床病理资料表
图1 NOSE手术标本取出及钉砧头置入关键步骤图:A肛门置入保护套后将标本拖出(方法一);B外翻拖出直肠后,直视下离断肿瘤远端肠管(方法二);C、D采用荷包缝合将吻合器钉砧头固定于近端肠管
表2 NOSE组与LAP组患者的手术结果比较
图2 NOSE组与LAP组患者细胞免疫指标及CRP水平比较,*为同术前相比,P<0.05
[1]
王锡山.结直肠肿瘤类-NOTES术之现状及展望[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 4(4):11-16.
[2]
胡俊杰,周志祥. 直肠癌NOSE手术应用技术及规范[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2015, 30(3):209-213.
[3]
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472):1718-1726.
[4]
Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7):767-774.
[5]
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(14):1324-1332.
[6]
Cahill R, Lindsey I, Cunningham C. NOTES for colorectal neoplasia–surgery through the looking glass[J]. Gut, 2009, 58(8):1168-1169.
[7]
Franklin ME Jr, Liang S, Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A consecu-tive series of 179 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1):127-132.
[8]
Menges P, Kessler W, Kloecker C, et al. Surgical trauma and postoperative immune dysfunction[J]. Eur Surg Res, 2012, 48(4):180-186.
[9]
Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ.Cancer Immunoediting: Integrating Immunity′s Roles in Cancer Suppression and Promotion[J]. Science, 2011, 331(6024):1565-1570.
[10]
Ali AA, McMillan DC, Matalka II, et al.Tumour T-lymphocyte subset infiltration and tumour recurrence following curative resection for colorectal cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004, 30(3):292-295.
[11]
Joosten SA, Ottenhoff TH. Human CD4 and CD8 regulatory T cells in infectious diseases and vaccination[J]. Hum Immunol, 2008, 69(11):760-770.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[13] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要