切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 263 -268. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.03.014

所属专题: 文献

经验交流

腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠D3/CME根治术
邓祥兵1, 孟文建1, 魏明天1, 杨廷翰1, 王存1, 杨烈1, 王自强1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 四川大学华西医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-11 出版日期:2016-06-25
  • 通信作者: 王自强
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81172373)

Unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy

Xiangbing Deng1, Wenjian Meng1, Mingtian Wei1, Tinghan Yang1, Cun Wang1, Lie Yang1, Ziqiang Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of upper GI and Colorectal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan 610000, China
  • Received:2016-03-11 Published:2016-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Ziqiang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Ziqiang, Email:
引用本文:

邓祥兵, 孟文建, 魏明天, 杨廷翰, 王存, 杨烈, 王自强. 腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠D3/CME根治术[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 263-268.

Xiangbing Deng, Wenjian Meng, Mingtian Wei, Tinghan Yang, Cun Wang, Lie Yang, Ziqiang Wang. Unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 263-268.

目的

随着腹腔镜右半结肠D3/CME根治手术逐渐成为发展趋势,为更好克服D3根治术SMV前方淋巴结清扫的困境,本文介绍一种易于操作的往复式推进术式。

方法

该新手术方式具有下列2个特点:自尾侧向头侧多次往复式分离并以胰腺颈部下缘为终点,先于左侧缘显露SMV全长再处理静脉属支。回顾2012~2015年采用本方法的58例患者术中术后指标,评估其安全性及可行性。

结果

2例患者因腹腔粘连中转,余58例患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间164±28.3 min,出血量64±63.5 ml,清扫淋巴结数目28±13.9个,术后无严重并发症及围手术期死亡。

结论

腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠D3/CME根治术时简单、安全且可行的,为解决SMV静脉属支变异带来的手术困难提供了更安全的新的手术入路方式。

Objective

To facilitate laparoscopic D3/CME right hemicolectomy, here we introduce an unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy.

Methods

This novel approach of D3 hemicolectomy is characterized by the following two features: series of repeated unidirctionally preceding dissection along SMV starting caudally and ending at the lower edge of pancreatic neck, and identifying the left 1/3 aspect of the whole length of SMV firstly followed by ligation of individual colonic veins. From Jan 2012 to Dec 2015, 58 patients but 2 underwent this procedure successfully.

Results

The operation time was 164±28.3 min, blood loss was 64±63.5 ml, retrieved lymph nodes were 28±13.9, no mortality and major mobidity were observed.

Conclusions

This novel unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible, with the merit of providing an easier and safer way of managing the frequent variations of tributaries of SMV.

表1 腹腔镜右半结肠根治术患者临床病例资料及手术指标表
图1 腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠癌D3根治术的戳孔位置示意图
图2 手术示意图
[1]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. CME Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4):354-364; discussion 364-365.
[2]
Feng B, Sun J, Ling TL, et al. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with medial access for right-hemi colon cancer: feasibility and technical strategies [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12):3669-3675.
[3]
Fujita J, Uyama I, Sugioka A, et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with radical lymph node dissection using the no-touch isolation technique for advanced colon cancer [J]. Surg Today, 2001, 31(1):93-96.
[4]
Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(7):2288-2294.
[5]
赵丽瑛,李国新,张策,等. 腹腔镜下右半结肠血管解剖及血管并发症分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(4):336-341.
[6]
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(14):1324-1332.
[7]
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(11):1638-1645.
[8]
Sehgal R, Coffey JC. The development of consensus for complete mesocolic excision (CME) should commence with standardisation of anatomy and related terminology [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(6):763-764.
[9]
Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M, et al. Cranial-to-caudal approach for radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy [J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(4):1001.
[10]
Coffey JC, Sehgal R, Culligan K, et al. Terminology and nomenclature in colonic surgery: universal application of a rule-based approach derived from updates on mesenteric anatomy [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(9):789-794.
[11]
Culligan K, Walsh S, Dunne C, et al. The mesocolon: a histological and electron microscopic characterization of the mesenteric attachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization [J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(6):1048-1056.
[12]
Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, et al. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29(4):419-428.
[13]
Yukihide K, Koji K, Kenya K, et al. D3 Lymph Node Dissection in Right Hemicolectomy with a No-touch Isolation Technique in Patients With Colon Cancer [J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2013, 56(7):815-824.
[14]
Merrie A E H, Phillips L V, Yun K, et al. Skip metastases in colon cancer: assessment by lymph node mapping using molecular detection [J]. Surgery, 2001, 129(6):684-691.
[15]
Bertelsen C A, Neuenschwander A U, Jansen J E, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2015, 16(2):161-168.
[16]
Kobayashi H, West N P, Takahashi K, et al. Quality of surgery for stage III colon cancer: comparison between England, Germany, and Japan [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21(3 Supplement):398-404.
[17]
Nesgaard JM, Stimec BV, Bakka AO, et al. Navigating the mesentery: a comparative pre- and per-operative visualization of the vascular anatomy [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2015, 17(9):810-818.
[18]
Yamaguchi S, Kuroyanagi H, Milsom JW, et al. Venous Anatomy of the Right Colon [J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2002, 45(10):1337-1340.
[19]
Ogino T, Takemasa I, Horitsugi G, et al. Preoperative evaluation of venous anatomy in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(Suppl 3):S429-435.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[3] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[4] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[5] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[6] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[15] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
阅读次数
全文


摘要