切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 263 -268. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.03.014

所属专题: 文献

经验交流

腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠D3/CME根治术
邓祥兵1, 孟文建1, 魏明天1, 杨廷翰1, 王存1, 杨烈1, 王自强1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 四川大学华西医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-11 出版日期:2016-06-25
  • 通信作者: 王自强
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81172373)

Unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy

Xiangbing Deng1, Wenjian Meng1, Mingtian Wei1, Tinghan Yang1, Cun Wang1, Lie Yang1, Ziqiang Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of upper GI and Colorectal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan 610000, China
  • Received:2016-03-11 Published:2016-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Ziqiang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Ziqiang, Email:
引用本文:

邓祥兵, 孟文建, 魏明天, 杨廷翰, 王存, 杨烈, 王自强. 腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠D3/CME根治术[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 263-268.

Xiangbing Deng, Wenjian Meng, Mingtian Wei, Tinghan Yang, Cun Wang, Lie Yang, Ziqiang Wang. Unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 263-268.

目的

随着腹腔镜右半结肠D3/CME根治手术逐渐成为发展趋势,为更好克服D3根治术SMV前方淋巴结清扫的困境,本文介绍一种易于操作的往复式推进术式。

方法

该新手术方式具有下列2个特点:自尾侧向头侧多次往复式分离并以胰腺颈部下缘为终点,先于左侧缘显露SMV全长再处理静脉属支。回顾2012~2015年采用本方法的58例患者术中术后指标,评估其安全性及可行性。

结果

2例患者因腹腔粘连中转,余58例患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间164±28.3 min,出血量64±63.5 ml,清扫淋巴结数目28±13.9个,术后无严重并发症及围手术期死亡。

结论

腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠D3/CME根治术时简单、安全且可行的,为解决SMV静脉属支变异带来的手术困难提供了更安全的新的手术入路方式。

Objective

To facilitate laparoscopic D3/CME right hemicolectomy, here we introduce an unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy.

Methods

This novel approach of D3 hemicolectomy is characterized by the following two features: series of repeated unidirctionally preceding dissection along SMV starting caudally and ending at the lower edge of pancreatic neck, and identifying the left 1/3 aspect of the whole length of SMV firstly followed by ligation of individual colonic veins. From Jan 2012 to Dec 2015, 58 patients but 2 underwent this procedure successfully.

Results

The operation time was 164±28.3 min, blood loss was 64±63.5 ml, retrieved lymph nodes were 28±13.9, no mortality and major mobidity were observed.

Conclusions

This novel unidirectionally proceding and pancreas-oriented procedure for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible, with the merit of providing an easier and safer way of managing the frequent variations of tributaries of SMV.

表1 腹腔镜右半结肠根治术患者临床病例资料及手术指标表
图1 腹腔镜下往复式右半结肠癌D3根治术的戳孔位置示意图
图2 手术示意图
[1]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. CME Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4):354-364; discussion 364-365.
[2]
Feng B, Sun J, Ling TL, et al. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with medial access for right-hemi colon cancer: feasibility and technical strategies [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12):3669-3675.
[3]
Fujita J, Uyama I, Sugioka A, et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with radical lymph node dissection using the no-touch isolation technique for advanced colon cancer [J]. Surg Today, 2001, 31(1):93-96.
[4]
Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(7):2288-2294.
[5]
赵丽瑛,李国新,张策,等. 腹腔镜下右半结肠血管解剖及血管并发症分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(4):336-341.
[6]
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(14):1324-1332.
[7]
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(11):1638-1645.
[8]
Sehgal R, Coffey JC. The development of consensus for complete mesocolic excision (CME) should commence with standardisation of anatomy and related terminology [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(6):763-764.
[9]
Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M, et al. Cranial-to-caudal approach for radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy [J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(4):1001.
[10]
Coffey JC, Sehgal R, Culligan K, et al. Terminology and nomenclature in colonic surgery: universal application of a rule-based approach derived from updates on mesenteric anatomy [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(9):789-794.
[11]
Culligan K, Walsh S, Dunne C, et al. The mesocolon: a histological and electron microscopic characterization of the mesenteric attachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization [J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(6):1048-1056.
[12]
Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, et al. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29(4):419-428.
[13]
Yukihide K, Koji K, Kenya K, et al. D3 Lymph Node Dissection in Right Hemicolectomy with a No-touch Isolation Technique in Patients With Colon Cancer [J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2013, 56(7):815-824.
[14]
Merrie A E H, Phillips L V, Yun K, et al. Skip metastases in colon cancer: assessment by lymph node mapping using molecular detection [J]. Surgery, 2001, 129(6):684-691.
[15]
Bertelsen C A, Neuenschwander A U, Jansen J E, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2015, 16(2):161-168.
[16]
Kobayashi H, West N P, Takahashi K, et al. Quality of surgery for stage III colon cancer: comparison between England, Germany, and Japan [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21(3 Supplement):398-404.
[17]
Nesgaard JM, Stimec BV, Bakka AO, et al. Navigating the mesentery: a comparative pre- and per-operative visualization of the vascular anatomy [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2015, 17(9):810-818.
[18]
Yamaguchi S, Kuroyanagi H, Milsom JW, et al. Venous Anatomy of the Right Colon [J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2002, 45(10):1337-1340.
[19]
Ogino T, Takemasa I, Horitsugi G, et al. Preoperative evaluation of venous anatomy in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014, 21(Suppl 3):S429-435.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?