切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 56 -60. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2012.02.01

所属专题: 文献

述评

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections:the preferred option
Larry Sasaki1,()   
  1. 1. 71111 Bossier City,Louisiana,USA.General,Colorectal,and Laparoscopic Surgery North Louisiana Surgery Center 1512 Doctors Drive
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-25 出版日期:2012-12-25
  • 通信作者: Larry Sasaki

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections: the preferred option

Larry Sasaki1,()   

  1. 1. General, Colorectal, and Laparoscopic Surgery - North Louisiana Surgery Center1512 Doctors Drive Bossier City, Louisiana71111, USA
  • Received:2012-10-25 Published:2012-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Larry Sasaki
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Larry Sasaki, Email:
引用本文:

Larry Sasaki. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections:the preferred option[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2012, 01(02): 56-60.

Larry Sasaki. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections: the preferred option[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2012, 01(02): 56-60.

作者对1995年至2009年间该院的微创结直肠手术进行了总结和综述,2002年后,作者开始实施手辅助下腔镜结直肠手术。在这14年间,一共实施了155例开腹手术,225例全腔镜手术和504例手辅助腔镜结肠手术。全腔镜组和手辅助组总的手术并发症发生率是2.9%,其中全腔镜组为5.3%,手辅助组为1.8%。吻合口瘘发生率在开腹组、全腔镜组和手辅助组分别为1.9%(3/155)、1.3%(3/225)和1.3%(7/504)。开腹组、全腔镜组和手辅助组的平均住院天数分别为6.4 d、3.1 d和2.9 d。腔镜组住院时间的缩短抵消了手术费用的增加,腔镜组的总费用明显少于开腹组(平均节省5053美元)。得益于手术时间的缩短和较少的器械费用,手辅助组的成本效益(7334美元)甚至优于全腔镜组(4215美元)。结果显示微创手术在并发症发生率、住院时间和总费用方面优于开腹手术,而且与开腹手术相比,手辅助下腔镜手术不仅具有腹腔镜手术的先天优势,而且手术时间更短,费用更少。

This review summarizes the author′s series in minimally-invasivecolorectal procedures from 1995 to 2009.The author had transitioned from performing laparoscopic-assisted (LAC) to hand-assisted (HALC) colectomies in 2002.Over this fourteen-year period, the distribution of the types of colorectal procedures were as follows: 155 open, 225 laparoscopic-assisted, and 504 hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomies.Rate of overall complication was 2.9% for the laparoscopic colectomy group (5.3% for LAC; 1.8% for HALC); and 9.6% for open colectomy.Motic leak rate of 1.9% (3/155) for open; 1.3% (3/255) for LAC; and 1.3% (7/504) for HALC.Average length of hospital stay was 3.1 days for LAC and 2.9 days for HALC.Average length of hospital stay for open colectomy was 6.4 days.The shortened stay for the laparoscopic colectomy group offset the increased cost of operation.Final cost analysis showed a significant benefit of the laparoscopic colectomy group as compared to open (average savings of $5 053 USD ). The final cost-benefit was even greater for HALC ( $7 334 USD ) over LAC ($4 215 USD), resulting from HALC′s shorter operatin gtimes and lower surgical equipment costs.These results suggest that minimally-invasivecolorectal procedures as compared to open have fewer complications, shorter length of stay, and lower overall cost.In addition, these results show that HALC retains all benefits of LAC procedures as compared to open; and less operating time and reduced costs when compared directly to LAC.

Figure 1. LAC "Sasaki Diamond"
Figure 2. HALS "Sasaki Diamond"
Figure 3. HALS Right Colectomy
Figure 4. HALS transverse Colectomy
Figure 5. HALS Left/ LAR colectomy
Figure 6. HALS Hartmann's Reversal
Figure 7. HALS Total Colectomy
Figure 8. HALS Total Proctocolectomy with IPAA
[1]
Rawlings AL,Woodland JH,Vegunta RK, et al.Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.Surg Endo, 2007, 21(10): 1701-1708.
[2]
Roslani AC,Koh DC,Tsang CB, et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy versus standard aparoscopic colectomy: a cost analysis.Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(5): 496-501.
[3]
Schwenk W,Böhm B,Haase O, et al.Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomized study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding.Arch Surg, 1998, 383(1): 49-55.
[4]
Braga M,Vignali A,Gianotti L, et al.Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term out-come.Ann Surg, 2002, 236(6): 759-767.
[5]
Phillips EH,Franklin M,Carroll BJ, et al.Laparoscopic colectomy.Ann Surg, 1992, 216(6): 703-707.
[6]
Sonoda T,Pandey S,Trencheva K, et al.Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy.Am Col Surg, 2009, 208(1): 62-67.
[7]
HALS Study Group.Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease .Surg Endosc, 2000, 14(10): 896-901.
[8]
Yin WY,Wei CK,Tseng KC, et al.Open colectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted colectomy supported by hand-assisted colectomy for resectable colorectal cancer.Hepatogastroenterology, 2009, 56(93): 998-1006.
[9]
Kang JC,Chung MH,Chao PC, et al.Hand-access versus laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter prospective randomized study.Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(4): 577-581.
[10]
Maartense S,Dunker MS,Slors JF, et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anastomosis.Ann Surg, 2004, 240(6): 984-992.
[11]
Targarona EM,Gracia E,Garriga J, et al.Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, Im-mediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(2): 234-239.
[12]
Ringley C,Lee YK,Iqbal A, et al.Comparison of conventionaland laparoscopic and hand-assisted oncologic segmental colonic resection.Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(12): 2137-2141.
[13]
Nakajima K,Lee SW,Cocilovo C, et al.Laparoscopic total colectomy:hand-assisted versus standard technique.Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(4): 582-586.
[1] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 余新水, 沈佳宇, 巨积辉. 皮瓣联合掌长肌腱折叠单排三点式固定治疗指背侧创面伴锤状指畸形的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 485-490.
[2] 刘敏, 唐恩溢, 刘喆, 葛苏蒙, 刘梅, 孙国文. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面部微小异物取出手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 375-379.
[3] 罗青杉, 梅海涛, 郝家领, 蔡锦锋, 周润楷, 温玉刚. 连接蛋白43通过调控细胞周期抑制结直肠癌的增殖机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 344-349.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[6] 赵毅, 李昶田, 唐文博, 白雪婷, 刘荣. 腹腔镜术中超声主胰管自动识别模型的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 290-294.
[7] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[8] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[14] 任佳琪, 刁德昌, 何自衍, 张雪阳, 唐新, 李文娟, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江. 网膜融合线导向的脾曲游离技术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 362-367.
[15] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?