切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 56 -60. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2012.02.01

所属专题: 文献

述评

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections:the preferred option
Larry Sasaki1,()   
  1. 1. 71111 Bossier City,Louisiana,USA.General,Colorectal,and Laparoscopic Surgery North Louisiana Surgery Center 1512 Doctors Drive
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-25 出版日期:2012-12-25
  • 通信作者: Larry Sasaki

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections: the preferred option

Larry Sasaki1,()   

  1. 1. General, Colorectal, and Laparoscopic Surgery - North Louisiana Surgery Center1512 Doctors Drive Bossier City, Louisiana71111, USA
  • Received:2012-10-25 Published:2012-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Larry Sasaki
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Larry Sasaki, Email:
引用本文:

Larry Sasaki. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections:the preferred option[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2012, 01(02): 56-60.

Larry Sasaki. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections: the preferred option[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2012, 01(02): 56-60.

作者对1995年至2009年间该院的微创结直肠手术进行了总结和综述,2002年后,作者开始实施手辅助下腔镜结直肠手术。在这14年间,一共实施了155例开腹手术,225例全腔镜手术和504例手辅助腔镜结肠手术。全腔镜组和手辅助组总的手术并发症发生率是2.9%,其中全腔镜组为5.3%,手辅助组为1.8%。吻合口瘘发生率在开腹组、全腔镜组和手辅助组分别为1.9%(3/155)、1.3%(3/225)和1.3%(7/504)。开腹组、全腔镜组和手辅助组的平均住院天数分别为6.4 d、3.1 d和2.9 d。腔镜组住院时间的缩短抵消了手术费用的增加,腔镜组的总费用明显少于开腹组(平均节省5053美元)。得益于手术时间的缩短和较少的器械费用,手辅助组的成本效益(7334美元)甚至优于全腔镜组(4215美元)。结果显示微创手术在并发症发生率、住院时间和总费用方面优于开腹手术,而且与开腹手术相比,手辅助下腔镜手术不仅具有腹腔镜手术的先天优势,而且手术时间更短,费用更少。

This review summarizes the author′s series in minimally-invasivecolorectal procedures from 1995 to 2009.The author had transitioned from performing laparoscopic-assisted (LAC) to hand-assisted (HALC) colectomies in 2002.Over this fourteen-year period, the distribution of the types of colorectal procedures were as follows: 155 open, 225 laparoscopic-assisted, and 504 hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomies.Rate of overall complication was 2.9% for the laparoscopic colectomy group (5.3% for LAC; 1.8% for HALC); and 9.6% for open colectomy.Motic leak rate of 1.9% (3/155) for open; 1.3% (3/255) for LAC; and 1.3% (7/504) for HALC.Average length of hospital stay was 3.1 days for LAC and 2.9 days for HALC.Average length of hospital stay for open colectomy was 6.4 days.The shortened stay for the laparoscopic colectomy group offset the increased cost of operation.Final cost analysis showed a significant benefit of the laparoscopic colectomy group as compared to open (average savings of $5 053 USD ). The final cost-benefit was even greater for HALC ( $7 334 USD ) over LAC ($4 215 USD), resulting from HALC′s shorter operatin gtimes and lower surgical equipment costs.These results suggest that minimally-invasivecolorectal procedures as compared to open have fewer complications, shorter length of stay, and lower overall cost.In addition, these results show that HALC retains all benefits of LAC procedures as compared to open; and less operating time and reduced costs when compared directly to LAC.

Figure 1. LAC "Sasaki Diamond"
Figure 2. HALS "Sasaki Diamond"
Figure 3. HALS Right Colectomy
Figure 4. HALS transverse Colectomy
Figure 5. HALS Left/ LAR colectomy
Figure 6. HALS Hartmann's Reversal
Figure 7. HALS Total Colectomy
Figure 8. HALS Total Proctocolectomy with IPAA
[1]
Rawlings AL,Woodland JH,Vegunta RK, et al.Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.Surg Endo, 2007, 21(10): 1701-1708.
[2]
Roslani AC,Koh DC,Tsang CB, et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy versus standard aparoscopic colectomy: a cost analysis.Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(5): 496-501.
[3]
Schwenk W,Böhm B,Haase O, et al.Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomized study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding.Arch Surg, 1998, 383(1): 49-55.
[4]
Braga M,Vignali A,Gianotti L, et al.Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term out-come.Ann Surg, 2002, 236(6): 759-767.
[5]
Phillips EH,Franklin M,Carroll BJ, et al.Laparoscopic colectomy.Ann Surg, 1992, 216(6): 703-707.
[6]
Sonoda T,Pandey S,Trencheva K, et al.Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy.Am Col Surg, 2009, 208(1): 62-67.
[7]
HALS Study Group.Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease .Surg Endosc, 2000, 14(10): 896-901.
[8]
Yin WY,Wei CK,Tseng KC, et al.Open colectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted colectomy supported by hand-assisted colectomy for resectable colorectal cancer.Hepatogastroenterology, 2009, 56(93): 998-1006.
[9]
Kang JC,Chung MH,Chao PC, et al.Hand-access versus laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter prospective randomized study.Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(4): 577-581.
[10]
Maartense S,Dunker MS,Slors JF, et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anastomosis.Ann Surg, 2004, 240(6): 984-992.
[11]
Targarona EM,Gracia E,Garriga J, et al.Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, Im-mediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(2): 234-239.
[12]
Ringley C,Lee YK,Iqbal A, et al.Comparison of conventionaland laparoscopic and hand-assisted oncologic segmental colonic resection.Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(12): 2137-2141.
[13]
Nakajima K,Lee SW,Cocilovo C, et al.Laparoscopic total colectomy:hand-assisted versus standard technique.Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(4): 582-586.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[3] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[4] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[5] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[6] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[9] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[10] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[11] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[12] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[13] 李晓东, 魏云. 冠状切口额下入路治疗前颅窝巨大脑膜瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 318-319.
[14] 孙昕, 程海波, 沈卫星. 基于全转录组学探讨仙连解毒方治疗Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的疗效机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-283.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要