Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05): 480-485. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.05.008

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer

Xiaolong Zhu1, Peijing Yan2, Liang Yao2, Yulong Wang3, Wenhan Liu4, Binbin Du3, Kehu Yang2, Tiankang Guo5,(), Xiongfei Yang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China;Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
    2. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China;Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
    3. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
    4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China; Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
    5. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic sphincterotomy for low rectal cancer and to investigate the safety and feasibility of robotic sphincterotomy.

Methods

The characteristics of patients underwent robot-assisted or laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer were retrospectively collected from October 2015 to October 2017 in Gansu Provincial Hospital. Compared the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative laparotomy, first ventilation time, postoperative hospital stays, complications, distance from the distant margin of the tumor, number of positive circumferential resection margins, number of lymph nodes removed, and other outcoms between two groups.

Results

The liquid diet time, first ventilation time and postoperative hospital stays of the robot group were shorter than the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the robot group was more than the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). There were no significant difference between two groups in postoperative complications or operation time. The total cost of the robotic group was higher than the laparoscopic group (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Robotic sphincterotomy for low rectal cancer is safe and feasible. Compared with laparoscopic surgery, the robotic surgery had rapider recovery of bowel function, shorter hospital stays, and more reliable short-term efficacy in oncology. Robotic sphincterotomy may be an effective treatment for the low rectal cancer.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Robotic surgery, Laparoscopy surgery, Intersphincteric resection

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd