Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04): 362-367. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.04.011

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of NOSES operation in the treatment of rectal cancer with ERAS

Qingchao Tang1, Guiyu Wang1, Yinggang Chen1, Zheng Liu2, Qian Zhang1, Hanqing Hu1, Zhixun Zhao1, Song Wang1, Runkun Yang1, Xishan Wang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China; Institute of Colorectal Cancer of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin 150086, China
    2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
    3. Institute of Colorectal Cancer of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin 150086, China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2018-07-07 Online:2018-08-25 Published:2018-08-25
  • Contact: Xishan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xishan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To study the clinical effect of the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) surgical treatment of rectal cancer with the concept of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Methods

Twenty-five cases of NOSES radical resection of rectal cancer patients under the guidance of the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery in our hospital were selected as research subjects (NOSES-ERAS group). We selected 30 cases patients with radical resection of rectal by laparoscopic surgery under the guidance of traditional concept as control group.We evaluated the operation time, blood loss, length of incision, the number of lymph node dissection and wound complications and lower extremity venous embolism and hypostatic pneumonia incidence rate of postoperative complications. NRS method was used to evaluate postoperative pain by SPSS13.0 statistical analysis software.

Results

There were no statistical differences between the NOSES-ERAS group and control goup in comparison with the number of lymph node dissection, operation time, blood loss, postoperative anastomotic leakage and other aspects. The total incidence rate of incision related complications in NOSES-ERAS group was lower than that of control group (χ2=4.101, P<0.05); the incidence of NOSES-ERAS patients after leaving bed time, and hospitalization time were shorter than the control group (χ2=-11.179, -3.434, P<0.05); incision length of NOSES-ERAS group were shorter than the control group (t=-42.798, P<0.01), postoperative pain NRS score of NOSES-ERAS group were lighter than the control group (t=-26.525, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The NOSES radical resection of rectal cancer under the guidance of ERAS achieved more minimally invasive cosmetic and functional, individualized treatment effect in laparoscopic surgery. There is a greater advantage that ERAS combined with the NOSES radical resection of rectal cancer which is worthy of popularization and with good application prospect.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery, NOSES, Enhanced recovery after surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd