Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (05): 377-380. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2017.05.005

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison study of laparoscopic (LAP) surgery vs. open surgery (OS) for descending colon cancer

Jinhua Tao1, Qian Liu1,(), Zheng Liu1, Wei Pei1, Zheng Jiang1, Chunguang Guo2, Jianan Chen1, Yafei Leng3   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
    2. Department of Pancreatic Stomach Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Sinan People′s Hospital, Guizhou 565100, China
  • Received:2017-03-19 Online:2017-10-25 Published:2017-10-25
  • Contact: Qian Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Qian, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate short-time outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery (OS) for left-sided colon cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 144 patients who received LAP or OS left hemicolectomy in Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College from January 2010 to March 2016 were collected and analyzed. These patients were divided into LAP group (n=66) and OS group (n=78). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of dissected lymph nodes and short-time outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results

There was a significant difference in operating time between the LAP group (151.36±26.98) min and the OS group (190.30±15.30) min (t=-5.130, P=0.0014). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the LAP group (75±29.92) ml and the OS group (76.87±24.59) ml (t=-0.836, P=0.4613). There was a significant difference in length of surgical incision between the LAP group (6.88±3.00) cm and the OS group (15.57±2.22) cm (t=-28.484, P<0.001).There was no significant difference in number of swollen lymph nodes between the LAP group (21.58±8.57) and the OS group (23.82±10.96) (t=-0.283, P=0.2670). The average postoperative evacuation time (P=0.0015), getting out-of-bed time (P=0.0009), time to eat food (P=0.0018) were shorter in LAP group than in OS group.The hospital stays were shorter in LAP group than in OS group (t=-3.762, P=0.0364). there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in postoperative complications (P=0.333).

Conclusions

LAP for left sided colon cancer is safe and reliable. Compared to the OS group, LAP has advantages including less surgery time, smaller surgical incision, faster recovery and shorter hospital stays.

Key words: Colorectal neoplasms, Laparoscopes, Surgical procedures, minimally invasive, Laparotomy

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd