Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05): 462-469. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.05.003

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the short-term clinical efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer

Yao Yang1, Zhuqing Zhou1, Bing Lu1, Zhe Zhu1, Qixing Jiang1, Fang Ji1, Chuan'gang Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-29
  • Contact: Chuan'gang Fu

Abstract:

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES) of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological features of 80 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer during January 2018 to December 2020 in Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery Department of Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University. All patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: thirty-four cases were divided into the NOSES group who underwent natural orifice specimen extraction surgery of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection. Fourty-six cases were divided into traditional group who underwent traditional approach of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection. A comparative, retrospective analysis was performed between the two groups in operative safety index and efficacy.

Results

Age, gender, body mass index, tumor location, diameter of tumor, tumor stage were not significantly different between the two groups(P>0.05); As compared to the traditional group, there were no significant difference between two groups in terms of blood loss(t=0.192, P=0.848), operation time(t=1.527, P=0.131), postoperative complications(χ2=1.368, P=0.850), first anal exhaust time(t=1.126, P=0.263), postoperative eating liquid time(t=0.863, P=0.391) and postoperative pathology features(χ2=0.224, P=0.894). NOSES group was associated with significantly less estimated mean postoperative hospitalization time [(9.97±2.58) days vs.(12.28±3.80) days, t=3.064; P=0.003]. The VAS score of the incision pain of the first to third day after operation in group NOSES was significantly lower than that in traditional group (postoperative 1d: t=3.586, P=0.001; postoperative 2d: t=2.942, P=0.004; postoperative 3d: t=2.792, P=0.007). According to WIS criteria, there were 76.6% patients whose anal sphincter function was good (WIS≤10), and there was no patient with serious anal incontinence.

Conclusion

By using both two surgical methods, radical resection of tumors could be achieved effectively in accordance with the principles of TME, and the operative effect was comparable. NOSES of 3D laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection for low rectal cancer has advantages in less estimated postoperative incision pain and postoperative hospitalization time, it is a safe and reliable treatment.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Natural orifice endoscopic surgery, Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES), Laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection, Transanal specimen extraction surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd