切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 221 -227. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2023.03.008

综述

腹腔镜右半结肠切除应用现状
路继永, 王帅, 张成仁, 吴德望, 杨熊飞()   
  1. 730000 兰州,甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院
    750004 银川,宁夏医科大学临床医学院
    730000 兰州,甘肃省人民医院肛肠科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-24 出版日期:2023-06-25
  • 通信作者: 杨熊飞
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省人民医院院内青年项目(21GSSYC-23)

Application status of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

jiyong Lu, Shuai Wang, Chengren Zhang, Dewang Wu, Xiongfei Yang()   

  1. The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
    Clinical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
    Department of Colorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2022-03-24 Published:2023-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiongfei Yang
引用本文:

路继永, 王帅, 张成仁, 吴德望, 杨熊飞. 腹腔镜右半结肠切除应用现状[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 221-227.

jiyong Lu, Shuai Wang, Chengren Zhang, Dewang Wu, Xiongfei Yang. Application status of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 221-227.

右半结肠切除是目前治疗右半结肠癌最主要也是有效的方法,随着外科技术的发展,右半结肠切除也迎来了许多新的手术方式和挑战,从开腹手术到腹腔镜手术,微创外科受到了外科医生重点学习和关注。目前越来越多的患者从微创手术中获益也引起了结直肠外科医生对右半结肠切除的微创技术进行新的挑战。从原来的常规五孔腹腔镜到三孔腹腔镜的探索和单孔腹腔镜的创新也引发了更多的关注和争议。而机器人的应用代表外科技术的又一大进步,机器人手术对于患者术后早期恢复和获得淋巴结数目优于腹腔镜手术,但机器人手术是否会为患者带来远期获益则是现阶段主要的研究目标。除此之外目前对于右半结肠切除形成的统一理念是全结肠系膜切除(CME),而是否还需进行D3淋巴结清扫则是讨论的热点话题;右半结肠切除术后回结肠吻合亦成为目前关注的问题,体内吻合和体外吻合尚未形成统一意见其主要关注点在于腹腔感染的发生情况,本文将就右半结肠切除研究过程中存在的热点话题和争议做一综述。

Right hemicolectomy is currently the most important and effective method for the treatment of right hemicolectomy. With the development of surgical technology, right hemicolectomy has also ushered in many new surgical methods and challenges. From open surgery to laparoscopic surgery, minimally invasive surgery has attracted the attention of surgeons. At present, more and more patients benefit from minimally invasive surgery, which also motivates colorectal surgeons to take on new challenges with minimally invasive techniques for right hemicolectomy. The exploration from conventional five-hole laparoscopy to three-hole laparoscopy and the innovation of single-hole laparoscopy have also aroused more attention and controversy. However, the application of robot represents another great progress in surgical technology. Robotic surgery is better than laparoscopic surgery for early postoperative recovery and the number of lymph nodes obtained. However, whether robotic surgery can bring long-term benefits to patients is the main research goal of surgeons. In addition, the current unified idea for right hemicolectomy is total mesocolectomy and whether D3 lymph node dissection is a hot topic of discussion. Ileocolon anastomosis after right hemicolectomy has also become a problem of current concern. No consensus has been reached between in vivo anastomosis and in vitro anastomosis, and the main concern is the occurrence of abdominal infection. This paper will review the hot topics and controversies in the study of right hemicolectomy.

[1]
Raskov H, Pommergaard HC, Burcharth J, et al. Colorectal carcinogenesis--update and perspectives [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(48): 18151-18164.
[2]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
[3]
郑荣寿, 孙可欣, 张思维, 等. 2015年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2019, 41(1): 19-28.
[4]
Lee GH, Malietzis G, Askari A, et al. Is right-sided colon cancer different to left-sided colorectal cancer? - a systematic review [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015, 41(3): 300-308.
[5]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(3): 177-193.
[6]
Hanna MH, Hwang GS, Phelan MJ, et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis [J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(9): 3933-3942.
[7]
Bai HL, Chen B, Zhou Y, et al. Five-year long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(39): 4992-4997.
[8]
Magouliotis DE, Baloyiannis I, Mamaloudis I, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right colectomy for cancer in the era of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation: pathology and short-term outcomes [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2021, 31(11): 1303-1308.
[9]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4): 354-364; discussion 64-65.
[10]
Di Buono G, Buscemi S, Cocorullo G, et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer: short-term outcomes. a randomized clinical study [J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(1): 57-62.
[11]
Shin JY. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience[J]. J Korean Soc Coloproctol, 2012, 28(1): 19-26.
[12]
Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, et al. Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience [J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(5): 1409-1414.
[13]
Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J, et al. Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve [J]. Surg Oncol, 2017, 26(1): 28-36.
[14]
郑民华, 马君俊. 腹腔镜结直肠手术手术入路选择专家共识 [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(4): 415-419.
[15]
Balciscueta Z, Balciscueta I, Uribe N, et al. D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(7): 1541-1551.
[16]
Liu S, Li L, Sun H, et al. D3 Versus D2 lymphadenectomy in right hemicolectomy: A systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Surg Innov, 2022, 29(3): 416-425.
[17]
周毅, 韩振魁. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术31例临床分析 [J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版). 2014, 7(5): 358-360.
[18]
苏洋, 吴硕东, 孔静, 等. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术6例[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2012, 15(12): 994-996.
[19]
Dong B, Luo Z, Lu J, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right colectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Surg (London, England), 2018, 55: 31-38.
[20]
施翼. 利用倾向性评分匹配比较三孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术短期及长期疗效 [D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2019.
[21]
Zhang T, Zhang Y, Shen X, et al. Longterm outcomes of three-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy versus five-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study [J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 762716.
[22]
Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Lazzara S, et al. Single-incision versus three-port conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: is there any real need to go single? [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2012, 22(7): 621-624.
[23]
张安平, 刘宝华. 腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的手术入路及注意事项[J]. 临床外科杂志. 2021, 29(5): 412-414.
[24]
申占龙, 叶颖江. 中国腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术20年术式演变与发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版). 2021, 15(5): 482-485.
[25]
Petz W, Borin S, Fumagalli Romario U. Updates on robotic CME for right colon cancer: a qualitative systematic review [J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(6): 550.
[26]
谢忠士, 李春生, 房学东. 腹腔镜右半结肠切除术外侧入路"互"字形游离技术的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(5): 587-588.
[27]
Takii Y, Shimada Y, Moriya Y, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the conventional technique versus the no-touch isolation technique for primary tumor resection in patients with colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1006 [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2014, 44(1): 97-100.
[28]
Takii Y, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al. The conventional technique versus the no-touch isolation technique for primary tumor resection in patients with colon cancer (JCOG1006): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III trial [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2022, 275(5): 849-855.
[29]
张俊立, 韩广森, 马鹏飞, 等. 腹腔镜辅助下"回"字型根治性右半结肠切除术的应用[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2019, 48(2): 246-248.
[30]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(8): 561-585.
[31]
李嘉, 曹锋, 李昂, 等. 术前CT无淋巴结转移的右半结肠癌D3手术198例报告 [J].中国医刊, 2017, 52(8): 42-46.
[32]
黄龙昌, 王彤. 右半结肠切除术在右半结肠癌治疗中的应用研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(12): 107-110.
[33]
郑民华, 何子锐. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的热点与未来发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版). 2019, 13(5): 433-436.
[34]
张森, 冯波, 马君俊, 等. "翻页式"完全中间入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(12): 1026-1030.
[35]
邹瞭南, 郑蓓诗, 卢新泉, 等. 腹腔镜尾侧入路法根治性右半结肠切除术[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 6(2): 170-173.
[36]
李世森, 杜昆利, 肖书傲, 等. 腹腔镜右半结肠切除尾侧入路与中间入路的临床随机对照研究[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2020, 29(4): 383-390.
[37]
郑民华. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌CME切除术——尾侧中间联合入路 [J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 198.
[38]
陈庆永, 帅晓明, 陈立波. 中间尾侧联合入路行腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫加完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌合并不全性肠梗阻的安全性和可行性[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(9): 1039-1044.
[39]
鲍新民, 王日玮, 张开华, 等. 腹腔镜下头尾侧联合入路治疗右半结肠癌的疗效分析 [J].肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(11): 856-860.
[40]
王庆, 胡茂, 李腾腾, 等. 头尾联合入路和内侧入路在腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术中的对比研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(14): 717-722.
[41]
Yu ZZ, Han GS, Ren YK, et al. Clinical research of superior mesenteric vascular intrathecal approach in right hemicolectomy [J]. Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010, 9(11): 633-636.
[42]
Ito K, Blasbalg R, Hussain SM, et al. Portal vein and its tributaries: evaluation with thin-section three-dimensional contrast-enhanced dynamic fat-suppressed MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 2000, 215(2): 381-386.
[43]
Yi XJ, Lu XQ, Li HM, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision using an 'artery-first' approach [J]. Gastroenterol Rep, 2019, 7(3): 199-204.
[44]
张想想. 开腹与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中两种吻合方式的回顾性研究 [D]. 海口: 海南医学院, 2020.
[45]
Ibáñez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, et al. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI) [J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(9): 2850-2857.
[46]
Ibañez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, et al. Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017, 32(9): 1349-1356.
[47]
Biondi A, Santocchi P, Pennestrì F, et al. Totally laparoscopic right colectomy versus laparoscopically assisted right colectomy: a propensity score analysis [J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(12): 5275-5282.
[48]
Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA, et al. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial [J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 270(5): 762-767.
[49]
Aiolfi A, Bona D, Guerrazzi G, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(4): 402-412.
[50]
Bergamaschi R, Schochet E, Haughn C, et al. Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(9): 1350-1355.
[51]
Mari GM, Crippa J, Costanzi ATM, et al. Intracorporeal anastomosis reduces surgical stress response in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective randomized trial [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2018, 28(2): 77-81.
[52]
Ferrer-Márquez M, Rubio-Gil F, Torres-Fernández R, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (The IVEA-study) [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2021, 31(4): 408-413.
[53]
Ishizaki T, Katsumata K, Enomoto M, et al. Comparison of intra-abdominal infection risk between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a single-center retrospective study [J]. Am Surg, 2021, 87(3): 341-346.
[54]
唐孝良, 王亚儒, 姚远. 腹腔内吻合与腹腔外吻合对腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后腹腔感染的影响[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2021, 23(4): 620-622.
[55]
罗寿, 苏昊, 包满都拉, 等. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的学习曲线分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(11): 809-812+829.
[56]
张辉敏. 完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的效果[J]. 现代养生, 2018, (1): 110-111.
[57]
王锡山. 结肠直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术适应证选择的规范与共识[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(5): 394-397.
[58]
Saad S, Schmischke D, Martin C, et al. Hybrid laparoscopic colectomy with transluminal colonoscopic specimen extraction--a step toward natural orifice surgery [J]. Endosc, 2010, 42 (Suppl. 2): E346-347.
[59]
Christoforidis D, Clerc D, Demartines N. Transrectal specimen extraction after laparoscopic left colectomy: a case-matched study [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15(3): 347-353.
[60]
Kayaalp C, Yagci MA. Laparoscopic right colon resection with transvaginal extraction: a systematic review of 90 cases [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, 25(5): 384-391.
[61]
Costantino FA, Diana M, Wall J, et al. Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(6): 1495-1500.
[62]
王锡山. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术专家共识(2019版) [J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 8(4): 336-342.
[63]
王玉柳明, 张骞, 郁雷, 等. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术203例回顾性研究[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 8(1): 32-37.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[12] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[13] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[14] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要