切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 226 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2022.03.007

论著

高分辨肛门直肠测压对直肠癌术后临时造口还纳的评估作用
张大奎1, 陈少轩1, 侯智勇1, 孙白龙1, 姚力1, 武文晓1, 曲瑞新1, 介建政1,()   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,中日友好医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-30 出版日期:2022-06-25
  • 通信作者: 介建政
  • 基金资助:
    青海省科技厅应用基础研究计划(2015-ZJ-742); 中日友好医院青年课题(2019-1-QN-42)

Evaluation of high-resolution anorectal manometry on closure of temporary ileostomy for rectal cancer patients

Dakui Zhang1, Shaoxuan Chen1, Zhiyong Hou1, Bailong Sun1, Li Yao1, Wenxiao Wu1, Ruixin Qu1, Jianzheng Jie1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2021-11-30 Published:2022-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Jianzheng Jie
引用本文:

张大奎, 陈少轩, 侯智勇, 孙白龙, 姚力, 武文晓, 曲瑞新, 介建政. 高分辨肛门直肠测压对直肠癌术后临时造口还纳的评估作用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 226-231.

Dakui Zhang, Shaoxuan Chen, Zhiyong Hou, Bailong Sun, Li Yao, Wenxiao Wu, Ruixin Qu, Jianzheng Jie. Evaluation of high-resolution anorectal manometry on closure of temporary ileostomy for rectal cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(03): 226-231.

目的

评估高分辨肛门直肠测压检查能否客观反映直肠癌术后的肛门功能,能否成为临时造口还纳的依据。

方法

选取2017年4月至2020年4月期间在中日友好医院普外科接受手术的170例直肠癌患者作为研究对象。将患者按照造口还纳后的前切除综合征评分分为无前切除综合征,轻度前切除综合征和重度前切除综合征3类。重度前切除综合征患者不适合造口还纳,据此将患者分为适合还纳组(141例)和不适合还纳组(29例),适合还纳组包括无前切除综合征(75例)和轻度前切除综合征(66例)。患者均为临时性回肠造口,均在术后6个月时进行肛门直肠测压检查。肛门测压的各项结果在不同分组间进行Logistic回归分析。

结果

有前切除综合征组患者的最大缩榨压明显更低(P=0.032,OR=1.033),排便的最大耐受量也明显更小(P=0.011,OR=1.036)。不适合还纳组的静息压(P=0.002,OR=1.135)和最大缩榨压(P=0.001,OR=1.058)明显更低,排便感觉阈(P=0.049,OR=1.087)和最大耐受量(P=0.001,OR=1.059)也明显更小。

结论

肛门直肠测压能够预测肛门功能的下降,可以作为临时造口是否应还纳的依据。

Objective

To evaluate whether the high-resolution anorectal manometry is associated with anal function after rectal surgery and can become a predictive method before the closure of temporary ileostomy.

Methods

170 patients with rectal cancer underwent surgery at Department of General Surgery in China-Japan Friendship Hospital between April 2017 and April 2020. Patients were classified as no low anterior resection syndrome(LARS), mild LARS, and severe LARS. According to the postoperative anal function, it was divided into two groups: no LARS group (n=75) and LARS group (n=95). According to the quality of life after closure of ileostomy, it is also divided into two groups: appropriate closure group (n=141) and inappropriate closure group (n=29). Anorectal manometry was carried out at 6 months after surgery and followed with the closure of temporary ileostomy. The results were analyzed by logistic regression between different groups.

Results

The maximal compressive pressure (P=0.032, OR=1.033) and maximal tolerant dose of defecation (P=0.011, OR=1.036) were both significantly lower in LARS group. Meanwhile, in inappropriate closure group, anal resting pressure (P=0.002, OR=1.135) and maximal compressive pressure (P=0.001, OR=1.058) were significantly lower than the other patients. The decrease of defecate sensory threshold (P=0.049, OR=1.087) and maximal tolerance dose (P=0.001, OR=1.059) were also significant.

Conclusion

Anorectal manometry can predict decreased anal function. It should be a useful evaluation method before the closure of temporary ileostomy.

表1 3类症状不同的患者临床病理资料比较(例)
表2 无前切除综合征组和有前切除综合征组患者肛门测压结果比较的Logistic回归分析
表3 适合还纳组和不适合还纳组患者肛门测压结果比较的Logistic回归分析
[1]
Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(34): 8688-8696.
[2]
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(17): 1731-1740.
[3]
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence?[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10): 613-616.
[4]
Chau A, Maggiori L, Debove C, et al. Toward the end of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer? An 8-year experience in 189 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260: 801-805.
[5]
Ståhle E, Påhlman L, Enblad P. Double stapling technique in themanagement of rectal tumours[J]. Acta Chir Scand, 1986, 152(152): 743-747.
[6]
Scala D, Niglio A, Pace U, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection: indications and results[J]. Updates Surg, 2016, 68: 85-91.
[7]
Pan HD, Peng YF, Wang L, et al. Risk factors for nonclosure of a temporary defunctioning ileostomy following anterior resection of rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2016, 59(2): 94.
[8]
Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(5): 922-928.
[9]
冯波, 张森, 严夏霖, 等. 腹腔镜直肠前间隙的解剖分离技巧[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(7): 691-694.
[10]
申占龙, 叶颖江, 王杉. 直肠癌经肛全直肠系膜切除术的解剖学层面的辨识及其术中并发症的预防[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(7): 744-747.
[11]
Chapman SJ, Bolton WS, Corrigan N, et al. Across-sectional review of reporting variation in postoperative boweldysfunction after rectal cancer surgery[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60: 240-247.
[12]
Keane C, Wells C, O'Grady G, et al. Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19: 713-722.
[13]
Bryant CL, Lunniss PJ, Knowles CH, et al. Anteriorresection syndrome[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(9): e403-e408.
[14]
Scheer AS, Boushey RP, Liang S, et al. The long-term gastrointestinal functional outcomes followingcurative anterior resection in adults with rectal cancer: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54: 1589-1597.
[15]
马骏, 冯勇, 丛进春, 等. 低位直肠癌保肛术后的吻合口水平对排便功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2019, 17(2): 221-224.
[16]
Zhan TC, Zhang DK, Gu J, et al. Surgical complications after different therapeutic approaches for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2019, 11(5): 393-403.
[17]
Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S. Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2010, 8(8): 650-656.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[9] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[10] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[11] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[12] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[13] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要