切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 659 -662. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.06.015

经验交流

术前纳米碳定位和术中肠镜定位在腹腔镜直肠腺瘤切除中的应用
徐俊华1, 侯毅1, 朱勇1,(), 檀家俊1, 陆铤1, 陈正鑫1   
  1. 1. 210022 南京中医药大学附属南京中医院肛肠中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-24 出版日期:2021-12-25
  • 通信作者: 朱勇
  • 基金资助:
    国家区域中医诊疗中心(肛肠)、南京中医肛肠疾病临床医学研究中心资助项目(GCPY201908)

Application of preoperative nano carbon localization and intraoperative colonoscopy localization in laparoscopic resection of rectal adenoma

Junhua Xu1, Yi Hou1, Yong Zhu1,(), Jiajun Tan1, Ting Lu1, Zhengxin Chen1   

  1. 1. National Center of Colorectal Surgery, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210022, China
  • Received:2021-04-24 Published:2021-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Yong Zhu
引用本文:

徐俊华, 侯毅, 朱勇, 檀家俊, 陆铤, 陈正鑫. 术前纳米碳定位和术中肠镜定位在腹腔镜直肠腺瘤切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 659-662.

Junhua Xu, Yi Hou, Yong Zhu, Jiajun Tan, Ting Lu, Zhengxin Chen. Application of preoperative nano carbon localization and intraoperative colonoscopy localization in laparoscopic resection of rectal adenoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(06): 659-662.

目的

比较术前纳米碳定位和术中肠镜定位在腹腔镜直肠腺瘤切除术中的作用及经验。

方法

回顾性分析南京中医药大学附属南京中医院2016年1月至2020年6月行腹腔镜直肠腺瘤切除56例患者临床资料,分为纳米碳组和术中肠镜组,两组均行腹腔镜手术。纳米碳组:在手术日前1日,行结肠镜检查,在肿瘤肛侧距肿瘤边缘约1 cm黏膜下注射纳米碳,分别在3、6、9、12点分四处注射,每点注射0.25 mL。术中根据纳米碳标记,确定下切缘。术中肠镜组:切除肠管前,经肛门行肠镜检查,进镜至腺瘤或病灶下缘,根据肠镜光源,腹腔镜下在腺瘤部位予钛夹标记,并确定拟切除肠管范围。两组术后随访4~24个月。

结果

两组肿瘤均准确定位,切除肠管均带瘤,无漏诊或误诊,切缘阴性。根据TNM分期法,纳米碳组30例,术后病理17例为Ⅰ期(Tis-1N0M0)肿瘤,13例为Ⅱ期(T2N0M0)肿瘤。下切缘距肿瘤(2.1±0.5)cm。清扫淋巴结(23.42±4.80)枚。术中肠镜组26例,术后病理12例为Ⅰ期(Tis-1N0M0)肿瘤,14例为Ⅱ期(T2N0M0)肿瘤。下切缘距肿瘤(2.5±0.4)cm。清扫淋巴结(16.33±5.87)枚。两组清扫淋巴结数差异有统计学意义(t=1.41,P=0.003)。

结论

在腹腔镜直肠腺瘤切除行术前纳米碳定位和术中肠镜定位,准确性高。纳米碳定位可以增加清扫淋巴结数,更具优势,值得临床推广。

Objective

To compare the effect and experience of preoperative nano carbon localization and intraoperative colonoscopy localization in laparoscopic resection of rectal adenoma.

Methods

The clinical data of 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of rectal adenoma in Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into nano carbon group and intraoperative colonoscopy group. In the nano carbon group, colonoscopy was performed one day before the operation. Nano carbon was injected into the mucosa about 1 cm away from the edge of the tumor on the anal side of the tumor, and 0.25 mL was injected into each point at three, six, nine and twelve points respectively. During the operation, the lower margin was determined according to nano carbon labeling. Intraoperative colonoscopy group: Before bowel resection, enteroscopy was performed through anus, and the endoscope was moved to the lower edge of adenoma or lesion. According to the light source of colonoscopy, laparoscopic titanium clip was used to mark the adenoma site, and the scope of bowel to be removed was determined. The two groups were followed up for 4~24 months.

Results

All the tumors were resected with negative margin by accurate locating. there is no missed or mistaken cutting. In both groups, the resected bowel includes tumors. According to TNM staging method, In the nano carbon group, seventeen cases were stage Ⅰ(Tis-1N0M0), and thirteen cases were stage Ⅱ(T2N0M0). The distance between the lower margin and the tumor was (2.1±0.5) cm. The number of lymph nodes which were dissected were 23.42±4.80. In the intraoperative colonoscopy group, twelve cases were stage Ⅰ(Tis-1N0M0), and fourteen cases were stage Ⅱ(T2N0M0). The distance from the lower margin to the tumor was (2.5±0.4) cm. The number of lymph nodes which were dissected were 16.33±5.87. T-test analysis showed that the dissected lymph nodes in the nano carbon group were more than that in the intraoperative colonoscopy group (t=1.41, P=0.003).

Conclusions

In laparoscopic resection of rectal adenoma, preoperative positioning with nano carbon localization and intraoperative positioning with colonoscopy have high accuracy, and nano carbon localization has more advantages in increasing the number of lymph node dissection, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 两组肿瘤标本分布情况(cm)
表2 两组患者临床资料比较(
xˉ
±s
[1]
曹广, 梁杰雄, 郭洋. 腹腔镜联合结肠镜手术治疗结直肠小占位(≤3 cm)病变[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(5): 418-420.
[2]
于永扬, 王存, 周总光. 腹腔镜下结直肠癌手术(四)[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2008, 15(7): 533-535.
[3]
Fernandez LM, Ibrahim RNM, Mizrahi I, et al. How accurate is preoperative colonoscopic localization of colonic neoplasia?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(4): 1174-1179.
[4]
Blum-Guzman JP, Melo Jr SW. Location of colorectal cancer: colonoscopy versus surgery. Yield of colonoscopy in predicting actual location[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2017, 5(7): E642-E645.
[5]
盛祥宗, 黄睿, 王贵玉. 腹腔镜结直肠肿瘤手术术前定位方法的应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(1): 94-95.
[6]
殷凯, 瞿建国, 陈吉祥, 等. 腹腔镜与结肠镜联合治疗早期结直肠肿瘤的临床效果分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(11): 1810-1812.
[7]
赵磊, 刘春庆, 刘建, 等. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中应用效果评价[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(5): 442-446.
[8]
孙华朋, 张娜, 廖晓锋, 等. 术中肠镜在腹腔镜早期结肠癌手术中的临床价值[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2013, 19(11): 1220-1222.
[9]
施德兵, 李心翔, 蔡三军, 等. 三种定位方法在腹腔镜结直肠肿瘤手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2013, 16(7): 628-631.
[10]
Borda F, Jinenez FJ, Boeda A, et al. Endoscopic localization of colorectal cancer: study of ite accuracy and possible error factors[J]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 2012, 104(10): 512-517.
[11]
Nagata K, Endo S, Tatsukawa K, et al. Intraoperative fluoroscopy vs. intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for early colorectal cancer localization in laparoscopic surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22: 379-385.
[12]
蔡嘉伟, 李小兰, 陈曦, 等. 纳米碳淋巴结示踪剂在结直肠癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(10): 990-995.
[13]
Wang Q, Chen E, Cai Y, et al. Preoperative endoscopic localization of colorectal cancer and tracing lymph nodes by using carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopy[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2016, 14(1): 231.
[14]
Wang W, Wang R, Wang Y, et al. Preoperative colonic lesion localization with charcoal nanoparticle tattooing for laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2013, 9(12): 2123-2125.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要