切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 413 -417. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.04.014

经验交流

吻合器部分痔环切钉合联合选择性内痔缝扎术治疗环状痔的可行性和疗效
邓俊晖1,(), 肖凯华1, 陈志玉1, 黄稳达1, 杨家君1, 黄玉宝1, 黄学军1   
  1. 1. 516001 广东省惠州市中心人民医院肛肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-12 出版日期:2021-08-30
  • 通信作者: 邓俊晖
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度惠州市科技研发计划项目(2021WC0106421)

Feasibility and efficacy of stapler partial haemorrhoidectomy combined with selective suture ligation for residuary haemorrhoids in the treatment of circular hemorrhoids

Junhui Deng1,(), Kaihua Xiao1, Zhiyu Chen1, Wenda Huang1, Jiajun Yang1, Yubao Huang1, Xuejun Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou 516001, China
  • Received:2021-03-12 Published:2021-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Junhui Deng
引用本文:

邓俊晖, 肖凯华, 陈志玉, 黄稳达, 杨家君, 黄玉宝, 黄学军. 吻合器部分痔环切钉合联合选择性内痔缝扎术治疗环状痔的可行性和疗效[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 413-417.

Junhui Deng, Kaihua Xiao, Zhiyu Chen, Wenda Huang, Jiajun Yang, Yubao Huang, Xuejun Huang. Feasibility and efficacy of stapler partial haemorrhoidectomy combined with selective suture ligation for residuary haemorrhoids in the treatment of circular hemorrhoids[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(04): 413-417.

目的

探讨吻合器部分痔环切钉合联合选择性内痔缝扎术治疗环状痔的可行性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年3月至2017年8月于惠州市中心人民医院肛肠外科行吻合器部分痔环切钉合联合选择性内痔缝扎术的42例环状痔患者的病例资料。观察及随访手术情况、恢复时间、近远期并发症、疗效及肛门功能。

结果

患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间为(45.0±12.5)min,术后住院时间(3.2±1.4)d,术后恢复正常工作时间(12.5±5.8)d。术后疼痛明显需用止痛剂10例,肛门坠胀38例,尿潴留4例,肛缘水肿1例,肛周脓肿1例,暂时性感觉性排便失禁8例,无直肠穿孔、直肠阴道瘘、肛门大出血及盆腔感染病例。中位随访时间47个月,疼痛2例;肛乳头肥大4例;排便困难1例;无远期肛门排便失禁、无复发脱垂及反复严重出血病例。

结论

吻合器部分痔环切钉合联合选择性内痔缝扎术安全可行,并且疼痛轻,恢复快,中长期效果好;病理性肛垫部分环切并不会引起患者的远期肛门失禁。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of stapler partial haemorrhoidectomy combined with selective suture ligation for residuary haemorrhoids in the treatment of circular hemorrhoids.

Methods

Clinical data of 42 patients with circular hemorrhoids who underwent stapler partial haemorrhoidectomy combined with selective suture ligation for residuary haemorrhoids at Department of Anorectal Surgery in Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital from March 2016 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Observe and follow up the operation status, recovery time, short and long-term complications, curative effect and anal function.

Results

The operations were successfully performed on all the patients. The operation time was (45.0±12.5)min. The postoperative hospital stay was (3.2±1.4)d and the postoperative return to normal working time was (12.5±5.8)d. There were 10 cases of obvious postoperative pain requiring analgesics, thirty-eight cases of anal bulging, four cases of urinary retention, one case of anal marginal edema, one case of perianal abscess, eight cases of transient sensory defecation incontinence, no cases of rectal perforation, rectovaginal fistula, massive anal hemorrhage and pelvic infection. The median follow-up time was 47 months, there were two cases of pain, four cases of anal papillary hypertrophy, one case of difficulty defecation, no long-term anal incontinence, no recurrence of prolapse and repeated severe bleeding.

Conclusion

Stapler partial haemorrhoidectomy combined with selective suture ligation for residuary haemorrhoids in the treatment of circular hemorrhoids is safe and feasible. The pain is relatively light, the recovery is quick, and the medium and long-term effects are satisfactory. Circular resection of partial pathological anal cushion will not cause long-term anal incontinence.

图1 吻合器部分痔黏膜环切钉合联合选择性内痔缝扎术步骤。1A:术前痔脱出;1B:置入扩肛器并与齿状线平齐;1C:电灼定位齿状线上2 cm为荷包缝合高度;1D:沿定位点行齿状线上2.0 cm行黏膜下荷包缝合;1E:吻合线距离齿状线约0.75 cm~1.0 cm;1F:出血点及残存肿大内痔的8字缝扎;1G:痔回缩状态;1H:切除黏膜标本宽约2 cm~2.5 cm
表1 术后近期主要观察指标[例(%)]
1
Thomson WHF. The nature of hemorrhoids[J]. Br J Surd, 1975, 62: 542-552.
2
王振军, 杨新庆. 关于两种不同方法的吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术手术方式的探讨[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2006, 45(1): 67-68.
3
李绍堂, 曹波. 对PPH治疗内痔的再探讨[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2007, 10(2): 171-172.
4
Watson AJ, Hudson J, Wood J, et al. Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388: 2375-2385.
5
喻德洪, 杨新庆, 黄莚庭. 重新认识痔提高痔的诊治水平[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2000, 38(12): 890-891.
6
王健, 李丁. 痔的病理生理学研究进展[J].中国病理生理杂志, 2010, 26(1): 193-196.
7
Whitehead W. The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids[J]. Br Med J, 1882, 1: 148-150.
8
尹路, 张浩波. 痔上黏膜环切钉合时代如何评价Whitehead环形痔切除术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2010, 13(12): 885-886.
9
Gerjy R, Derwinger K, Lindhoff-Larson A, et al. Long-term results of stapled haemorrhoidopexy in a prospective single centre study of 153 patients with 1-6 years'follow-up. Colorectal Dis[J], 2012, 14(4): 490-496.
10
任东林, 罗湛滨, 张思奋, 等. 吻合器痔上粘膜环切钉合、肛垫复位固定术与外切内扎术治疗Ⅲ°-Ⅳ°痔的比较研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2002, 17(12): 714-715.
11
杨新庆, 韩进. 吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术学术研讨会纪要[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2002, 40(10): 795-796.
12
陈艳妮, 柳东, 夏柏, 等. 痔上黏膜环切术对痔血流影响的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(1): 56-58.
13
中国中西医结合学会大肠肛门病专业委员会. 中国痔病诊疗指南(2020)[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2020, 26(5): 519-532.
14
姚礼庆, 钟芸诗, 孙益红, 等. 吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术治疗重度痔疮的3年疗效评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2004, 7(2): 120-123.
15
岳朝驰, 杨向东. 两种不同的荷包缝合高度的PPH术治疗混合痔的临床疗效观察[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2011, 17(4): 260-262.
16
Bonello JC. Who's afraid of the dentate line? The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy[J]. Am J Surg, 1988, 156(3): 182-186.
[1] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[4] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[5] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[13] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[14] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要