切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 357 -361. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.04.004

论著

完全腹腔镜与传统开放回肠袢式造口还纳术的疗效对比研究
罗寿1, 苏昊1, 徐正1, 梁建伟1, 刘骞1, 周志祥1, 王锡山1, 周海涛1,()   
  1. 1. 北京 100021,国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-06 出版日期:2021-08-30
  • 通信作者: 周海涛
  • 基金资助:
    中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程(协同创新团队项目)(2017-I2M-4-002); 北京协和医学院2018年度研究生创新基金项目(2018-1002-02-26); 2018年度北京市东城区优秀人才计划

Retrospective analysis of short-term curative effect of total laparoscopic and open loop ileostomy reversal

Shou Luo1, Hao Su1, Zheng Xu1, Jianwei Liang1, Qian Liu1, Zhixiang Zhou1, Xishan Wang1, Haitao Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2020-12-06 Published:2021-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Haitao Zhou
引用本文:

罗寿, 苏昊, 徐正, 梁建伟, 刘骞, 周志祥, 王锡山, 周海涛. 完全腹腔镜与传统开放回肠袢式造口还纳术的疗效对比研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 357-361.

Shou Luo, Hao Su, Zheng Xu, Jianwei Liang, Qian Liu, Zhixiang Zhou, Xishan Wang, Haitao Zhou. Retrospective analysis of short-term curative effect of total laparoscopic and open loop ileostomy reversal[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(04): 357-361.

目的

对比完全腹腔镜与传统开放回肠袢式造口还纳术的近期疗效,探讨完全腹腔镜技术应用于回肠袢式造口还纳术的安全性及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年8月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科行回肠袢式造口还纳术的60例患者的临床资料,其中完全腹腔镜手术组27例,传统开放手术组33例,比较分析两组的手术安全性及近期疗效。

结果

入组患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹或围手术期死亡病例。两组患者在年龄、性别、体质指数、术前合并症及是否行辅助放化疗等基线临床资料方面比较差异无统计学意义。完全腹腔镜手术组切口长度明显短于传统开放手术组[(5.7±1.4)cm vs.(7.8±1.1)cm],差异有统计学意义(t=-6.622,P<0.001)。完全腹腔镜手术组在术后首次下地活动时间[1(1~1)d vs. 1(1~2)d]、术后首次排气时间[2(1~3)d vs. 2(2~3)d]、术后住院时间[6(5~7)d vs. 7(6~9)d]、术后并发症发生率[3.7%(1/27) vs. 24.2%(8/33)]等方面均优于传统开放手术组(P<0.05)。完全腹腔镜手术组手术时间长于传统开放手术组[(98.0±24.5)min vs.(89.4±17.5)min],但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

完全腹腔镜回肠袢式造口还纳术胃肠功能恢复快,术后住院时间缩短,手术并发症发生率降低,是安全可行的微创手术方式。

Objective

To compare the short-term outcome of total laparoscopic and open loop ileostomy reversal.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for 60 consecutive patients who underwent loop ileostomy reversal between January 2018 to August 2020, at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Twenty-seven patients were treated with total laparoscopic loop ileostomy while 33 patients were open cases. The baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications of these patients were identified and retrospectively analyzed.

Results

All patients had been successfully accomplished loop ileostomy reversal without discontinued operation. No perioperative related death cases were found in the whole group. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. The length of incision in the total laparoscopic surgery group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional open surgery group [(5.7±1.4) cm vs. (7.8±1.1) cm, t=-6.622], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There were significant differences between the two groups in the first ground activities [1 (1~1) d vs. 1(1~2) d], first flatus passage [2(1~3) d vs. 2(2~3) d], postoperative hospitalization days [6(5~7) d vs. 7(6~9) d], the postoperative complications [3.7% (1/27) vs. 24.2% (8/33)]. The total operative time of laparoscopic surgery group was longer than that of the traditional open surgery group [(98.0±24.5) min vs. (89.4±17.5) min], but the difference was not statistically significant. (P>0.05)

Conclusion

This retrospective study demonstrated that total laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal might be a safe and feasible procedure, with a lower postoperative complications and a shorter postoperative hospitalization time.

表1 两组患者临床资料分析[例(%)]
表2 完全腹腔镜手术组与传统开放手术组安全性及近期疗效比较
1
Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G, et al. The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection[J]. World J Surg, 2015, 39(4): 1052-1058.
2
Zimmermann MS, Wellner U, Laubert T, et al. Influence of anastomotic leak after elective colorectal cancer resection on survival and local recurrence: a propensity score analysis[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2019, 62(3): 286-293.
3
Shimizu H, Yamaguchi S, Ishii T, et al. Who needs diverting ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? Analysis of 417 patients in a single institute[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(2): 839-846.
4
Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A. Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2015, 400(2): 145-152.
5
Åkesson O, Syk I, Lindmark G, et al. Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012, 27(12): 1619-1623.
6
Arolfo S, Borgiotto C, Bosio G, et al. Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple practice to reduce stoma-related complications[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2018, 22(9): 683-687.
7
Waterland P, Goonetilleke K, Naumann DN, et al. Defunctioning ileostomy reversal rates and reasons for delayed reversal: does delay impact on complications of ileostomy reversal? A study of 170 defunctioning ileostomies[J]. J Clin Med Res, 2015, 7(9): 685-689.
8
Hiranyakas A, Rather A, Da Silva G, et al. Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference? [J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 90-94.
9
Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, et al. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009, 24(6): 711-723.
10
Man VC, Choi HK, Law WL, et al. Morbidities after closure of ileostomy: analysis of risk factors [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016, 31(1): 51-57.
11
潘宏达, 王林, 彭亦凡, 等. 直肠癌低位前切除保护性回肠造口还纳术后并发症分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(7): 656-660.
12
Russek K, George JM, Zafar N, et al. Laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal: reducing morbidity while improving functional outcomes [J]. Jsls, 2011, 15(4): 475-479.
13
Royds J, O'riordan JM, Mansour E, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the benefit of laparoscopy with closure of loop ileostomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(10): 1295-1301.
14
Copaescu C, Smeu B, Catanescu E, et al. Early laparoscopic ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery - technique and outcomes[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2019, 114(3): 392-400.
15
Sebastian A, Stupart D, Watters DA. Loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic versus open rectal resection [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89(3): E52-E55.
16
Kita Y, Mori S, Tanabe K, et al. Clinical prospects for laparoscopic stoma closure of a temporary loop ileostomy: Initial experience and report [J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2020, 13(4): 618-621.
17
Young MT, Hwang GS, Menon G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open loop ileostomy reversal: is there an advantage to a minimally invasive approach? [J]. World J Surg, 2015, 39(11): 2805-2811.
18
Subhas G, Kim E, Gupta A, et al. Laparoscopic loop ileostomy with a single-port stab incision technique [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2011, 15(3): 337-339.
19
Liang MK, Li LT, Avellaneda A, et al. Outcomes and predictors of incisional surgical site infection in stoma reversal [J]. JAMA Surg, 2013, 148(2): 183-189.
20
Camacho-mauries D, Rodriguez-díaz JL, Salgado-nesme N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure vs conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(2): 205-211.
21
Mari GM, Crippa J, Costanzi ATM, et al. Intracorporeal anastomosis reduces surgical stress response in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective randomized trial [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2018, 28(2): 77-81.
22
Sujatha-bhaskar S, Whealon M, Inaba CS, et al. Laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal with intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with shorter length of stay without increased direct cost [J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(2): 644-650.
23
Crawshaw BP, Chien HL, Augestad KM, et al. Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy [J]. JAMA Surg, 2015, 150(5): 410-415.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[13] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[14] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[15] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
阅读次数
全文


摘要