切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 70 -75. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.01.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留左结肠动脉在腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中的临床应用和疗效观察
姜慧员1, 刘海义1,(), 江波1, 白文启1, 王文渊1, 冯毅1   
  1. 1. 030012 太原,山西省肿瘤医院结直肠肛门外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-27 出版日期:2021-02-25
  • 通信作者: 刘海义
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重点研发计划“精准医学”专项-结直肠癌专病队列研究项目(2017YFC0908200)

Clinical application and curative effect of left colonic artery preservation in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer

Huiyuan Jiang1, Haiyi Liu1,(), Bo Jiang1, Wenqi Bai1, Wenyuan Wang1, Yi Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China
  • Received:2020-07-27 Published:2021-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Haiyi Liu
引用本文:

姜慧员, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 王文渊, 冯毅. 保留左结肠动脉在腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中的临床应用和疗效观察[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 70-75.

Huiyuan Jiang, Haiyi Liu, Bo Jiang, Wenqi Bai, Wenyuan Wang, Yi Feng. Clinical application and curative effect of left colonic artery preservation in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(01): 70-75.

目的

探讨腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉(LCA)与否对临床疗效的影响。

方法

回顾分析2015年7月至2018年7月山西省肿瘤医院结直肠肛门外科收治的行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术病例的临床资料,共186例,其中保留LCA组80例(观察组),不保留LCA组106例(对照组)。比较两组患者手术相关指标,包括手术时间、术中出血量、近端肠管缺血改变、淋巴结总清扫数量、第253组淋巴结清扫数量、预防性造口率、脾曲游离率、第253组淋巴结阳性转移率、排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率(吻合口漏、吻合口出血、腹腔感染等)及术后随访结果。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结总清扫数量、第253组淋巴结清扫数量、预防性造口率、第253组淋巴结阳性转移率、住院时间、吻合口出血、腹腔感染、吻合口狭窄、尿潴留差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。近端肠管缺血改变情况(P=0.038)及脾曲游离率(P=0.038),对照组显著低于观察组;术后肛门首次排气时间,对照组低于观察组(t=6.935,P<0.05);术后吻合口漏发生率,对照组低于观察组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.908,P=0.048)。术后所有患者均随访6~48个月,对照组局部复发率、远处转移率分别为2.5%(2/80)、11.3%(9/80),观察组分别为2.8%(3/106)、12.3%(13/106),差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组累积生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留LCA在D3淋巴结清扫根治及远期疗效方面,可以达到与不保留LCA相同临床效果,且能明显保障吻合口血供,减少吻合口漏,促进术后肠道功能早期恢复,此术式是安全,可行的。

Objective

To investigate the effect of preserving the left colonic artery (LCA) on the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 186 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer in Shanxi Cancer Hospital from July 2015 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 80 cases in the LCA preserving group (treatment group) and 106 cases in the non LCA preserving group (control group). The operation related indexes were compared between the two groups, including operation time, blood loss, changes of proximal intestinal ischemia, total number of lymph node dissection, and total number of the 253 group lymph node dissection, the rate of prophylactic stoma, separated spleen flexure, the positive rate of the 253 group lymph node metastasis, hospitalization duration, postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, abdominal infection, etc.) and postoperative follow-up results.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, blood loss, total number of lymph node dissection, and total number of the 253 group lymph node dissection, the positive rate of the 253 group lymph node metastasis, exhaust time, hospitalization duration , anastomotic bleeding, abdominal infection, the stenosis of anastomosis and the retention of urine (P>0.05). The incidence of anastomotic leakage, The rate of prophylactic stoma (P=0.038), separated spleen flexure (P=0.038) were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group, the exhaust time were also lower in the treatment group (t=6.935, P<0.05), the incidence of anastomotic leakage were also lower in the treatment group (χ2=3.908, P=0.048). All patients were followed up for 6~48 months. The local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate in the treatment group were 2.5% and 11.3%, while those in the control group were 2.8% and 12.3%, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in cumulative survival rates between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Preservation of LCA in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer in D3 lymph node dissection and long-term curative effect, can achieve the same clinical effect as non preservation of LCA, and can significantly protect the anastomotic blood supply, reduce anastomotic leakage, and promote the early recovery of intestinal function after operation. This operation is safe and feasible.

表1 两组一般资料比较[
xˉ
±s,例(%)]
表2 两组手术相关数据比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 两组并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表4 两组术后随访结果比较[例(%)]
图1 两组累积生存函数比较
4
Zhu QL, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma:complications and management in 132 con-secutive patients[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(36): 4605-4610.
5
杨堂河. 直肠全系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌术后常见吻合口并发症剖析及防治[J]. 临床医学工程, 2010, 17(3): 88-89.
6
李心翔, 李清国. 腹腔镜直肠癌术中左结肠动脉保留的意义[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(3): 272-275.
7
Enker WE.Total mesorectal excision -the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer [J]. Ann Med, 1997, 29(2): 127-133.
8
杜燕夫, 谢德红, 李敏哲, 等.腹腔镜下直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2005, 8(2): 141-143.
9
Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colonand Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2018, 23(1): 1-34.
10
Ubukata M, Itabashi M, Kameoka S. Japanese D3 lymph node dissection in low rectal cancer with inferior mesenteric lymph node metastses[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(10): 2724-2729.
11
Rao X, Zhang J, Liu T, et al. Prognostic value of inferior mesenteric artery lymph node metastasis in cancer of the descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum[J]. Clolrectal Dis, 2018, 20(6): O135-O142.
12
Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Kimura K, et al. D3 lymph node dissection in righit hemicolectomy with a no-touch isolation technique in patients with colon cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(7): 815-824.
13
Leggeri A, Roseano M, Balani A, et al. Lumboaortic and iliac lymphadenectomy: what is the role today?[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1994, 37(2 Suppl): S54-61.
14
Malassagne B, Valleur P, Serra J, et al. Relationship of apical lymph node involvement to survival in resected colon carcinoma[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36(7): 645-653.
15
Kawamura YJ, Sakuragi M, Togashi K, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastasis in T1 sigmoid colon carcinoma: should we li-gate the inferior mesenteric artery?[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2005, 40(7): 858-861.
16
Kobayashi M, Okamoto K, Namikawa T, et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery for cancer in the lower sigmoid colon and rectum: is D3 lymph node dissection with preservation of the left colic artery feasible?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(4): 563-569.
17
Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(3): 861-866.
18
Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V, et al. Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences,benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection[J]. World J Gas-troenterol, 2014, 20(13): 3680-3692.
19
Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal re-section: prospective study on 616 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(1): 108-113.
20
Sakr A, Emile SH, Abdallah E, et al. Predictive factors for small intestina and colonic anastomotic leak;a multivariate analysis[J]. Indian J Surg, 2017, 79(6): 555-562.
1
郑民华.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的现状与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011, 31(9): 841-843.
2
郑民华, 马君俊. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌切除保肛术的实践与技术[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2012, 6(1): 7-12.
3
李世拥. 不断提高低位直肠癌保肛术治疗水平[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2012, 6(1): 1-6.
21
Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U, et al. Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage and poseoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Int J Colonrecal Dis, 2007, 22(8): 919-927.
22
Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG. Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1996, 183(4): 357-360.
23
Seike K, Koda K, Saito N, et al. Laser doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2007, 22(6): 689-697.
24
王庆广, 张彩坤, 张豪英, 等. 肠系膜下动脉结扎水平对直肠癌术后排粪功能的影响[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(11): 1132 -1135.
25
伍颖君, 李民. 保留左结肠动脉应用于腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(11): 1313-1315.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[13] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要