切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 70 -75. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.01.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留左结肠动脉在腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中的临床应用和疗效观察
姜慧员1, 刘海义1,(), 江波1, 白文启1, 王文渊1, 冯毅1   
  1. 1. 030012 太原,山西省肿瘤医院结直肠肛门外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-27 出版日期:2021-02-25
  • 通信作者: 刘海义
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重点研发计划“精准医学”专项-结直肠癌专病队列研究项目(2017YFC0908200)

Clinical application and curative effect of left colonic artery preservation in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer

Huiyuan Jiang1, Haiyi Liu1,(), Bo Jiang1, Wenqi Bai1, Wenyuan Wang1, Yi Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China
  • Received:2020-07-27 Published:2021-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Haiyi Liu
引用本文:

姜慧员, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 王文渊, 冯毅. 保留左结肠动脉在腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中的临床应用和疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 70-75.

Huiyuan Jiang, Haiyi Liu, Bo Jiang, Wenqi Bai, Wenyuan Wang, Yi Feng. Clinical application and curative effect of left colonic artery preservation in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(01): 70-75.

目的

探讨腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉(LCA)与否对临床疗效的影响。

方法

回顾分析2015年7月至2018年7月山西省肿瘤医院结直肠肛门外科收治的行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术病例的临床资料,共186例,其中保留LCA组80例(观察组),不保留LCA组106例(对照组)。比较两组患者手术相关指标,包括手术时间、术中出血量、近端肠管缺血改变、淋巴结总清扫数量、第253组淋巴结清扫数量、预防性造口率、脾曲游离率、第253组淋巴结阳性转移率、排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率(吻合口漏、吻合口出血、腹腔感染等)及术后随访结果。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结总清扫数量、第253组淋巴结清扫数量、预防性造口率、第253组淋巴结阳性转移率、住院时间、吻合口出血、腹腔感染、吻合口狭窄、尿潴留差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。近端肠管缺血改变情况(P=0.038)及脾曲游离率(P=0.038),对照组显著低于观察组;术后肛门首次排气时间,对照组低于观察组(t=6.935,P<0.05);术后吻合口漏发生率,对照组低于观察组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.908,P=0.048)。术后所有患者均随访6~48个月,对照组局部复发率、远处转移率分别为2.5%(2/80)、11.3%(9/80),观察组分别为2.8%(3/106)、12.3%(13/106),差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组累积生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留LCA在D3淋巴结清扫根治及远期疗效方面,可以达到与不保留LCA相同临床效果,且能明显保障吻合口血供,减少吻合口漏,促进术后肠道功能早期恢复,此术式是安全,可行的。

Objective

To investigate the effect of preserving the left colonic artery (LCA) on the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 186 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer in Shanxi Cancer Hospital from July 2015 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 80 cases in the LCA preserving group (treatment group) and 106 cases in the non LCA preserving group (control group). The operation related indexes were compared between the two groups, including operation time, blood loss, changes of proximal intestinal ischemia, total number of lymph node dissection, and total number of the 253 group lymph node dissection, the rate of prophylactic stoma, separated spleen flexure, the positive rate of the 253 group lymph node metastasis, hospitalization duration, postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, abdominal infection, etc.) and postoperative follow-up results.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, blood loss, total number of lymph node dissection, and total number of the 253 group lymph node dissection, the positive rate of the 253 group lymph node metastasis, exhaust time, hospitalization duration , anastomotic bleeding, abdominal infection, the stenosis of anastomosis and the retention of urine (P>0.05). The incidence of anastomotic leakage, The rate of prophylactic stoma (P=0.038), separated spleen flexure (P=0.038) were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group, the exhaust time were also lower in the treatment group (t=6.935, P<0.05), the incidence of anastomotic leakage were also lower in the treatment group (χ2=3.908, P=0.048). All patients were followed up for 6~48 months. The local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate in the treatment group were 2.5% and 11.3%, while those in the control group were 2.8% and 12.3%, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in cumulative survival rates between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Preservation of LCA in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer in D3 lymph node dissection and long-term curative effect, can achieve the same clinical effect as non preservation of LCA, and can significantly protect the anastomotic blood supply, reduce anastomotic leakage, and promote the early recovery of intestinal function after operation. This operation is safe and feasible.

表1 两组一般资料比较[
xˉ
±s,例(%)]
表2 两组手术相关数据比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 两组并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表4 两组术后随访结果比较[例(%)]
图1 两组累积生存函数比较
4
Zhu QL, Feng B, Lu AG, et al. Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma:complications and management in 132 con-secutive patients[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(36): 4605-4610.
5
杨堂河. 直肠全系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌术后常见吻合口并发症剖析及防治[J]. 临床医学工程, 2010, 17(3): 88-89.
6
李心翔, 李清国. 腹腔镜直肠癌术中左结肠动脉保留的意义[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(3): 272-275.
7
Enker WE.Total mesorectal excision -the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer [J]. Ann Med, 1997, 29(2): 127-133.
8
杜燕夫, 谢德红, 李敏哲, 等.腹腔镜下直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2005, 8(2): 141-143.
9
Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colonand Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2018, 23(1): 1-34.
10
Ubukata M, Itabashi M, Kameoka S. Japanese D3 lymph node dissection in low rectal cancer with inferior mesenteric lymph node metastses[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(10): 2724-2729.
11
Rao X, Zhang J, Liu T, et al. Prognostic value of inferior mesenteric artery lymph node metastasis in cancer of the descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum[J]. Clolrectal Dis, 2018, 20(6): O135-O142.
12
Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Kimura K, et al. D3 lymph node dissection in righit hemicolectomy with a no-touch isolation technique in patients with colon cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(7): 815-824.
13
Leggeri A, Roseano M, Balani A, et al. Lumboaortic and iliac lymphadenectomy: what is the role today?[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1994, 37(2 Suppl): S54-61.
14
Malassagne B, Valleur P, Serra J, et al. Relationship of apical lymph node involvement to survival in resected colon carcinoma[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36(7): 645-653.
15
Kawamura YJ, Sakuragi M, Togashi K, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastasis in T1 sigmoid colon carcinoma: should we li-gate the inferior mesenteric artery?[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2005, 40(7): 858-861.
16
Kobayashi M, Okamoto K, Namikawa T, et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery for cancer in the lower sigmoid colon and rectum: is D3 lymph node dissection with preservation of the left colic artery feasible?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(4): 563-569.
17
Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(3): 861-866.
18
Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V, et al. Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences,benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection[J]. World J Gas-troenterol, 2014, 20(13): 3680-3692.
19
Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal re-section: prospective study on 616 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(1): 108-113.
20
Sakr A, Emile SH, Abdallah E, et al. Predictive factors for small intestina and colonic anastomotic leak;a multivariate analysis[J]. Indian J Surg, 2017, 79(6): 555-562.
1
郑民华.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的现状与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011, 31(9): 841-843.
2
郑民华, 马君俊. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌切除保肛术的实践与技术[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2012, 6(1): 7-12.
3
李世拥. 不断提高低位直肠癌保肛术治疗水平[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2012, 6(1): 1-6.
21
Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U, et al. Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage and poseoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Int J Colonrecal Dis, 2007, 22(8): 919-927.
22
Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG. Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1996, 183(4): 357-360.
23
Seike K, Koda K, Saito N, et al. Laser doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2007, 22(6): 689-697.
24
王庆广, 张彩坤, 张豪英, 等. 肠系膜下动脉结扎水平对直肠癌术后排粪功能的影响[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(11): 1132 -1135.
25
伍颖君, 李民. 保留左结肠动脉应用于腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(11): 1313-1315.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要