切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 471 -474. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2020.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

直肠癌新辅助治疗后不同等待时间对术后病理和预后的影响
胥子玮1, 季东健1, 封益飞1, 王勇1, 唐俊伟1, 傅赞1, 孙跃明1,()   
  1. 1. 210002 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-27 出版日期:2020-10-25
  • 通信作者: 孙跃明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 81400835)

Effect of different waiting time on pathology and prognosis of rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy

Ziwei Xu1, Dongjian Ji1, Yifei Feng1, Yong Wang1, Junwei Tang1, Zan Fu1, Yueming Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2020-04-27 Published:2020-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Yueming Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Yueming, Email:
引用本文:

胥子玮, 季东健, 封益飞, 王勇, 唐俊伟, 傅赞, 孙跃明. 直肠癌新辅助治疗后不同等待时间对术后病理和预后的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(05): 471-474.

Ziwei Xu, Dongjian Ji, Yifei Feng, Yong Wang, Junwei Tang, Zan Fu, Yueming Sun. Effect of different waiting time on pathology and prognosis of rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(05): 471-474.

目的

探讨中低位直肠癌术前新辅助治疗后不同等待时间对术后病理及预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月~2018年12月期间于江苏省人民医院行新辅助放化疗的77例进展期中低位直肠癌患者临床资料,按照新辅助治疗后术前等待时间分为Ⅰ组43例(6~8周)和Ⅱ组34例(9~12周),比较两组术后病理及预后情况。

结果

两组患者新辅助前的一般资料如性別、年龄、cTNM分期及CEA水平等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后病理结果提示:Ⅱ组术后病理淋巴结阳性率显著低于Ⅰ组(20.6% vs. 46.5%,P=0.018)。Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组pCR率分别为18.6%和17.6%,二者差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.012,P=0.914)。Ⅰ组共有14例患者(32.6%,14/43)肿瘤消退明显,仅剩下少量镜下癌灶或无肿瘤残留,Ⅱ组共有13例患者(38.2%,13/34)肿瘤消退明显,两组比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.702,P=0.483)。两组术后并发症发生率及远期肿瘤复发及转移差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

延长新辅助放化疗至手术的时间间隔至9~12周较6~8周能进一步降低淋巴结的阳性率,但对pCR率及肿瘤消退分级评分并无影响。对术后短期并发症发生情况以及长期复发及转移等情况也未产生较大影响。延期手术对患者来说利弊共存,因此应根据患者病情制定个体化治疗策略。

Objective

To investigate the effect of different waiting time on pathology and prognosis of low rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Seventy-seven patients who received rectal cancer surgery following neoadjuvant therapy in Jiangsu Province Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the preoperative waiting time after neoadjuvant therapy, forty-three patients were divided into groupⅠ(6~8 weeks) and 34 patients in group Ⅱ(9~12 weeks). The baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference in general data such as sex ratio, age, cTNM stage and CEA level between the two groups before neoadjuvant therapy (P>0.05). Postoperative pathological results showed that the positive rate of pathological lymph nodes in group Ⅱ was significantly lower than that in groupⅠ (20.6% vs. 46.5%, P=0.018). The pCR rates of group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ were 18.6% and 17.6%, respectively (χ2=0.012, P=0.914) . In group Ⅰ, 14 patients (32.6%, 14/43) had obvious regression of tumors. In group II, 13 patients (38.2%, 13/34) had obvious regression of tumors. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Z=-0.702, P=0.483) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and long-term recurrence and metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Extending the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery to 9~12 weeks can further reduce the positive rate of lymph nodes compared with 6~8 weeks, but there is no significant difference in the pCR rate and the grade of tumor regression. There was no significant effect on the occurrence of short-term complications and long-term recurrence and metastasis. Delayed interval time has both advantages and disadvantages for patients, so individualized treatment strategies should be formulated according to condition.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较(±s,例)
表2 两组患者手术及术后病理比较(例)
[1]
van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(6): 575-582.
[2]
Du D, Su Z, Wang D, et al. Optimal interval to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2018, 17(1): 13-24.
[3]
Petrelli F, Sgroi G, Sarti E, et al. Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies [J]. Ann Surg,2016,263(3):458-464.
[4]
Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 1997, 12(1): 19-23.
[5]
Cotte E, Passot G, Decullier E, et al. Pathologic response, when increased by longer interval, is a marker but not the cause of good prognosis in rectal cancer: 17-year follow-up of the lyon r90-01 randomized trial [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2016, 94(3):544-553.
[6]
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(7): 874-901.
[7]
Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J]. Ann Oncol, 2018, 29(Suppl. 4): iv263.
[8]
Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(8): 957-966.
[9]
Beets GL, Figueiredo NF, Beets-Tan RG. Management of rectal cancer without radical resection [J]. Annu Rev Med, 2017, 68: 169-182.
[10]
Martens MH, Maas M, Heijnen LA, et al. Long-term outcome of an organ preservation program after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2016, 108(12): djw171.
[11]
Figueiredo N, Panteleimonitis S, Popeskou S, et al. Delaying surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer has no influence in surgical approach or short-term clinical outcomes[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44(4): 484-489.
[12]
Lefevre JH, Mineur L, Kotti S, et al.Effect of interval (7 or 11 weeks) between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery on complete pathologic response in rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial(GRECCAR-6) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(31): 3773-3780.
[1] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[2] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[3] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[4] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[5] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[6] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[7] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[11] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[12] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[13] 张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[14] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
[15] 王曦娅, 尹弘青, 丁伟, 徐滨, 于海源, 马东升, 邵军. 桥本背景下甲状腺乳头状癌多参数分析预测大容量淋巴结转移[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 548-554.
阅读次数
全文


摘要