切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 471 -474. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2020.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

直肠癌新辅助治疗后不同等待时间对术后病理和预后的影响
胥子玮1, 季东健1, 封益飞1, 王勇1, 唐俊伟1, 傅赞1, 孙跃明1,()   
  1. 1. 210002 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-27 出版日期:2020-10-25
  • 通信作者: 孙跃明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 81400835)

Effect of different waiting time on pathology and prognosis of rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy

Ziwei Xu1, Dongjian Ji1, Yifei Feng1, Yong Wang1, Junwei Tang1, Zan Fu1, Yueming Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2020-04-27 Published:2020-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Yueming Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Yueming, Email:
引用本文:

胥子玮, 季东健, 封益飞, 王勇, 唐俊伟, 傅赞, 孙跃明. 直肠癌新辅助治疗后不同等待时间对术后病理和预后的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(05): 471-474.

Ziwei Xu, Dongjian Ji, Yifei Feng, Yong Wang, Junwei Tang, Zan Fu, Yueming Sun. Effect of different waiting time on pathology and prognosis of rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(05): 471-474.

目的

探讨中低位直肠癌术前新辅助治疗后不同等待时间对术后病理及预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月~2018年12月期间于江苏省人民医院行新辅助放化疗的77例进展期中低位直肠癌患者临床资料,按照新辅助治疗后术前等待时间分为Ⅰ组43例(6~8周)和Ⅱ组34例(9~12周),比较两组术后病理及预后情况。

结果

两组患者新辅助前的一般资料如性別、年龄、cTNM分期及CEA水平等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后病理结果提示:Ⅱ组术后病理淋巴结阳性率显著低于Ⅰ组(20.6% vs. 46.5%,P=0.018)。Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组pCR率分别为18.6%和17.6%,二者差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.012,P=0.914)。Ⅰ组共有14例患者(32.6%,14/43)肿瘤消退明显,仅剩下少量镜下癌灶或无肿瘤残留,Ⅱ组共有13例患者(38.2%,13/34)肿瘤消退明显,两组比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.702,P=0.483)。两组术后并发症发生率及远期肿瘤复发及转移差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

延长新辅助放化疗至手术的时间间隔至9~12周较6~8周能进一步降低淋巴结的阳性率,但对pCR率及肿瘤消退分级评分并无影响。对术后短期并发症发生情况以及长期复发及转移等情况也未产生较大影响。延期手术对患者来说利弊共存,因此应根据患者病情制定个体化治疗策略。

Objective

To investigate the effect of different waiting time on pathology and prognosis of low rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Seventy-seven patients who received rectal cancer surgery following neoadjuvant therapy in Jiangsu Province Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the preoperative waiting time after neoadjuvant therapy, forty-three patients were divided into groupⅠ(6~8 weeks) and 34 patients in group Ⅱ(9~12 weeks). The baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference in general data such as sex ratio, age, cTNM stage and CEA level between the two groups before neoadjuvant therapy (P>0.05). Postoperative pathological results showed that the positive rate of pathological lymph nodes in group Ⅱ was significantly lower than that in groupⅠ (20.6% vs. 46.5%, P=0.018). The pCR rates of group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ were 18.6% and 17.6%, respectively (χ2=0.012, P=0.914) . In group Ⅰ, 14 patients (32.6%, 14/43) had obvious regression of tumors. In group II, 13 patients (38.2%, 13/34) had obvious regression of tumors. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Z=-0.702, P=0.483) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and long-term recurrence and metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Extending the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery to 9~12 weeks can further reduce the positive rate of lymph nodes compared with 6~8 weeks, but there is no significant difference in the pCR rate and the grade of tumor regression. There was no significant effect on the occurrence of short-term complications and long-term recurrence and metastasis. Delayed interval time has both advantages and disadvantages for patients, so individualized treatment strategies should be formulated according to condition.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较(±s,例)
表2 两组患者手术及术后病理比较(例)
[1]
van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(6): 575-582.
[2]
Du D, Su Z, Wang D, et al. Optimal interval to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2018, 17(1): 13-24.
[3]
Petrelli F, Sgroi G, Sarti E, et al. Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies [J]. Ann Surg,2016,263(3):458-464.
[4]
Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 1997, 12(1): 19-23.
[5]
Cotte E, Passot G, Decullier E, et al. Pathologic response, when increased by longer interval, is a marker but not the cause of good prognosis in rectal cancer: 17-year follow-up of the lyon r90-01 randomized trial [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2016, 94(3):544-553.
[6]
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(7): 874-901.
[7]
Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J]. Ann Oncol, 2018, 29(Suppl. 4): iv263.
[8]
Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(8): 957-966.
[9]
Beets GL, Figueiredo NF, Beets-Tan RG. Management of rectal cancer without radical resection [J]. Annu Rev Med, 2017, 68: 169-182.
[10]
Martens MH, Maas M, Heijnen LA, et al. Long-term outcome of an organ preservation program after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2016, 108(12): djw171.
[11]
Figueiredo N, Panteleimonitis S, Popeskou S, et al. Delaying surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer has no influence in surgical approach or short-term clinical outcomes[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44(4): 484-489.
[12]
Lefevre JH, Mineur L, Kotti S, et al.Effect of interval (7 or 11 weeks) between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery on complete pathologic response in rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial(GRECCAR-6) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(31): 3773-3780.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[3] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[8] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[9] 萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
[10] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[11] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要