切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 46 -50. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2020.01.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

限制性结肠脾曲游离技术在腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中的临床应用
李赟1, 刁德昌2,(), 李洪明2, 卢新泉2, 易小江2, 万进2, 邓晨辉2   
  1. 1. 330006 南昌大学第一附属医院胃肠外科
    2. 510120 广州中医药大学第二附属医院(广东省中医院)结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-23 出版日期:2020-02-20
  • 通信作者: 刁德昌
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2018M633694)

Clinical application of limited-splenic flexure mobilization technique in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Yun Li1, Dechang Diao2,(), Hongming Li2, Xinquan Lu2, Xiaojiang Yi2, Jin Wan2, Chenhui Deng2   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
    2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2019-06-23 Published:2020-02-20
  • Corresponding author: Dechang Diao
引用本文:

李赟, 刁德昌, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江, 万进, 邓晨辉. 限制性结肠脾曲游离技术在腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(01): 46-50.

Yun Li, Dechang Diao, Hongming Li, Xinquan Lu, Xiaojiang Yi, Jin Wan, Chenhui Deng. Clinical application of limited-splenic flexure mobilization technique in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(01): 46-50.

目的

评价限制性脾曲游离(LSFM)技术在腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中的应用效果和安全性。

方法

回顾性总结分析2018年6月至2019年3月间广东省中医院收治的75例直肠癌患者临床病理资料,按照脾曲游离方法分为LSFM组(35例)和完全性脾曲游离(CSFM)组(40例)。

结果

两组患者均能完成腹腔镜下的直肠-结肠的无张力吻合,未发生术中毗邻脏器的医源性损伤,手术标本质量分级(Nagtegaal分级)均为3级。两组患者的手术时间无显著性差异(176.8±55.7 vs 205.5±72.4 min,P>0.05),但LSFM组的脾曲游离时间明显短于CSFM组(4.5±3.1 vs 25.4±9.3 min,P<0.01)。术中出血量、预防性造口比例、淋巴结清扫数目、术后首次肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、盆腔引流管引流量、引流管留置时间和术后并发症发生率两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均无术后30 d内再住院、再手术和死亡病例。

结论

在腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中行LSFM是安全可行的,与CSFM相比可以明显缩短手术时间,降低手术难度,并能取得同样满意的游离效果。

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of limited-splenic flexure mobilization (LSFM) technique in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical pathological data of 75 patients with rectal carcinoma administered in Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine from June 2018 to March 2019 were collected and analysed retrospectively. According to the methods of splenic flexure mobilization, these patients were devided into LSFM group (35 cases) and completed-splenic flexure mobilization (CSFM) group (40 cases).

Results

The tension-free anastomosis between rectum and colon could be achieved without any iatrogenic injury of adjacent organs among the two groups. The qualities of all the surgical specimens were assessed as 3 grade in line with Nagtegaal specimens quality grading system. There was no significant difference of operative time between the two groups (176.8±55.7 vs 205.5±72.4 min, P>0.05), but special time for splenic flexure mobilization in LSFM group were shorter significantly than those in CSFM group (4.5±3.1 vs 25.4±9.3 min, P<0.01). The differences of intraoperative blood loss, prevalence of preventive stoma, number of harvested lymphnodes, first time of postoperative flatus, length of postoperative hospital stays, drainage of pelvic drainage tube, indwelling time of drainage tube and incidence rate of postoperative complication were not of significance between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no rehospitalization, reoperation and death within 30 days postoperatively in the two groups.

Conclusions

LSFM method applied in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer is safe and feasible. It the can achieve a satisfactory mobilization effect as CSFM technique, accompanied by much shorter operative time and lower difficulty.

图1 向上切开降结肠外侧腹膜后见膈结肠韧带阻挡在前方
图2 继续向上完全离断膈结肠韧带
图3 限制性结肠脾曲游离后即可充分显露脾脏,脾结肠韧带得以保留
[1]
Gezen C, Altuntas YE, Kement M, et al. Complete versus partial mobilization of splenic flexure during laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal tumors: A comparative study [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2012, 22(4): 392-396.
[2]
Katory M, Tang CL, Koh WL et al. A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2008, 10(2): 165-169.
[3]
Carlson RM, Roberts PL, Hall JF et al. What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection? [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(3): 257-264.
[4]
Dixon AR, Maxwell WA, Holmes JT. Carcinoma of the rectum: a 10-year experience [J]. Br J Surg, 1991, 78(3):308-317.
[5]
Kennedy R, Jenkins I, Finan PJ. Controversial topics in surgery: Splenic flexure mobilisation for anterior resection performed for sigmoid and rectal cancer [J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2008, 90(8): 638-642.
[6]
Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: Facts, obscurity, and fiction [J]. Surg Today, 2009, 39(3): 183-188.
[7]
Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim HS, et al. How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection?[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2014, 11(9): 857-862.
[8]
Frame RJ, Wahed S, Mohiuddin MK, et al. Right lateral position for laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2011,13(7): e178-180.
[9]
Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Wang JK, et al. Anatomic mechanisms for splenic injury during colorectal surgery [J]. Clin Anat, 2012, 25(2): 212-217.
[10]
Vecchio R, Marchese S, Intagliata E. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: what is the role of complete mesocolic excision and splenic flexure mobilization? [J]. Indian J Surg, 2017, 79(4): 338-343.
[11]
Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, et al. Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J]. Arch Surg, 2008, 143(8): 762-767; discussion 768.
[12]
Ferrara F, Di Gioia G, Gentile D, et al. Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it? [J]. Updates Surg, 2019, 7(13): 505-513.
[13]
刁德昌,卢新泉,何耀彬,等. 横向入路法腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术的临床应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015,18(10): 1056-1059.
[14]
Meyers MA. Roentgen significance of the phrenicocolic ligament[J]. Radiology, 1970, 95(3): 539-545.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要