切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 155 -159. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.02.010

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人和腹腔镜治疗中低位直肠癌对照研究
刘新1, 李鹏1, 刘元圣1, 李冰1, 刘洪一1, 贾宝庆1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院普通外二科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-09 出版日期:2019-04-25
  • 通信作者: 贾宝庆
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.81772929)

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer

Xin Liu1, Peng Li1, Yuansheng Liu1, Bing Li1, Hongyi Liu1, Baoqing Jia1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Department of General Surgery, the General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-03-09 Published:2019-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Baoqing Jia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jia Baoqing, Email:
引用本文:

刘新, 李鹏, 刘元圣, 李冰, 刘洪一, 贾宝庆. 机器人和腹腔镜治疗中低位直肠癌对照研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(02): 155-159.

Xin Liu, Peng Li, Yuansheng Liu, Bing Li, Hongyi Liu, Baoqing Jia. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(02): 155-159.

目的

对比机器人和腹腔镜治疗中低位直肠癌的近期疗效。

方法

自2017年3月18日至2017年10月25日,共有56例中低位直肠癌患者在解放军总医院普通外二科接受直肠癌根治术,患者被随机分组接受机器人或腹腔镜手术,对两组的临床资料进行了比较。

结果

最终机器人组27例,腹腔镜组29例。机器人组较腹腔镜组在手术时间、术后镇痛时间、排气时间、恢复饮食时间、导尿管留置时间、住院日和淋巴结清扫数目方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。机器人组术中失血量比腹腔镜少[(77.0±50.0)mL vs.(121.0±129.8)mL],但差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.825,P=0.068)。机器人组术后有1例吻合口漏和1例肠梗阻,腹腔镜组术后有1例吻合口出血和1例肺部感染,术后并发症发生率方面差异无统计学意义(7.4% vs. 6.9%,χ2=0.006,P=1.000)。

结论

机器人和腹腔镜直肠癌根治术围术期效果相当,远期功能学和肿瘤学效果有待进一步随访。

Objective

To compare the surgical outcome of robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in patients with mid and low rectal cancer.

Methods

From March 18, 2012 to October 25, 2017, a total of fifty-six patients with mid and low rectal cancer underwent total mesorectal excision in our department. Patients were randomized to robotic or laparoscopic group. The perioperative outcomes of robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) were compared.

Results

Twenty-seven patients underwent RTME and twenty-nine underwent LTME. There were no differences in operation time, postoperative analgesic time, time to first flatus, time of first diet, time to remove the urinary catheter, length of stay and number of retrieval lymph node (P>0.05). The estimated blood loss seemed less in the RTME group, however it was not statistically different [(77.0±50.0) mL vs. (121.0±129.8) mL, Z=-1.825, P=0.068]. One anastomotic leakage and one ileus occurred in the RTME group while one anastomotic bleeding and one pneumonia happened in the LTME group. There was no difference in postoperative complication rate [7.4%(2/27) vs. 6.9% (2/29), χ2=0.006, P=1.000].

Conclusion

The perioperative outcome was similar between RTME and LTME. The long-term functional and oncologic outcome needs further follow-up.

表1 机器人组和腹腔镜组患者基线资料比较
表2 机器人组与腹腔镜组患者术后短期结果比较
[1]
Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2006, 20(10):1521-1525.
[2]
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:rectal canccer [OL]. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2017, Version 3(REC-B): 1.
[3]
Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25(9):2972-2979.
[4]
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(12):1689-1694; discussion 1695-1686.
[5]
杜晓辉. 应用达芬奇机器人手术系统治疗低位直肠癌[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2010, 2(9):116-118.
[6]
Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery [J]. Am J Surgery, 2004, 188(4A Suppl):19s-26s.
[7]
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al. Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Use of the cumulative sum method [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29(7):1679-1685.
[8]
Foo CC, Law WL. The learning curve of robotic-assisted low rectal resection of a novice rectal surgeon [J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(2):456-462.
[9]
Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, et al. Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes [J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(6):1040-1045.
[10]
D′Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, et al. Total mesorectal excision: A comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer [J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2013, 27(6):1887-1895.
[11]
Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: A case-matched comparison [J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(7):1834-1842.
[12]
Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A comparative study with laparoscopic surgery [J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(1):129-137.
[13]
Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al. Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: Long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(3):266-273.
[14]
王勉,李前进,郑建勇,等. 达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜手术在直肠癌根治术中的病例对比研究[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 4(1):40-44.
[15]
张海容,袁维堂,周全博,等. 机器人与腹腔镜在中下段直肠癌根治术中的应用效果比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(5):540-544.
[16]
李鹏,李冰,刘洪一, 等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统在胃癌中的应用[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2015, (6):1103-1106.
[17]
杜晓辉,邹振玉,李荣. 机器人与3d腹腔镜辅助直肠癌根治术近期疗效对比研究[J]. 腹部外科, 2016, 29(3):205-208.
[18]
雷伟琦,张东,刘莱蓬, 等. 机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌全系膜切除术近期疗效对比的meta分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(17):2903-2907.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要