切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 145 -149. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.02.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜在老年人结直肠加速康复外科中的价值
迟洪辉1, 邱志刚1, 位俊慧2, 卢云1, 孙振青1,()   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛,青岛大学附属医学院胃肠外科
    2. 251700 滨州,滨州市中心医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-20 出版日期:2019-04-25
  • 通信作者: 孙振青
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市自主创新重大专项胃肠外科子项目(No.14-6-1-zdzx-7)

The value of laparoscopy in the elderly colorectal fast track surgery

Honghui Chi1, Zhigang Qiu1, Junhui Wei2, Yun Lu1, Zhenqing Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Binzhou City Center Hospital, Binzhou 251700, China
  • Received:2018-05-20 Published:2019-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhenqing Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Zhenqing, Email:
引用本文:

迟洪辉, 邱志刚, 位俊慧, 卢云, 孙振青. 腹腔镜在老年人结直肠加速康复外科中的价值[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(02): 145-149.

Honghui Chi, Zhigang Qiu, Junhui Wei, Yun Lu, Zhenqing Sun. The value of laparoscopy in the elderly colorectal fast track surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(02): 145-149.

目的

研究腹腔镜在老年人结直肠加速康复外科中的应用,评判其价值。

方法

将50例结直肠癌的老年患者随机分为两组,Ⅰ组为加速康复外科(ERAS)开腹组(n=25),Ⅱ组为ERAS腹腔镜组(n=25);分别记录两组患者围手术期的相关指标。

结果

在肠道通气时间及耐受半流质饮食时间上,Ⅱ组比Ⅰ组恢复的快。术后第3天和第7天Ⅰ组患者的CRP与IL-6水平比Ⅱ组升高更明显(t=4.133,3.915,2.138,5.298;均P<0.05)。术后第3天,Ⅰ组患者的免疫球蛋白IgM含量下降比Ⅱ组更明显(t=2.163,P<0.05);术后第7天,Ⅰ组的IgM、IgA低于术前水平(t=2.876,2.855;均P<0.01),Ⅱ组与手术前相比差异无统计学意义。T细胞亚群均较术前降低,Ⅰ组CD4下降比Ⅱ组更明显(t=4.075,P<0.05)。4种内脏蛋白水平较术前均明显减低,Ⅰ组的TRF水平低于Ⅱ组(t=5.547,2.357;均P<0.05);术后第7天,Ⅰ组的四种内脏蛋白相比于术后第3天有所升高,Ⅱ组PRE、TRF的含量与术前相比差异无统计学意义(t=1.625,0.816;均P>0.05)。

结论

老年结直肠癌患者在ERAS理念下行腹腔镜手术,加速了老年患者的术后康复进程,减少了手术创伤对机体免疫功能的损害,减少了营养损耗,是可行的方式。

Objective

To study the application of laparoscopy in the elderly colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery, and to evaluate its value.

Methods

Fifty elderly patients with colorectal cancer were randomly divided into two groups: enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and open surgery (groupⅠ: n=25), enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and laparoscopic surgery (group Ⅱ: n=25). Their perioperative related indicators were recorded and analyzed.

Results

In the time to anal exhaust and the tolerant time for semi-fluid diet intake, group Ⅱ recovered faster than group I. On the third and the seventh day after operation, the levels of CRP and IL-6 in group I was more significant than those in group Ⅱ (t=4.133, 3.915, 2.138, 5.298; all P<0.05). On the third day after operation, the levels of immunoglobulin IgM content in group I was more obvious than that in groupⅡ (t=2.163, P<0.05). The T cell subsets were lower than those before operation, the decrease of CD4+ in groupⅠwas more obvious than that in group Ⅱ (t=4.075, P<0.05). The levels of four kinds of visceral proteins were significantly lower than those before operation, and the level of TRF in group I was lower than that in groupⅠ (t=5.547, 2.357; all P<0.05); on the seventh day after operation, the four visceral proteins in group I increased compared with the third day after operation, and the contents of PRE and TRF in groupⅡwere not significantly different from those before operation (t=1.625, 0.816; all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer under the concept of ERAS accelerated the recovery process of elderly patients, reduced the damage of surgical trauma to the body′s immune function, and reduced the nutritional loss.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 各种临床效果比较
表3 检测指标
检测指标 Ⅰ组 Ⅱ组 t P
CRP(mg/L) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 1.3±0.7 1.1±0.7 1.010 0.317
? 术后3天 71.4±28.7# 42.2±20.6# 4.133 <0.001
? 术后7天 18.3±7.2# 11.3±5.3# 3.915 <0.001
IL-6(ng/L) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 8.1±2.6 8.2±2.7 0.133 0.894
? 术后3天 18.7±6.4# 15.2±5.1# 2.138 0.038
? 术后7天 13.1±2.1# 9.8±2.3# 5.298 <0.001
IgA(U/mL) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 156.9±46.6 158.4±48.6 0.111 0.912
? 术后3天 143.3±43.1# 144.1±42.2# 0.066 0.948
? 术后7天 152.7±34.9# 155.9±49.5 0.264 0.793
IgG(U/mL) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 136.9±36.5 137.6±37.5 0.067 0.947
? 术后3天 123.4±40.1# 122.3±41.8# 0.095 0.925
? 术后7天 136.2±36.6 137.1±33.8 0.090 0.928
IgM(U/mL) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 172.7±50.2 173.5±49.6 0.057 0.955
? 术后3天 139.1±37.2# 165.1±47.2# 2.163 0.036
? 术后7天 165.1±46.4# 172.4±45.5 0.562 0.577
CD4+(%) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 30.9±3.16 30.15±3.21 0.832 0.410
? 术后3天 22.14±3.41# 26.53±4.17# 4.075 0.001
? 术后7天 31.1±3.13 30.11±3.23 1.101 0.276
CD8+(%) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 27.52±3.61 27.36±2.12 0.191 0.849
? 术后3天 25.19±3.13# 25.98±3.19# 0.884 0.381
? 术后7天 27.19±3.41 27.41±3.32 0.231 0.818
CD3+(%) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 55.94±8.14 56.11±7.13 0.079 0.937
? 术后3天 51.21±7.01# 51.41±6.96# 0.101 0.920
? 术后7天 55.89±7.23 55.96±7.31 0.034 0.973
ALB (g/L) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 35.8±2.8 35.9±3.1 0.120 0.905
? 术后3天 29.9±2.9# 31.1±3.5# 1.320 0.193
? 术后7天 31.8±2.6# 33.5±3.1# 2.101 0.041
PRE(mg/L) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 218±28 225±26 0.916 0.364
? 术后3天 168±29# 170±25# 0.261 0.795
? 术后7天 201±24# 227±26 3.674 0.001
TRF(g/L) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 2.0±0.5 1.9±0.4 0.781 0.439
? 术后3天 1.1±0.2# 1.5±0.3# 5.547 <0.001
? 术后7天 1.7±0.3# 1.9±0.3 2.357 0.023
RBP(mg/L) ? ? ? ?
? 术前 29.9±8.2 30.2±7.9 0.132 0.896
? 术后3天 23.3±3.1# 23.1±3.9# 0.201 0.842
? 术后7天 26.1±2.9# 27.7±2.6# 2.054 0.045
[1]
王锡山.中美结直肠癌流行病学特征及防诊治策略的对比分析[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 6(6):447-453.
[2]
Kehelt H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome [J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(6):633-641.
[3]
中国加速康复外科专家组. 中国加速康复外科围手术期管理专家共识(2016) [J].中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(6):413-418.
[4]
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2010, 363(9416):1187-1192.
[5]
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 6(7):477-484.
[6]
Zhao JH, Sun JX, Huang XZ, et al. Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery with in fast track surgery [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016, 31(3):1-10.
[7]
Ng WQ, Neill J. Evidence for early oral feeding of patients after elective open colorectal surgery: a literature review [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2011, 15(6):696-709.
[8]
Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Stadt J, et al. Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(10):1368-1375.
[9]
Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2009, 96(9):982-989.
[10]
The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon canner [J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(20):2050-2059.
[11]
Jakobsen DH, Sorme E, Andreasen J, et al. Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast track VS conventional care [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2006, 8(8):683-687.
[12]
Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, el al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study) [J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(6):868-875.
[13]
MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnachie A, el al. Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2007, 9(4):368-372.
[14]
Tsikitis VL, Holubar SD, Bozois EJ, et al. Advantages of fast-rack recovery after laparoscopic fight hemicolectomy for colon cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(8):1911-1916.
[15]
Feng J, Li K, Li L, et al. The effects of fast-track surgery on inflammation and immunity in patients undergoing colorectal surgery [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016, 31(10):1675-1682.
[16]
Kim JS, Hur H, Min BS, et al. Inflammatory and Tumor Stimulating Responses after Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy [J]. Yonsei Med J, 2011, 52(4):635-664.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要