切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06) : 484 -488. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.06.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

病理高危因素对I期直肠癌患者预后的影响
陈庆民1, 吕晓红1, 李智刚1, 王喜1, 王锡山2, 张恒春1,(), 范东1,()   
  1. 1. 157000,牡丹江医学院附属红旗医院普外一科
    2. 100021 北京,国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-19 出版日期:2016-12-25
  • 通信作者: 张恒春, 范东

Pathological risk factors affect the prognosis of patients with stage I rectal cancer

Qinmin Chen1, Xiaohong Lyu1, Zhigang Li1, Xi Wang1, Xishan Wang2, Hengchun Zhang1,(), Dong Fan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157000, China
    2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2016-08-19 Published:2016-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Hengchun Zhang, Dong Fan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hengchun, Email:
    Fan Dong, Email:
引用本文:

陈庆民, 吕晓红, 李智刚, 王喜, 王锡山, 张恒春, 范东. 病理高危因素对I期直肠癌患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(06): 484-488.

Qinmin Chen, Xiaohong Lyu, Zhigang Li, Xi Wang, Xishan Wang, Hengchun Zhang, Dong Fan. Pathological risk factors affect the prognosis of patients with stage I rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(06): 484-488.

目的

探讨病理高危因素与I期直肠癌预后的关系,从而为临床提供有益的指导。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年1月期间在哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院结直肠肿瘤外科接受根治性手术治疗且术后病理回报为I期的直肠癌患者178例,分为有高危因素组和无高危因素组,有高危因素的患者119例,男性60例,女性59例;无高危因素的患者59例,男性33例,女性26例。中位随访时间为33个月,并详细记录患者的无病生存期。

结果

2组患者在性别、年龄、大体类型、分化类型、淋巴结检出数目、浸润深度、肿瘤部位等方面比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.480,t=2.023,χ2=2.244,χ2=5.614,t=2.387,χ2=1.590,χ2=3.099,P均>0.05),2组术后随访时间相同,无高危因素组患者预后良好无复发及远处转移,而有高危因素组中出现了局部复发和远处转移的病例。有和无高危因素的I期直肠癌患者的无病生存期差异存在统计学意义(HR=0.86,95%CI 0.56~0.97)。淋巴管浸润、脉管瘤栓、神经侵犯及低分化是影响患者无病生存期的主要因素。

结论

对于含有病理高危因素的I期直肠癌患者应进行密切随访观察。

Objective

To investigate the effect of pathology risk factors on prognosis of stage I rectal cancer patients.

Methods

Data of patients with stage I rectal cance from January 2011 to January 2013 in the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were retrospectively collected. 178 cases were included and were divided into two groups according to the presence of high risk pathological factors. 119 cases were defined as high-risk group including 60 males and 59 females, and 59 cases were in non high-risk group, the male cases were 33 and females were 26 respectively. Median follow-up time was 33 months.

Results

There were no difference in the sex, age, macroscopic type, differentiation, numbers of lymph node, depth of invasion and location (χ2=0.480, t=2.023, χ2=2.244, χ2=5.614, t=2.387, χ2=1.590, χ2=3.099, all P values >0.05) . No recurrence and metastasis were observed in non-high-risk group while local recurrence and metastasis were observed in high-risk group. There was difference in survival time between two groups (HR=0.86, 95%CI 0.56~0.97). Lymph vascular infiltration, nervous invasion and low differentiation were the main factors that affected survival.

Conclusion

Closely follow up should be performed on the high-risk stage I rectal cancer patients.

表1 I期直肠癌患者临床资料
表2 I期患者复发和转移情况(例)
图1 I期直肠癌患者无病生存期
图2 I期伴淋巴管侵犯阳性和阴性组的无病生存期
图3 I期有血管瘤栓阳性和阴性组的无病生存期
图4 I期伴神经侵犯阳性和阴性组的无病生存期
图5 I期低分化组与阴性组的无病生存期
[1]
Siegel,Rebecca L,Miller, et al. Cancer statistics, 2016[J]. CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2016, 66(1): 10-29.
[2]
Endreseth BH,Myrvold HE,Romundstad P, et al. Transanal Excision vs. Major Surgery for T1 Rectal Cancer[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005, 48(7): 1380-1388.
[3]
Zhang H,Zhang YS,Jin XW. Transanal single-port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.[J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2013, 17(1): 117-123.
[4]
Sternberg A,Mizrahi A,Amar M. Detection of venous invasion in surgical specimens of colorectal carcinoma: The efficacy of various types of tissue blocks[J]. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2006, 59(2): 207-210.
[5]
Abdulkader M,Abdulla K,Rakha E. Routine elastic staining assists detection of vascular invasion in colorectal cancer[J]. Histopathology, 2006, 49(5): 487-492.
[6]
邵小林,韩洪秋,何小玲.淋巴结检出数和淋巴结转移度对Ⅱ~Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2011, 14(4): 249-253.
[7]
Carolyn Compton,Fenoglio-Preiser CM, et al. Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference[J]. Cancer, 2000, 88(7): 1739-1757.
[8]
Okamoto Y1,Mitomi H,Ichikawa K. Effect of skip lymphovascular invasion on hepatic metastasis in colorectal carcinomas[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2015 , 20(4): 761-6.
[9]
Saha AK,Smith K JE,Sue Ling H. Prognostic factors for survival after curative resection of Dukes′ B colonic cancer.[J]. Colorectal Disease the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland, 2011, 13(12): 1390-1394.
[10]
Schwenter F,Morel P,Gervaz P. Management of obstructive and perforated colorectal cancer[J]. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2010, 10(10): 1613-1619.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[12] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[13] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[14] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要